Alexander II And The Russian Revolution

388 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Historiography of alexander ii

The relevancy of Alexander II prior to the Russian Revolution is overlooked due to the more prominent successors, such as Alexander III and Nicholas I. That very fact made the method of research unique compared to traditional methods. Since the topic refers to the aftermath of the Russian Revolution, it requires a historian to analyze not only the person of topic, but others who are significant to that same topic. The research primarily focused on the ramifications of Alexander II’s liberalizing actions, but as more research was conducted, the information was leading towards the decisions made by Alexander III and Nicholas I. Finding research pertaining to Alexander II was difficult because Alexander III and, most notably, Nicholas I were

Show More
Related

  • Alexander the Great

    1349 Words  | 3 Pages

    Borza, Eugene N. "Alexander the Great: History and Cultural Politics." Journal of the Historical Society 7.4 (2007): 411-442. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 17 May 2011.

    Read More

  • Assess the impact of World War I on the Fall of the Romanov Dynasty

    968 Words  | 2 Pages

    With the coinciding of a revolution on the brink of eruption and the impacts of the First World War beginning to take hold of Russia, considered analysis of the factors that may have contributed to the fall of the Romanov Dynasty is imperative, as a combination of several factors were evidently lethal. With the final collapse of the 300 year old Romanov Dynasty in 1917, as well as the fall of Nicholas II, a key reality was apparent; the impact that WWI had on autocratic obliteration was undeniable. However, reflection of Russia’s critical decisions prior is essential in the assessment of the cause of the fall of the Romanov Dynasty.

    Read More

  • The More Autocratic Tsar out of Alexander III and Nicholas II

    548 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even though the political system was shadowed by Nicholas' unwillingness to fully democratise, through the fundamental laws (1906) Nicholas had begun to transform Russia into a modernised industrial power. When compared with Alexander's political inactivity, it can be deduced that Alexander was more autocratic than Nicholas. When examining which Tsar was more autocratic, the role of opposition and how it was dealt with should not be overlooked.

    Read More

  • Czar Nicholas II: The Fall Of The Tsar Of Russia

    2251 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Romanov Empire had reign the Russian Empire for about 300 years before Nicholas II became the monarch. Unfortunately, the new Tsar of Russia was also advised by Konstantin Pobedonostsev, who promoted autocracy, condemned elections, representation and democracy, the jury system, the press, free education, charities, and social reforms; an outdated ideology by the turn of the twentieth century. Although Nicholas II possessed some skills that would have been advantageous as the leader but, overall he was not suitable to be the Tsar of Russia. Even though Czar Nicholas II implemented limited reform that were beneficial for the empire; there were more fiascos during his reign thus lies the collapse of the Romanov Empire on his political skill,

    Read More

  • Problems Associated with The Reign of Alexander II (1855-81)

    494 Words  | 1 Pages

    Problems Associated with The Reign of Alexander II (1855-81) The Russian Government faced many problems during the reign of Alexander II, who had tried to solve many of the problems in society. There is a difference of opinion as to how effective Alexander II was in dealing with Russia’s problems. Russia was on the verge of a mass serf rebellion when Alexander II came into power. The serfs thought that landowners had too much control over their lives and that they were basically slaves.

    Read More

  • How successful was Alexander II’s Edict on Emancipation of the Serfs in modernizing Russia in the years 1861-1881?

    3275 Words  | 7 Pages

    The main challenge Alexander II faced in his projects towards modernization of Russia was a compromise between advancing his state thorough improving the lives of his subjects, without falling prey to the demand for further reforms he would be unable to satisfy. Westwood, revisiting Russian History in 1981 phrased the problem as follows: “how to advance the education of the state by educating the people, without educating the people to questions the state? ”.

