Blue Collar Workers Essay

1669 Words4 Pages

As well as experiencing discrimination socially, American blue-collar workers experience discrimination economically. A prevailing wage is an appropriate and generally accepted amount of money that reflects the wages of a certain area (Mahalia). Prevailing wages are meant to be paid to blue-collar workers by contractors in order to “enhance the welfare” of the workers by providing to them wages that are not too low to sustain the worker and his or her family, reports the Economic Policy Institute, a group of experts in economics and sociology working to find the effects of prevailing wages (Mahalia). Many contractors nationwide refuse to provide prevailing wages to blue-collar workers because of the belief that prevailing wages elevate operational …show more content…

An extensive survey was given to blue-collar workers in 1946, then again decades later in 1986, by researchers working to discover motivational factors in the workplace (Kovach 58-61). These surveys determined that blue-collar workers across demographics of age and gender, on average, place “full appreciation of work done,” as well as “good wages,” in their upper 5 factors of motivation in the workplace (Kovach 58-61). These motivational factors on which blue-collar workers place high value are not provided to them when social discrimination, such as the current mocking of their values, and economic discrimination, such as the absence of prevailing wages, are present in society. The lack of motivation caused by this lack of key motivational factors negatively impacts the workers’ functionality, detracting from their economic output, as explained by Adam Smith and Richard Nixon when they stated that motivation is a central factor for productivity and economic success, as, if workers do not see incentives or advantages to work, the workers will abandon it (Smith 101-120; Peters and Woolley). Aside from motivational setbacks, the University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health recently performed an experiment that discovered that discrimination based on the socioeconomic statuses of the …show more content…

Alfred Lubrano wrote the book Limbo: Blue-Collar Roots, White-Collar Dreams and was raised by a blue-collar worker (Ward 38). Lubrano interviewed many “straddlers,” who are white-collar individuals, or those who work in offices or management and hold high socioeconomic statuses, who grew up in a blue-collar environment (Ward 37-40). These now white-collar individuals, such as lawyers, grew up learning the blue-collar principles of hard work that are not as emphasized in other social classes, and achieved economic success in their jobs due to their backgrounds (Ward 37-40). Lubrano concludes, as a result of conducting these interviews in order to discover how blue-collar work enhances the economic success of other professions, that blue-collar workers inspire a tradition of hard work that is unmatched by any other kind of work ethic in America, and can be utilized in non-blue-collar occupations (Ward 37-40). This robust, persistent work ethic is what lifted the United States from being “a poor nation” to being an “industrious, purposeful” one over the course of two centuries, proclaims former United States President Richard Nixon, who was raised in a blue-collar family (Peters and Woolley). The tradition of hard work that Lubrano and Nixon speak so highly of drives the American economy through inspiring productivity and economic success in many careers

Open Document