Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversy surrounding religion in u.s. schools
A debate about how public prayers should not be allowed in schools against
Public prayer should be allowed in school
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Controversy surrounding religion in u.s. schools
All over America, students have been praying in schools for decades, until this year in 2014. Many school systems have taken away the right to pray in school. In some districts, students have taken a vote for their rights to pray, but that was revoked by the schools official’s. In some districts the superintendent has been forced to make some of these changes. It could cause the school district to be sued and therefore the superintendent is looking at the liability of the district. The graduating classes of 2014 will have normal graduations, except one thing, they will not be able to openly pray. Some see this as a violation of their right to pray and a right to their free speech.
Students are allowed to pray voluntary as long as it doesn’t
…show more content…
These students come from homes of different religious beliefs. Some students are taught that they should pray before making any decisions or before any event. Therefore you will see students praying before they eat, before the go to bed or even before that take a test. It is instilled within them that praying is the right thing to do. It is vital that our public schools respect the religious teaching and practices of everyone and as well as abide by the wishes of the parents as long as it is not unlawful or unconstitutional. The main question is what about students that do have religious teachings at home? Are they to ignore their teaching, go against school policies, or what actions should they take. Even though the Supreme Court has been strict to enforce laws forbidding religion in public schools, parents still believe it is their responsibility to determine what is appropriate and what is not. These justices have stated that “prayer has no place in public education.” However, no one or nobody can legislate no praying in public places because one can always pray silently and it does not interfere with the right of …show more content…
For example; Catholic, Baptist, Quaker, Atheist, Buddhist, Jewish, and Agnostic just to name a few. Public schools are supported by all taxpayers, and therefore I feel the students should be free to prayers. We have three main sector of society. They are the school, home and the church. Each plays an important part in our development. It is the duty of the parents and the churches to teach religious beliefs. There are times when these responsibilities are in opposition to each other and cause conflicts between the two sectors. What’s wrong with a voluntary prayer? The Constitution prohibits prayer in public
This paper deals with the stance of our schools and government on prayer in school. In this paper I will show how our government is hypocritical in its dealings of the prayer in school issue and how some of us as citizens are hypocritical as well. I will discuss the freedom of religion rights and how its interpretation affects prayer in school. Also, I will address the popular phrase, “separation of church and state”, that is often used to argue against prayer in school.
In 1962 the Supreme Court decided that public schools did not have the power to authorize school prayer. This decision made public school in the U.S. more atheistic than many European nations. For example, crosses still hang on the classroom walls in Poland, and the Ten Commandments are displayed in Hungary. There are prayers held at the beginning of legislative and judicial sessions and every President has mentioned a divine power in his inaugural speech. In keeping with a spirit of religious freedom as stated in the First Amendment, there is no reason why students should not be allowed to have a moment of silence during the school day when they can pray or do as they choose.
No Prayer in Public Schools Chapter three of Civil Liberties: Opposing Viewpoints inspired me to research today’s issues of school prayer. To understand how we got to where we are today, I first delved into our country's history of court cases pertaining to rulings on prayer in schools. Lastly, to update my audience on how our lives are being affected today, I directed my efforts toward finding current situations. By analyzing these situations, I gained knowledge for a better understanding of why society needs to be aware of these controversies. I don’t think there should be any form of organized prayer in today’s public schools.
In 1971 in Mobile County Alabama the School Board created a state statute that set aside time at the beginning of each day for silent ’meditation’ (statute 6-1-20), and in 1981 they added another statute 16-1-20.1 which set aside a minute for ‘silent prayer’ as well. In addition to these, in 1982 the Mobile County School Board enacted statute 16-1-20.2, which specified a prayer that teachers could lead ‘willing’ students in “From henceforth, any teacher or professor in any public educational institution within the State of Alabama, recognizing that the Lord God is one, at the beginning of any homeroom or any class, may pray, may lead willing students in prayer, or may lead the willing students in the following prayer to God… “ (Jaffree By and Through Jaffree v. James). Ishmael Jaffree was the father of three students, Jamael Aakki Jaffree, Makeba Green, and Chioke Saleem Jaffree, who attended a school in Mobile County Alabama. Jaffree complained that his children had been pressured into participating in religious activities by their teachers and their peers, and that he had requested that these activities stopped. When the school did nothing about Jaffree’s complaints he filed an official complaint with the Mobile County School Board through the United States District Courts. The original complaint never mentioned the three state statutes that involved school prayer. However, on June 4, 1982 Jaffree changed his complaint. He now wanted to challenge the constitutionality of statutes 16-1-20, 16-1-20.1 and 16-1-20.2, and motioned for a preliminary injunction. The argument against these state laws was that they were an infringement of the Establishment Clause within the First Amendment of the Constitution, which states that Congr...
