Samurai Vs Knights Research Paper

531 Words2 Pages

Do you think the samurai and knights have more similarities than differences? Samurai and knights were two societies that lived about one thousand years ago. Samurai lived in Europe and knights lived in Japan. They both faced many problems throughout their battle. Critics would say that samurai and knights have more similarities than differences, however they actually had more differences than similarities. They had many differences throughout their lives. Some of their differences were between military training and warfare.

To start off, military training caused many differences for samurai and knights. According to Document C, in “Japan: Memoirs of a Secret Empire,” and “Warrior Challenge,” it states, “At about age 14 trainees officially became samurai...he would usually become a knight around the age of 21.” Based on this information, the young samurai became an official at age 21. Unlike the young knights that became official at age 21. The knights went through a long process of training, which helped them …show more content…

According to Document D, “Armor of Medieval Warriors,” it states, “Samurai did not wear armor on their right arm, so they could easily draw their bow.” This information explains, that there’s two kinds of warfare, projectile and shock. The samurai used projectile warfare, which is shooting or throwing arrows, javelins, and bullets. While the knights used shock warfare, striking the enemy with weapons like swords, lances, or axes. In war, samurai didn’t cover their one arm, so they could throw and shoot easily. Based on Document C, “Europe Background Info,” it states, “An oldie, but a goodie. Half spear, half axe, all dangerous.” This explains that the knights used shock warfare. While the samurai used projectile. The knights contained heavier armor than the samurai, which is heavier and more protective in battle. While the samurai had lighter armor, which wasn’t as protective in

Open Document