Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Justice and morality standards in relation to power
Role of negotiating skills for personal success
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Justice and morality standards in relation to power
Summary
The chapter “Gain the High Ground” describes that there should be a relative or standing position of the person is society. A position of superiority must be ensured by an individual over his opponents. Attaining the status of being classic makes an individual superior over others and his acceptance level in the society ultimately increases with the passage of time. In order to gain the high ground, an individual must use negotiations in order to gain the intellectual and psychological superiority. The chapter further describes that high ground is being gained by an individual with the help of political and ethical parlance that basically refers to the status of remaining moral or getting respect from others. It upholds and adheres goodness and justice that is recognized as universally recognized standard. Parties or individuals who are seeking to attain high grounds always refuse to act in ways which are treated either as morally defensible or legitimate. In order to win a certain argument or produce a critique of something, an individual may use the perspective of “Gai...
Socail inequality is a problem that not only happens in one setting, but also is prevalent everywhere around the world. The Year of the Flood and The Cat’s Table are an example of two very different settings but have the same concurring issue of social class inequality with abuse of power, corruption, abuse of privilege, and the motivation to keep social status. Power is a tool that we must use delicately because it can be used in evil and unjust ways to create problems in our society.
Every person within a society is the product of his own social status and the actions his status lead him to undertake. “Hedda Gebler” by Henrick Ibsen, and “Punishment” by Rabindranath Tagore are two texts which display the profound idea that our social status is the foremost important factor which influences our decision making and also may corrupt our morals. If we analyze the two texts together we see that both Hedda in “Hedda Gabler” and the characters in “punishment” look forward to happiness but they are unable to receive it because of their particular society. On the one hand, Hedda’s arrogance, her decision to manipulate and devalue others, her unmerited action to burn Loveborg’ s manuscript, her unhappy marriage to Tesman, her suicide etc. are all fostered from her views of class superiority. She certainly thinks the way she grew up or the way she lives is superior to all others, thus she has the quality to control others. On the other hand, within ‘Punishment’, Dukhiram’s sudden action to kill his wife, Chidam’s decision to convince his wife, Chandara to take the blame for Radha’s murder, and Chandara’s acceptance of the false accusation that is befallen upon her are all resulted because of their lower social status. They are inclined to take unjust decisions/actions either because they are angry of the way they are being treated in society or because their hopes can never go along with the social standards. Overall, these texts provide the notion that our social position may hold us back from taking the right actions by which not only can we wrong others, but also dispose ourselves to face injustice.
“The more you get out of this book, the more you’ll get out of life.” This is the claim that Dale Carnegie makes in reference to his book, How to Win Friends and Influence People. Carnegie proposes that there are four main ideas that one should use when dealing with people: 1) Know how to handle people, 2) Make people like you, 3) Win people to their way of thinking, and 4) Be a leader. These skills are essential not only in being a good manager, but also in dealing with people in day to day life.
Another key theme that is linked to both the Dignity of The Human Person and The Common Good is the theme of Subsidiarity. This theme ...
Cantor, Paul A. “A Class Act: Persuasion and the Lingering Death of the Aristocracy.” Philosophy and literature 23.1 01 Apr 1999: 127. Johns Hopkins University Press. 04 Nov 2013. Web.
In the novel We Are Called to Rise by Laura McBride, Avis and Bashkim had dreadful childhoods. Bashkim migrated to the U.S. shortly after he was born with his political refugee parents. Although Avis did not migrate, she had similar experience having moved a lot with her single mother and younger brother. Avis grew up with a dysfunctional mother and no father figure. Like Avis Bashkim did not receive the paternal love; however, he had a father who was reclusive, aggressive and more concerned with money than being a father. Both characters faced a lot of difficult obstacles during their childhood. Bashkim and Avis each grew up poor, suffered abuse and had to learn to be responsible at a young age.
Traditionally justice was regarded as one of the cardinal virtues; to avoid injustices and to deal equitable with both equals and inferiors was seen as what was expected of the good man, but it was not clear how the benefits of justice were to be reaped. Socrates wants to persuade from his audience to adopt a way of estimating the benefits of this virtue. From his perspective, it is the quality of the mind, the psyche organization which enables a person to act virtuously. It is this opposition between the two types of assessment of virtue that is the major theme explored in Socrates’ examination of the various positions towards justice. Thus the role of Book I is to turn the minds from the customary evaluation of justice towards this new vision. Through the discourse between Cephalus, Polemarchus and Thrasymachus, Socaretes’ thoughts and actions towards justice are exemplified. Though their views are different and even opposed, the way all three discourse about justice and power reveal that they assume the relation between the two to be separate. They find it impossible to understand the idea that being just is an exercise of power and that true human power must include the ability to act justly. And that is exactly what Socrates seeks to refute.