    Read More

  • The Creation of a Revolutionary in Russia

    787 Words  | 2 Pages

    Edward Dunes’ life as a revolutionary during Russia’s transition from a Tsarist state to that of a Marxist-Socialist regime, was propagated by many situational influences/factors stemming from his families relocation from Riga to Moscow. As a young boy in Riga, Dunes’ thirst for books along with a good educational elevated his potential to be a highly skilled worker. Dune’s childhood education coupled with factory life in Moscow along with a subsequent influential individual in his life with his father’s heavy labor socialist views, molded Dune into the Bolshevik revolutionary he became.

    Read More

  • Bolsheviks' Seizure of Power in 1917

    3146 Words  | 7 Pages

    The political system installed in Russia under the Tsar was long overdue for reform. Russia was a vast empire rather than a single country, and as the Tsar believed in ‘divine right’ he was its supreme ruler, which even with a great, strong charactered ruler, is still a huge task. Nicholas believed in absolute autocracy, and by doing this he did not manage the country well. He could appoint or sack ministers or make any other decisions without consulting anyone else. Unlike most other countries that had at least given them some freedom to say how their country was run, the Tsar was dedicated with the idea of autocracy, and seemed to be obsessed with the great past of his family.

    Read More

  • The Similarities of Tsarist and Communist Rule in Russia

    1871 Words  | 4 Pages

    Alexander II used very little. He had emancipated the serfs, created the zemstva and allowed freedom of religion. Alexander III most resembled Stalin by using the most central controls. He also increased the power of his Predecessors secret police, renaming them the Okrana. The Okrana were similar to Stalin’s secret police (NKVD.) Both were violent against minority groups and Russian’s opposing the state.

    Read More

  • Personal Influence of Grigori Rasputin

    1920 Words  | 4 Pages

    The topic of this investigation is to analyze to what extent did the personal influence of Grigori Rasputin lead to the fall of the Russian Empire. The analysis will investigate the relationship of Rasputin to those in positions of power, starting from the time when Rasputin first treated Alexei to the last days of the Romanov Dynasty. Statements from those acquainted with Rasputin and historical analyses of Rasputin’s life will be analyzed to elucidate the extent of Rasputin’s influence.

    Read More

  • Alexander II as Tsar Liberator

    509 Words  | 2 Pages

    they now had to pay for it. They now had to pay direct taxes and land

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great: Alexander The Great

    1085 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great (July 356BC – June 323BC) was King of the ancient Greek Kingdom of Macedon. By the age of thirty he had created one of the largest empires of the ancient world. He remained undefeated in battle and is considered one of history’s most successful Military commanders. Historians’ have offered theories which could explain Alexander’s motivation to conquer so much of the known world. Some suggest that Alexander was an idealistic visionary who sought to unite the world, whereas others argued that he was a fascist whose hunger for power drove him. The Ancient Greeks were driven by love of honour (philotimaea) and their desire for greatness. They were competitive, always striving to better one another.

    Read More

  • Alexander II

    651 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander II has been considered “a great historical figure without being a great man, that what he did was more important than what he was.” ( W.E Mosse) For 26 years, Czar Alexander II ruled russia. During his reign, he made his mark on history by stepping outside of the box and going to extreme measures to help his people. He has been labeled as the “Liberator of tsar” for the ending of serfdom. Czar Alexander II of Russia has made an impact on history because of his interesting background, fatal assassination, and the changes made after his assassination.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: The First World War

    1431 Words  | 3 Pages

    107-112. World History in Context. Accessed 15 Feb. 2018. Quenoy, Paul Du, and David L. Ruffley. “Tsar Nicholas II: Did the Decision of Tsar Nicholas II to Take Personal Command at the Front Accelerate the Fall of the Russian Empire?”

    Read More

  • Alexander the Second and the Title Tsar Liberator

    816 Words  | 2 Pages

    However, Alexander II was not a whole-hearted reformer. He used the reforms to consolidate the Czardom, instead of catering the needs of people, this could be clearly revealed by the abolition of serfdom, returned of the reactionary rule and no any further serious reform. Therefore, Alexander II could hardly called ‘Czar Liberator’.

    Read More

More about Alexander II And The Russian Revolution

Open Document