Booker T Washington Dbq

830 Words2 Pages

During the late 1800s and early 1900s, Booker T. Washington became a spokesman for blacks in America. The debate over whether his philosophy and actions betrayed the interests of African Americans rose after he founded a school for them which lacked in strong academic teachings. Whether Washington wanted the best for African Americans or wished to please white society was not always clear. His actions proved more so that he helped African Americans so that they would please white society during that time period. This was the argument of Donald Spivey while Robert J. Norrell chose to defend Washington in his document. Spivey made a stronger argument supported with evidence to prove that Washington’s philosophy and actions betrayed the interests …show more content…

In fact, the institute mainly provided the students with educations on how they should act and how to make them “indispensable ‘objects’ to the prosperity of the nation” (Spivey 148). This meant failing to provide real education that would be useful to the students at the institute. Spivey also noted that most teachers at Tuskegee Institute were Hampton graduates meaning that they were more experienced in discipline rather than teaching the students the tasks that they would find useful. Spivey was led to believe that Washington was training the African Americans to please white society as the founder of the Tuskegee Institute because the academic classes were not taken very seriously and were optional. Spivey supported these ideas by using quotes from the institute. Whether it be notes sent to the founder of the “misbehaving children” or regulations crafted to discipline the students. These additions to the document help formulate Spivey’s argument and make it more concrete, showing how if the students did not act as they should they would be punished for it. This proves that Washington did not have the best interests of the African Americans in mind. He provided them with inadequate educations for tasking that they would need to master. Washington’s actions and rules at the …show more content…

His viewpoint was that Washington was always an advocate for blacks and was simply thinking of whites about “the future of race relations” in America. This was due to the fact that it was the white society segregating the blacks and using newspapers to reflect the “Negro-as-beast” thinking. Norrell supported these ideas using examples from the time period. For example, “In 1899, in response to the horrific Sam Hose lynching in Newnan, Georgia, Washington wrote to the Birmingham Age-Herald that he opposed ‘mob violence under all circumstances. Those guilty of crime should be surely, swiftly and terribly punished, but by legal methods” (Norrell 159). Using examples from the time period helps him to convey his argument that Washington had good intentions and make it

Open Document