The point and purpose was to promote the great nation of the United States, and
"God help, I'm so lost!" If you listen carefully, this is a common thought that is heard throughout many schools in the nation. Is this thought appropriate? The following statement clearly shows that the law allows students and adults to practice religion, but at the same time be respective of others and their beliefs even if they do believe or if they don't. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, or to petition the government for a redress of grievances." (First Amendment, The Constitution of the United States). Prayer is not normally permitted as a scheduled part of classroom activities, because it would result in the violation of the principle of church-state separation, which has been defined by court interpretations of the 1st Amendment to the U.S, Constitution. The separation principle is extended to Public school as an arm of the government, with an exception which can be permitted if, during the school year, a mixture of prayers, statements, etc are delivered, using material derived from a number of different religions and secular sources. So far, this has never been tried in a school or ruled upon by a court (Religion in Public).
INDTRODUCTION “Sex and Religion”? Those two don’t really go hand in hand,” commented a freshman student from UF. Like this student, numerous people around the world believe this misconception to be true. Whether people argue for or against the importance of gender in religion, more than just what goes on in the bedroom has been heating up lately. Many debates have sparked due to the negative connotation associated with sex when confronted about its position in religious cultures.
Prohibiting School Prayer Threatens Religious Liberty. Civil Liberties. Ed. James D. Torr. -. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2003.
They state that public schools exist to educate, not to proselytize. Children in public schools are a captive audience. Making prayer an official part of the school day is coercive and invasive. What 5,8 or 10-year-old could view prayers recited as part of class routine as "voluntary"? Religion is private, and schools are public, so the only appropriate situation is that these two do not mix.
The first and fourteenth amendments to the constitution establish the rules that apply to school prayer. The first amendment says: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The 14th Amendment of the Constitution has several clauses; the clause that pertains to school prayer is the Equal Protection Clause requiring each state to provide equal protection under the law to all people within that state. What this means is, each student in the school is protected from being forced to pray in school in any certain way.
(Americans United, 2017) The people who support this say that praying in school would break that. Actually, that isn’t even correct. The Constitution and Supreme Court ruling in 1962 have said that schools cannot preach about religion, but can teach it.
Having prayer in public schools has been a problem for a long time. After reading several articles about prayer in public schools, it seems the biggest problem with it is that no one wants any ones else’s religion to be forced on them. Two of the biggest groups with the most problems and issues are Christians and Muslims. The main reason seems to be the fact that these two religions serve two different gods and what is required practices of both religions. These two issues strike fear in parents on both sides of these religions.
Churches should not be able to get away with as much as they do.Religion can cause problems in government and other areas of life that may be contributed to them having too much freedom. It tends to get ruled in favor of discriminating against people who are not part of said religion. That is why religion needs to have a tighter reign on what it can and can't do. The other side would say that religion has too little freedom. Or that religious institutions are not being allowed to practice the beliefs of that religion because of laws put in place over them. Although, anything that has religion brought into it usually favors the religious side over the opposing side being that the religious discrimination card tends to be used.
While students are attending public schools they should be aware of their religion options. The student should have the right to practice their religion as they please, just on the own time. Yes, religion plays a huge part in molding a person but, should be practiced when the time is available, not in a classroom setting. The government should have the ability to control the protection of the students that just want to learn. The capability to regulate the religious practices while attending public educational institutions should be left to the government. Faith, religion and belief, usually are three words that are used to describe one situation, although these words have three different meanings. To have faith in something or someone you must first believe in it and also accept it as well, but have a belief without evidence. Religion is a belief in a heavenly superhuman power or principle, such as the almighty or creator to all things. Everyone has faith and belief, but not all believers believe in the almighty. Allowing religion into public schools while everyone attending not having the same belief is unfair, unconstitutional and is complicated to teach to a verity of students.
Annie Laurie Gaylor quoted Thomas Jefferson in her article The Case Against School Prayer, “No citizen shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever…” and that to “compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of [religious] opinions which he disbelieves is sinful and tyrannical” (Gaylor, 1995, p. 7). No man should have to be subject to anything that he does not believe in. Prayer should not be allowed in the public school system because of the idea of separation of church and state and the First Amendment.