All Those Things Never Said And The Fault In Our Stars Analysis

859 Words2 Pages

One of the main motifs in All Those Things We Never Said and The Fault in Our Stars is death. Both Marc Levy and John Green have included cultural references from France and United States through the depiction of funerals and overall meaning of death to the protagonists in both novels. Levy attempts to portray a common American funeral, however, it is noticeable the influence of the French culture due to the omission of the eulogy and the presence of few relatives. Meanwhile, Green presents a typical American funeral and eulogies from Hazel and Isaac.
Levy, based the perspective of death on Orson Welles’ quotation “We're born alone, we live alone, we die alone. Only through our love and friendship can we create the illusion for the moment that …show more content…

The eulogy is omitted; Julia refuses to give a small speech by replying, “I wish I did” and Wallace declines by saying he is not “capable” , which could be considered unconventional as in most funerals in the United States a close relative or friend will deliver an eulogy. Ergo, it suggests to some extent French influence; French citizens are respectful towards the deceased and their family . Julia and Wallace lack of a close relationship with Anthony, thus, both characters are presented as distant and hostile. Julia’s omission could be easily interpreted as a degree of loathing and detachment from her father. Whereas, Wallace, can be discerned as a respectful employee as it would be bizarre and disrespectful towards the Walsh family.
Green’s The Fault in Our Stars is substantially influenced by the (twentieth century) existentialist philosophy of Jean-Paul Sartre and Martin Heidegger .Thus, characteristics such as facticity, transcendence, and freedom have been included in the narrative in order to portray Hazel’s evolution regarding the facticity of Cancer, her own existence and her perception of death, and, her anxiety regarding her parents well-being as she believes to be nuisance that will ultimately harm those around …show more content…

For instance, Hazel’s realization of the facticity of cancer restricted her existence and essence as she becomes an observer of her own life. She often perceives herself as a “grenade” that would ultimately harm those around her, especially her family, when she passes away. Despite of her observant condition, Hazel expresses her perception of death throughout the direct dialogue, “forever is an incorrect concept” . Therefore, the relationship between Hazel and her parents is pivotal in order to determine the evolution of Hazel’s “essence” and “existence”, causing her to understand her parents will never view her as a “grenade”

Open Document