I am writing this paper in order to address the topic of social rank and how power affects ideas. Money, racism, and their contribution to people’s ideology are my main arguments to this topic. As
Authority, borrowed or earned, is a currency of influence, the power to provoke cognitive shifts or physical action. Darrow, the I in Pierce Brown’s dystopian tale of stratified culture and revolt, recognizes he borrows authority from Mustang, the leader of House Minerva, but in this recognition comes his submission. To borrow authority from another person is to submit to that person’s authority; consequently, stray from borrowed authority, and authorization no longer exists. This model, called a Complex Authority Structure, begins with a primary person of authority allowing a second person to borrow that authority. In turn, the borrower then holds that authority over a third party.
Thus, the aanganwadis, computer education, healthcare and mid-day meals are the various ways in which the dominant group (Vedanta) negotiates with the subordinate group to gain their consent. In Gramsci's theory, the dominant group gains its power from its position in the economy and therefore, the concessions granted are mostly economic in character. However, hegemony is also a terrain for negotiating ideas and values, so the the subordinate groups must also recognize their own ideas in the prevailing hegemony. The Vedanta Group obviously realised that simple rehabilitation packages will not allow them to gain the consent of the villagers, and thus extended their “generosity” towards building a better life for this anonymous village. Viewers are now made to consume the image of Vedanta as a benign corporation, only trying to help. Mukesh Kumar, a top-executive from Vedanta, claims that, “Our effort is to bring the poor tribal people into the
...social norms, centuries old philosophies that have contested each other through time will be forgotten, new lies will be told by an ever evolving interior structure of social elite to promote or retain their position, It is our job as free men and women to strive to obtain truth and to insure that there is justice and liberties for all individuals.
Likewise, Plato’s philosopher king also uses the same concept but calls it “Justice” or “Good.” Similarly, to Machiavelli, who needs his Prince to have virtù to lead the people, Plato necessitates that his king use philosophical knowledge and emphasize justice to guide the unenlightened masses towards a just and stable society as well. When Socrates discusses the allegory of the cave, he remarks how when rulers must descend “to the general underground abode” where the masses “reside,” the ruler “will see a thousand times better than [the inhabitants of the cave]…because [the ruler has] seen the truth about things admirable and just and good” (Plato 520c). Plato believes that by seeing beyond the cave, and understanding the situation he exists in, the leader will have the appropriate ability to bring foresight and intelligence when making difficult decisions. While Plato’s and Machiavelli’s means of educating, changing and legitimizing political communities differ, the two philosophers share the same goal of using the benevolent dictators’ attained knowledge to lead the masses and their governments to prosperity and good fortune.
Without the attachment of discourse such as good/bad, a person may non-judgementally examine their power and gain insights into ways they perpetuate oppression (Wong, 2004). This engagement in critical reflectivity regarding one's own discourses and location of privilege is necessary for the "integration of what one learns and knows with how one acts" (p.4). Action for social justice can begin when "discursive rationality, the dominant form of knowledge" (p.3), is replaced with listening rationality.
First key assumptions, this refuses that power is a possession or that the power is centered by pointing out that power is something that cannot be possessed or shared. The Power is what is expressed or treated rather than what is owned. The power is everywhere in every area, every circle, and is an integral part of any organisation in society. The power is the process that will cause change, support, or setbacks in a power relationship through combat and face in different ways. Second key assumptions, this rejects the ideals of modernism that claim the universality of science and rationality including citing universal reality and seek the only best way to practice. Also, this indicate that the fact that the society is understood to be just a discourse or system and process of producing identity, and the meaning to all things in society including both knowledge and truth. Third key assumptions, this challenges perception and empirical way of seeking empathy by arguing that sensory perception may be less reliable than other methods of seeking knowledge, such as intuition or aesthetic experience (Hatch,
There was once a time when the societies of the world were nothing more than a ruling class and a class that was ruled. In these feudal societies classes were set. There was little chance for a member of the ruling bourgeoisie class to cross over to the oppressed proletariat class or from the proletariat class to the bourgeoisie class. Every individual within each class had the routine for each day set out for him or her. There was little change in the lives of individuals of these societies. There was monotony in their work and their work did little more for them than keeping them alive. In those societies, in those times, there was scarce chance of bettering oneself.