Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The life of Julius Caesar
The tragedy of julius caesar speeches
The life of Julius Caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The life of Julius Caesar
Brutus used logos and rhetorical questions as a rhetorical technique in his speech at Caesar’s funeral to persuade and inform the audience about why his death was necessary. However, Antony used more pathos and repetition in his speech. This allowed him to connect with the audience on an emotional level, which was more persuading than Brutus’s method. Brutus’s speech was more formal and directed to the citizens of Rome. At first, it was so moving and inspiring that the audience wanted to make him the king. However, Brutus only used his reasoning and logic without any kind of emotional appeal to it. In his speech, he stated that the reasons behind Caesar’s death was because he loved Rome more than Caesar, Caesar was too ambitious, so he
Brutus used pathos excessively in his funeral speech and they appealed to the Plebeians’ sense of patriotism and love. Before Brutus joined Cassius’ conspiracy, he was one of Caesar’s favorites, a close friend, and well-respected and trusted by Caesar. When Cassius brought out the idea of the conspiracy, Brutus anxiously pondered and conflicted with himself about it, but in the end joined with the genuine belief that it will benefit the people of Rome. He hoped Caesar’s death would end corruption in Rome, and the distress and sadness of the citizens. Thus, he used pathos in his funeral speech in order to appeal to the sense of patriotism and love for home. Brutus said, “If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer:
Brutus vs Antony The most predominate and important aspect in the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare are the speeches given to the Roman citizens by Brutus and Antony, the two main characters, following the death of Caesar. Brutus and Antony both spoke to the crowd, using the same rhetorical devices to express their thoughts. Both speakers used the three classical appeals employed in the speeches: ethos, which is an appeal to credibility; pathos, which is an appeal to the emotion of the audience; and logos, which is an appeal to the content and arrangement of the argument itself. Even though both speeches have the same structure, Antony’s speech is significantly more effective than Brutus’s. Both speakers used an ethical appeal to the crowd and established their credibility.
In Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, Marc Antony, Caesar’s closest friend, is gravely underestimated. Other characters, such as Brutus, failed to understand him and didn’t seem to take him seriously. They also assumed that he would take part in the conspiracy against Caesar. They truly belittled him. Loyal and admirable, Marc Antony demonstrated a strong sense of justice to take revenge against the conspirators of Caesar’s assassination.
The speeches given by both Brutus and Mark Antony in William Shakespeare’s, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar are very persuasive to the audience. Mark Antony delivers a strong funeral oration in Caesar's honor. Antony was a trusted friend of Caesar and he manipulated the conspirators in thinking that he was fine with their deed. Antony uses a kind of mode of persuasion in order to convince the audience that Caesar is worthy kind of man. Antony then must use pathos in order to call the emotion of the audience. He must have to understand the nature of the audience to successfully induce his audience that Caesar really was not an ambitious man. After Brutus's speech ended it was Antony’s turn but Brutus made a big mistake by leaving as Antony started his speech. Antony starts his speech by saying, "friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears! I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him" (3. 2. 70). He immediately starts using rhetoric and calculated dramatic words to incite the crowd into a frenzy.
After Caesar dies in Act II, the excitement doesn’t end it gets even more intense when the speeches of Brutus and Antony take place. Antony and Brutus both gave speeches at Caesar’s funeral that were laid out with many uses of fallacies, logos, ethos, and pathos were used throughout these speeches. In one way, they had many similarities in their techniques. However, Antony and Brutus had many differences as well which put one of the speeches slightly above the other. Reading the play, in Antony's speech, he did well using logos, ethos, and pathos, along with fallacies.
In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, the characters give many persuasive speeches, some stronger than others, to convince characters in the story about what is true, false, right, and wrong. After given instructions on a way to present his funeral speech for Caesar, Antony uses knowledge and skill to cover for his persuasion. Antony speaks to the Roman mob after Brutus. His objective is to turn the people against Brutus and the conspirators in a persuading way so the group will no longer follow what is wrong. Antony has skillful ways to help him convince the Romans that Caesar was a loving man and Brutus is not so honorable. He uses verbal irony, parallel phrases with repetition, and questioning of the truth to sway the crowds' feelings.
