Analysis Of The Samurai's Garden By Gail Tsukiyama

1356 Words3 Pages

In The Samurai’s Garden by Gail Tsukiyama, a young man is thrown from his established world, left in a new, confusing realm that holds more than meets the eye. In the midst of a violent and ferocious war between the Chinese and Japanese in mid 1937, this young man, Stephen, contracts tuberculosis, and is sent to his family’s summer house in Japan. There he meets the house’s caretaker, Matsu, a simple and reserved man who holds back all but the most necessary speech. This meeting will come to define many of Stephen’s interactions with others throughout the novel: reserved and limited. In this odd land filled with subtle secrets and unspoken uncomfortability, Stephen is prepared for a very quiet and restful period, marked with healing and growth. …show more content…

This parallel is used throughout the text in order to help the reader better understand these characters’ emotions and what draws them to do as they do. For example, Keiko tells Stephen she cannot be with him near the end of the novel, saying, “There can never be any ‘us,’” she answered. Then Keiko pulled away from me, and for a moment I thought she was going to strike me with her sandals again.” (Tsukiyama 187) This of course connects to Sachi and Matsu’s inability to live fully together, Sachi being held back by her shame and her compulsion to honor her family. Similarly, Keiko is left unable to be with Stephen as she has an obligation to her family. Understanding this connection, it allows us to draw upon Sachi’s experiences with this situation, and how she has learned to appreciate what was, such as Sachi’s lost beauty. This doesn’t just allow us to understand things about Keiko and Sachi, it also helps us to understand the reactions from other characters involved in these parallels. Stephen’s slow coming to acceptance, for example, and his help doing so from Matsu, help to show both Matsu’s and Stephen’s peace, their understanding and appreciation of inopportune situations. One might suggest that this parallel between the characters of Sachi and Keiko removes from the understanding of each …show more content…

These small contributions, though, help to add to the greater image of each character as deep and unique people. Examples of these small contributions are abound in the novel. For instance, Stephen gets a letter from his younger sister, Penelope, or Pie, talking about her daily life in war-torn China, saying, “For the past month, I have been going after school to the Red Cross refugee center in Wan Chai. I do everything, from rolling bandages to sorting donated clothes and filling care packages.” (Tsukiyama 117) This connects rather easily to the character of Matsu, who is seen as the sole saving grace of Yamaguchi, the village of lepers. Being one of the smaller connections in the novel, it is often discounted as unimportant or insignificant. I think quite the opposite, as I think this parallel says a lot about both characters, but most prominently that of Matsu. From the beginning of the novel Pie is characterized as a sweet and innocent child, even coming into Stephen’s room to talk to him while he was still dangerously tubercular. This parallel allows this benevolence to be extended onto Matsu, as in Matsu’s case his help for Yamaguchi could be otherwise discounted as showing his love for Sachi. Instead, the link helps show how Matsu’s care for these people is instead based on his

Open Document