Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Unethical versus illegal behavior
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Unethical versus illegal behavior
Dishonest and pressure selling can be considered as problematic issues to consumers, which could cost up to £3.3 billion according to the research of Consumer Focus in UK in 2009 . The misleading and aggressive selling not only undermine the fairness of competition between businesses but primarily also damage consumer’s interests and confidence, importantly, restrain the development of EU internal market. However, the level in consumer protection among EU is fragmented as the great divergence between Member States’ legal systems. Thus, Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD) adopted in 2005 with the full harmonisation provides a uniform set of rules for Member States to tackle unfair commercial practices in order to enhance consumers’ …show more content…
Specifically, part 1 will introduce the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive as the source of the Regulations, including its purpose, scope, structure, its influence on private law in general and its impact on the pre-existing legislation in the UK. Part 2 will be separated into two part, concerning (1) the 2008 Regulations in details including general prohibitions, misleading practices, aggressive practices, outright prohibitions, offences, penalties, defences and illustrate the necessary of the new private rights to redress and (2) the 2014 Regulations including the conditions to apply the new rights, two tiers of remedies and the problems in the
This is a complex case, involving multiple parties and several variables that need to be examined thoroughly. The parties mentioned include Knarles operator of the facility maintenance company, his son Barkley, their employee, a licensed plumber, and Mr. Chetum. Although in the end Chetum is suing the facilities maintenance firm for a breach of contract, all factors must be examined to determine proper fault.
On Thursday, 11/12/2015, at 17:01 hours, I, Deputy Stacy Stark #1815 was dispatched to a domestic disturbance in progress located at 66 Paper Lane, Murphysboro, IL 62966. It was reported that a 15 year old female juvenile was busting out windows on her mother’s vehicle. Deputy Sergeant Ken Lindsey #2406 and Deputy John Huffman #2903 responded as well.
Apart from Antitrust laws, there are several other laws that promote fair business practices. The Robinson-Patman Act prohibits price discrimination. This act ...
Even though consumers have great protection rights in Australian Customer Law, they have to understand that this law is designed to provide consumers and sellers a fair go. Therefore, consumers also have to be aware that they will not be protected if they are careless and make unreasonable demands.
CQC (2009) Guidance about compliance. Summary of regulations, outcomes and judgement. Available at: http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/media/documents/guidance_about_compliance_summary.pdf Accessed on: 21/03/2014
On Thursday, August 21, 2014 it was announced that the Department of Justice has reached a $16.65 billion settlement with Bank of America Corporation. This was the largest civil settlement with a single entity in American history (Sienkiewicz, 2012). The settlement with Bank of America Corporation was from when the company knowingly marketed and sold toxic loans (“Bank of America to pay $16.65 Billion in historic justice department settlement for financial fraud leading up to and during the financial crisis | OPA | department of justice,” 2014). However, at the time it was not only Bank of America that was being unethical. Two other major financial companies; Country Wide Financial and Merrill Lynch were also
Negligence, as defined in Pearson’s Business Law in Canada, is an unintentional careless act or omission that causes injury to another. Negligence consists of four parts, of which the plaintiff has to prove to be able to have a successful lawsuit and potentially obtain compensation. First there is a duty of care: Who is one responsible for? Secondly there is breach of standard of care: What did the defendant do that was careless? Thirdly there is causation: Did the alleged careless act actually cause the harm? Fourthly there is damage: Did the plaintiff suffer a compensable type of harm as a result of the alleged negligent act? Therefore, the cause of action for Helen Happy’s lawsuit will be negligence, and she will be suing the warden of the Peace River Correctional Centre, attributable to vicarious liability. As well as, there will be a partial defense (shared blame) between the warden and the two employees, Ike Inkster and Melvin Melrose; whom where driving the standard Correction’s van.
When people think of predatory pricing, two main laws come to the minds of most...
...ur; in such cases, competition authorities must act to fight unlawful practices that are detrimental for the economic welfare.
The purpose of this research is to identify and discuss the basis for the concerns and intervention of the regulator, in this case – European Union Antitrust Commission. Furthermore, the nature and effectiveness of the fines imposed will be evaluated.
The issue in this case is whether there is a legally binding contract between Roland and Bernie. The things that needs to be considered is whether there is an agreement between Roland and Bernie. If there is an offer and acceptance, then there is an existence of agreement. According to Section 2(a) of the Contract Act 1950, offer can be defines as when one person implies his/her willingness to another in order to acquire their consent. (Abdullah et al, 2011) The person who make the offer is known as ‘offeror’ or ‘promisor’. (Lee and Detta, 2009) An offer can be made in the method of orally, by conduct, writing or by the mixture of these forms. An offer must require an effective communication with offeree. The formation of contract when offeree accepted the proposal. (Dass, 2005)
(iii) Suppose that Sarah buys the building. Now how much will the business have toearn in order to break even in economic terms?
Review the scenario below. Consider the legal principles influencing the likelihood of any successful action against Steve in negligence.
The defendant is an Airlines Company that had 900 employees. The economic crisis followed with monetary crisis gave bad effects to the defendant. They should decrease the number of their airplanes form 9 to 2 airplanes. They also had to do the efficiency on their employees to 700. On the efficiency process, there was an agreement between the defendant and employees representation on October 30 1998. The agreement stated that they would bring Independent Public Accountant to analyze company financial condition. During the process, all side should work on their duty. The Defendant should pay employees’ wage. The agreement was not guarantee that didn’t mean the dispute process was over, but the negotiation still moved on. During the process, there was another agreement between the defendant and several employees. They agreed the finish the disputed process and the employees would get separation pay. Meanwhile, other employees, who were 153 people didn’t agree with that agreement. Because they didn’t agree each other, so the employees gave the case to the “Panitia Penyelesaian Perselisihan Perburuhan Pusat (P4P)”.
would like to put you in a situation and show you how a consumer can