Case Study of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti

781 Words2 Pages

Case Study of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti

Italian anarchists Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were arrested

near Boston in 1920 and charged with the murder of a shoe factory

paymaster and the guard of the factory. Frederick Parmenter and the

guard were carrying $16,000 in payroll money for the South Braintree

shoe factory on April 15, 1920. They were attacked, robbed, and shot.

The two killers escaped in a getaway car. A similar crime was

committed in the nearby town of Bridgewater four months earlier.

Bridgewater police chief arrested Sacco and Vanzetti, who were two

poor Italian immigrants, and anarchists. Vanzetti was indicted for the

Bridgewater robbery attempt. Frederick Katzmann, the district attorney

who had interrogated the two men, prosecuted him. Vanzetti wouldn't

testify at his trial. The prosecution's case was based on eyewitness

testimony. The descriptions of the witnesses were a rough match of

Vanzetti. Despite an alibi backed up by several witnesses that he was

selling eels during the Christmas Eve robbery attempt, the jury found

Vanzetti guilty of attempted robbery and attempted murder on July 1,

1920. Judge Webster Thayer gave him 12 to 15 years in prison.

Both men were then indicted for the South Braintree murders. Judge

Thayer requested and received the case. Famous labor lawyer Fred Moore

came to Dedham to defend Sacco & Vanzetti. Moore removed every

businessman and Italian from the jury. The prosecution relied heavily

upon the political beliefs of the two men. In closings, the

prosecution emphasized that the men were armed during their arrest and

lied during questioning, but never accounted for the ...

... middle of paper ...

...mpt to overcome his shyness around girls. This had the

opposite effect. Loeb, like Leopold, was a precocious but emotionally

unstable youth. The victim, Bobby Franks, was more or less chosen at

random. Their idea was to kidnap the child of a wealthy family and

demand a ransom. The money was to be thrown off a moving train at a

designated point. The boys reluctantly concluded that the only way to

avoid detection was to kill their victim, so he could provide no clues

to the authorities.

Darrow's closing statement spanned three days. Darrow's speech made a

tremendous public impression. Judge Caverly took two weeks to prepare

his decision. He was finally ready on September 10, 1924. In front of

a packed courtroom he announced that he had decided against execution

and sentenced the defendants instead to life imprisonment.

Open Document