...ns. This made Antony's speech more effective in the fact that he used detailed reasoning for why Caesar was not ambitious. This was why the people came to his favor in the end. The tones and rhetorical devices they used helped to capture their audience by appealing to their emotions and helping to move the views of Antony and Brutus's views across to their listeners. Comparing effectiveness and ineffectiveness of both speeches was important in determining which way the people would be swayed.
Brutus used his speech to persuade the people in two different ways. The first way is when uses logos as a way to persuade by logic. Caesar was sent to be killed and Brutus could have kept him alive, but that would have resulted in everyone being slaves. If Caesar was killed, then nobody would be slaves. Brutus figured that since he was ambitious that he would become a bad king and he didn't want to take the chance of that happening. The other way he used his speech to
After Caesar was killed, Antony and Brutus both gave rhetoric speeches at Caesar’s funeral. Both Antony and Brutus used many different methods of speaking to make their speech persuasive. Antony’s speech definitely won the people over and had the most effect on them. Overall I think that Antony’s speech was better and more persuasive than Brutus’s speech.
Julius Caesar is a Shakespeare play that is famous for its use of rhetorical devices which are used to persuade. In the play, Julius Caesar has just been assassinated and the crowd is confused and very scared. His so-called "friends" have just betrayed him including his long-term friend Brutus who took place in the assassination. Mark Antony was another friend of Caesar 's that didn 't take place in the assassination and was also shocked, scared, and confused on why people would do such a thing. After Caesar 's death, he was able to convince Brutus that they should have a proper funeral and that he should be allowed to speak on his behalf. Brutus agreed on two conditions, the fact that he would be able to speak first and also that Mark Antony
Antony utilizes his skill in pathos during his funeral speech. Knowing that the crowd was very emotional following Brutus's speech, he riles them up once more. For example, Antony asks, "You all did love him once, not without cause:/What cause withholds you then to mourn for him?” This rhetorical question makes the mob remember when it loved and celebrated Caesar. Furthermore, Antony creates
Brutus’s main subject or purpose of his speech was to explain to the audience, the people, what had happened to Caesar and why. He understands that this issue is very near to the heart’s of the people, so he must tread lightly and be careful with what he says. Because of this, he starts off his speech with a plea for credibility. He calls
There are many similarities and differences in Brutus and Mark Antony’s funeral speeches and outcomes. One of the main differences between the speeches, is how they choose to relate to the people. Brutus chooses to use logic and reasoning, because he knows the people of Rome are very smart people. This is shown when he says, “Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor that you may believe. Censure me in your wisdom, and awake your senses that you may the better judge” (Shakespeare Lines 14-17). Antony, on the other hand, chooses to emphasize his bond with Caesar and appeal to the emotions of the people of Rome. This is shown by when he says “you did all love him once, not without cause… Bear with me; my heart is in the coffin
In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, eight people conspire against Julius Caesar. Caesar is slowly rising in power, and the envious Cassius recruits several people to help murder Caesar. One man he recruited, Marcus Brutus, plays a very big role in the conspiracy and the play. Unlike the other conspirators, Brutus murders Caesar because he believes it would be for the good of Rome. After Caesar's death, Brutus delivers a speech to calm the citizens of Rome. After he's finished, Antony delivers a speech, which has a the complete opposite affect. The speeches in Julius Caesar have powerful affects on the people of Rome.
Brutus and Mark Antony had presented very different eulogies to the Romans after the death of Caesar. Both funeral orations came from different person’s belief, revealing much about their personalities and characters. Brutus’s delivery of oration was presented formally and very unambiguous to the Romans. Throughout the speech he tries and justifies the murder of Caesar. Caesar is portrayed as an ambition man, who was very narcissistic. When it came to mark Antony, he was personal and mordant. Antony tried and shielded Caesar’s reputation, but at the same time charged at Brutus to make him sound guilty. Though both are convincing speakers, Antony persuades the mob to sympathize with him, appealing to the audience’s emotion as well as their rationality.