Argumentative Essay: No Surviving A Nuclear War

Analyzing the Argumentative Article “Let’s Be Clear, There is No Surviving a Nuclear War”
The debate over if humans can survive a nuclear war or not is an interesting topic. The article, “Let’s Be Clear. There is No Surviving a Nuclear War,” is written by James E. Doyle and Ira Helfand. The article was posted on Newsweek.com on August 20, 2015. This article was written to challenge the argument that people can survive a nuclear war. The authors are hoping that the audience will carry out action to prevent nuclear wars all together. An unfamiliar audience, or an audience who is mildly opposed to their views, are the type of audience that Doyle and Helfand are writing this article for. The main claim of this article is that the devastating
The use of logic and motivational proofs are also successful in this argumentative article. The authors uses Dallas’s consequences of a nuclear war to strengthen their own argument. The consequences ranged from health care failing, uninhabitable land, to lack of trust in the government which would lead to further destruction (Doyle and Helfand). By using Dallas’s examples the writers are able to state that these events would be impossible to prepare for (Doyle and Helfand). These consequences are acceptable examples of logic and motivational proofs. The authors exploit the advantage of the human need to stay safe by writing the consequences that could virtually wipe us out. The writers continue to claim that during the aftermath of just a few bombs that 2 billion people would be at risk of starvation. The authors back up this claim with a report that was “released in 2013 by the Nobel Laureate International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War and its U.S. affiliate Physicians for Social Responsibility” (Doyle and Helfand). This is a successful logic and motivational proof that encourages the audience to have increased awareness of the ultimate dangers of a nuclear war and begin using steps to prevent them. Another exceptional example of the use of logic is how the authors claim that even using all of the money from the U.S. defense budget to build a Nuclear Global Health Workforce would be useless (Doyle and Helfand). The writers back up this claim by stating a source named “Medical Implications of Nuclear