Adnan Syed Research Paper

1253 Words3 Pages

“Murder is unique in that it abolishes the party it injures, so that society has to take the place of the victim and on his behalf demand atonement or grant forgiveness; it is the one crime in which society had a direct interest.” - W.H.Auden. Serial, a weekly podcast brings to light a murder from 1999 and it’s safe to say that society has an interest in this case. With over 60 million downloads, the story of 17 years old high school student Adnan Syed being convicted for murder is the subject of many debates; guilty or not guilty. This case -like many others- has copious amounts inconsistencies and uncertainties. Finding the truth about what went down on that January day seems unlikely and absurd. Sarah Koenig (the host) published 12 episodes in the …show more content…

After thoroughly listening and scrutinizing the evidence (or lack thereof) I have come to a conclusion; Adnan Syed is not guilty to the count of first degree murder beyond a reasonable doubt. The three reasons that brought me to this conclusion are the Nisha call, the mosque, and the state's case against Adnan.

Many people such as Sarah Koenig get caught up on the infamous “Nisha Call” when in reality it doesn’t prove guilt, but rather the opposite. For some it is the sole reason why they believe Adnan is guilty, but it is a key reason why I believe he’s innocent. Neither Adnan, Jay or Nisha can remember this call taking place on January 13th, 1999 but the phone records say that it happened and phone records don’t lie. Months after the crime happened the police asked Nisha if she remembered a call with Adnan

Open Document