Agriculture In Tanzania Essay

1919 Words4 Pages

Being the largest country in Eastern Africa, Tanzania occupies an area of approximately 945, 234 km squared and is comprised of the mainland and three coastal islands (Devisscher, 2010). Indeed, the nation possesses a multitude of differing ecosystems that support not only the local people but also the wider economy (Devisscher, 2010). For many LEDCs, in the modern world agricultural practices are a key activity in not only sustaining life, but also contributing to and maintaining a healthy economy. In particular, there is a significant reliance upon such a sector within Tanzania. It is considered to be the backbone of the Nations economy (Nyoni, 2007), providing over 70% of its population with employment (Sarris et al, 2006). Most notably, such an industry is characterized by smallholder farmers, with the average size of cultivated areas ranging from 1 to 3 hectares (Sarris et al, 2006). The planting of crops such as maize, wheat, beans and cassava accounts for over 85% of the cultivated area (Sarris et al, 2006).
Despite positive economic gains, such widespread agricultural activity has severe ramifications, notably in the degradation and destruction of the environment. Indeed, one of the most pressing issues linked to farming practices is deforestation. Globally, over 30% of forests are thought to have been destroyed, with most destruction occurring in the last 45 years (OSSREA, 2013). In Africa, it is believed that forested regions have been removed at a rate 29 times faster than re-plantation activities during the 1980s (OSSREA, 2013).
In Tanzania alone, a country in which over 1/3 of its area is forested, it is estimated that 1% of its forests are destroyed annually (FAO, 2013). Of particular concern is the continual des...

... middle of paper ...

...ation to location to be successful. In the case of Tanzania and the East Arc Mountains region, it was shown that individuals were prompted by direct annual cash payments as opposed to group payments (Kaczan et al, 2013). Equally, payments in the form of fertilizer proved to be exceedingly attractive to local agriculturalists (Kaczan et al, 2013). Such a payment could result in improving the productivity of agroforestry and other sites, in the long-term reducing the continued fragmentation and destruction of forest as well as the complete conversion of land to open field crops (Kaczan et al, 2013). In turn this would help maintain biodiversity levels of the forest, as well as prevent the exhaustion of soils by supplementing them with nutrients. Such a policy has greater viability by providing financial incentives while addressing several key issues under one policy.

Open Document