Analysis Of Mary Shelley And James Whale's 'Frankenstein'

901 Words2 Pages

Mary Shelley and James Whale address the advantages of communication throughout Frankenstein using differing approaches. The characterization of the creature in Shelley and Whale’s pieces demonstrates the principal effect of incompetent verbal expression through his inability to form relationships. In Whale’s 1931 film Frankenstein, he removes the humanistic qualities of the creature by enabling his speech, highlighting the complexity of the character Shelley provides. Without vocal recognition, deciphering the creature’s intentions results in a misinterpretation of violence, resulting in conclusions being made based off of his actions rather than what he attempts to communicate verbally. Providing verbal abilities in Shelley’s text shows …show more content…

Upon the interaction with the De Lacey family, he expresses this knowledge, “[imagining the young] would be disgusted, until, by [his] gentle demeanour and conciliating words [he] should first win their favour, and afterwards their love” (Shelley 131). Once realizing that the blind man’s ability to remain unperturbed by his appearance is a chance to communicate, the initial acceptance, and then dismissal due to his deformities pushes him further away from humanity. This results in the creature’s frustration, so enraged with the discharge he receives upon his encounters with humans that he becomes a murderer, swearing ceaseless revenge upon Frankenstein and the human race for his misfortunes. In conclusion, the creature in Shelley’s text has a strength with his words; however, this power does not allow him to form relationships with humans. Although the creature can speak in the novel, it does not provide advances in the outcomes of his encounters. The influence of verbal abilities for the creature is that it evokes sympathy towards the character, allowing the deduction of his gentle nature and kind demeanour without the presence of initial prejudice due to physical …show more content…

His deformed appearance in the movie has a secondary effect when compared with his articulatory disabilities, exemplified in the scene introducing light. The flickering effect and use of shadows show that the room is dark, with only the sound of footsteps in the old house. The louder step of the creature indicates a heavier weight, insinuating his strength and the ability to overpower those in the room. When Fritz enters with a torch, his first interaction with fire, the creature initially backs away, inducing a response of fear. Provoking him with the flame misconceives his actions, causing cries of fear to become sounds of anger, the attempt to swat the fire becomes an effort to attack Fritz, and pushing those trying to detain him becomes violence, which immediately arouses the response “shoot it! It’s a monster” (Whale). The turnover in the perceived image of the creature occurs due his inability to communicate effectively. Without the capability to express his fear of fire, the humans view his movements as an endeavoured attack rather than a misunderstanding. Consequently, the creature’s lack of communication leaves him vulnerable to the assumptions of the population, and although his appearance remains disturbing, it does not cause one to flee in fear until his actions become misinterpreted as

Open Document