Bikini Atoll Persuasive Essay

670 Words2 Pages

What would have it been like without the nuclear test on the Bikini Atoll? Would it have been good or bad? Let’s find out! The test on Bikini Atoll contained two tests named “Able” which is the Airdrop. And “Baker” which is the underwater tests. Both were deadly, inflicting immense damage upon the environment of Bikini Atoll. So if It was without these two tests what would happen? The US could may have not found a way to defend from another country’s atomic bomb if It were to happen. But we may just elaborate another solution to defend against other countries from bombing our place. So It would be a great idea to never have bombed Bikini Atoll. Theoretically if we have not done experiments on Bikini Atoll the Bikinians would be alive. So everything was radiated on the area of Bikini Atoll. If you are trying to say that “Well, the US could have just removed ALL of the radiation from Bikini Atoll” that would have taken them a long time to remove the radiation from Bikini Atoll. So the Bikinians would have a longer time to come back to their atoll and the new generation of Bikinians would may not know what to do. On the article on the Bikini Packet "We soon discovered that the fish in the lagoon were toxic from the reef, so we got sick every time that we would eat the fish”. So if they haven’t bombed Bikini Atoll the problems on Rongerik they would have not been suffering from the fish from Rongerik lagoon. In the article on the Bikini Packet it states that “This event terrified and deeply saddened us at the same time.” This is implying that there are other problems that the Bikinians occurred that the problem was that they were terrified of the atoll thinking that there was a curse on the atoll of Rongerik. So if they have not gone on Rongerik they would have not encountered the

Open Document