Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The psychological and physiological effects of guilt
Psychological implication of guilt
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The psychological and physiological effects of guilt
The presumption of innocence is “One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system... the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each essential element of the crime charged,” (“Presumption Of Innocence”). A guilty man can not be charged without evidence of their wrong doing. In 1999, Adnan Syed was arrested for the murder of Hae Min Lee. From the unfair ruling in the court by the bias jurors, and his lawyer getting lost in her argument and missing the sole purpose of the case, even an innocent man would not have walked free. The facts point to him being guilty but, none of the details should have been admissible in the court. Although Adnan Syed did not act alone, he was and still is, a guilty man who was …show more content…
Then again, there was not any hard evidence that linked anybody to being the killer. It all boils down to motive. Adnan had rebelled against his parents strict Muslim upbringings and secretly dated Hae. He risked a lot to continue their relationship; only to be betrayed and have his heart broken by her. Very few positive aspects were remembered from their relationship. A friend of the two recalls Adnan constantly messaging Hae when they were not together and also taking account of when she would come and go. These actions come across as controlling and possessive. After examining the case,state prosecutor, Kevin Urich came to the conclusion that “he became enraged. He felt betrayed that his honor had been besmirched. He became very angry and he set out to kill her,”(Episode 2). Of all the suspects, Adnan Syed had the most probable …show more content…
The letter that stood out the most was one written by Hae to Adnan, post break-up, when they passing notes in class one day. She wrote “I’m really getting annoyed that this situation is going the way it is. You know, people break up all the time, your life will go on. You’ll move on and I’ll move on. But apparently you don’t respect me enough to accept my decision,” (Episode 6) and if that does not raise enough eyebrows then Adnans’ short response will. Written on the top of the page in the pen he had been using to write to Anisha wrote “I’m going to kill,” (Episode 6). This written message along with Jays’ story of it being a premeditated murder adds
This is demonstrated in the case of R v Rogerson and McNamara where two former police officers, Roger Rogerson and Glen McNamara were convicted to life imprisonment based on the murder of Sydney student, Jamie Gao in 2014. Due to the nature of the law, the offenders presumption of innocence was upheld until their conviction in September 2016. Consequently, it created a tedious trial and sentencing process, where extortionate amounts of money were attributed to aspects, such as a judge and jury fees. Additionally, time is also a negative element in this instance where cases under the presumption of innocence, involve extensive hours of litigation and hence an increase in taxpayers
“In the first taped interview, Jay says Adnan only told him that same day that he was going to kill Hae. Two weeks later, Jay says that Adnan had started talking about it beforehand – four or five days
Based on information provided by Sarah Koenig’s podcast, Serial, Hae Min Lee is killed by Adnan Syed, he yet says he didn’t murder her. Adnan is convicted of committing homicide, which he didn’t do, should not be in jail. This is for 3 main accounts; if something important happens a person remembers that day, Jay knew where Hae’s car was, and by how Sarah and her friend go by the day Jay described.
The suspect had a chip tooth and Antonio had A gap that was really the only reason he got convicted. There three other suspects didn’t even get close to how Antonio Beaver had allot of similarity’s like the victim that did that crime. The best way to know if the suspect did the crime is doing allot of deep research instead of just going off a shecht artist.
She’d been strangled. Her 17-year-old ex-boyfriend, Adnan Syed, was arrested for the crime, and within a year, he was convicted and sentenced to spend the rest of his life in prison. The case against him was largely based on the story of one witness, Adnan’s friend Jay, who testified that he helped Adnan bury Hae’s body. But Adnan has always maintained he had nothing to do with Hae’s death. Some people believe he’s telling the truth.
The first piece of evidence against Adnan is a testimony given by his acquaintance and partner-in-crime, Jay. The State uses this as one of their main claims. However, there are many reasons why this was the wrong way to go. First
He told the court Jay had his phone during that time, but Jay and Nisha did not know each other, so why would they talk to each other for two minutes and 22 seconds (Koenig, “The Case Against Adnan Syed”)? In conclusion, there is enough evidence in the Serial Podcast and other information available to say the Adnan Syed was the killer of Hae Min Lee in 1999. Adnan had more reasoning than anyone else to commit this murder. Adnan's family conflicts built up anger inside him, causing his emotions to erupt and murder Hae. Lastly, the phone log and where each call pinged the towers, giving an idea where Adnan was located.
Near the end of the episode, a girl is introduced who claims to clearly remember the day that Hae disappeared. Asia McClain believes that she saw and talked to Adnan in the library the day Hae went missing. She wrote two letters to Adnan and then an affidavit, but she was never contacted by a lawyer. When the case was petitioned, the judge ruled that Asia’s story is legally worthless as an alibi for Adnan because it contradicts his testimony.
To convict one of murder, there must be subjective intent for the accused to be considered guilty. Due to the fact that murder is the most hateful crime of the law, all defendants should have the right to be innocent until proven guilty. There must be verifiable evidence to prove the mens rea.
...nd was not conducted as a part of this investigation. The only evidence that was presented was witness statements after the act, and what was told by investigators at the crime scene. The theory’s of what happen are irrelevant given there are no facts to point to.
Asia claims that she now recounts information that could very well be used as a testimony in court in favor of Adnan. Asia says that not only herself, but her former boyfriend Derrick had seen Adnan on the day of Hae’s death. They had both seen Adnan in the public library that is practically connected to the schools grounds and that they would have seen Adnan around at the time Adnan was supposedly in the car with Hae. Adnan was assumed checking his email on the computer in the public library. Adnan’s alibi supplied by Asia not only proves he is innocent, but that he wasn’t even near the scene of the crime. Although the evidence seems to be game changing, the judge said that Asia can no longer be used due to the longevity of her testimony and can no longer be counted as legitimate proof. Not to mention that the surveillance cameras that the library had previously had is non-existent. And any other witnesses as well. This is extremely off, where were these witnesses during the
On the evening of February 26, 2012 a 17-year old unarmed boy, Trayvon Martin, was shot and killed in Sanford, Florida. Trayvon was killed by a man named Andrew Zimmerman, who stated that self-defense justified the murder of this young boy. An individual who doesn’t know the background of this case would reasonably believe that Trayvon Martin may have attacked Zimmerman, in which he used self-defense. However, Zimmerman was the initial aggressor in this case, whereas he sought after Trayvon Martin for reasons of suspicion. At Zimmerman’s trial on July 13, 2013 the jury reached a verdict of “not guilty” of the murder of Trayvon Martin. So we ask, how does one become acquitted of a murder on self-defense,
...hould have gone to prison for the evidence that they found. And this should stand as a reminder for future police officers that they need to follow all the rules set forth by the 4th amendment and stop this from happening again. Just to save some paperwork the police officers cost them to lose this case and someone who should be in prison is free to do this again.
Walsh, James, and Dan Browning. "Presumed Guilty Until Proved Innocent." Star Tribune (Minneapolis, MN). 23 Jul 2000: A1+. SIRS Issues Researcher.
Jay describes his active-involvement with Adnan in the crime. If Jay tells us the truth, he brings Adnan to school, holds onto Adnan’s cellphone and car so he could pick Adnan up when Adnan calls; picks Adnan up after he committed the murder, cruises around with Adnan, and brings Adnan to track practice. Additionally, Jay cruises around with Adnan in the afternoon, accompanies Adnan to LeakIn park and aids Adnan in digging the hole to bury Hae. Which criminal incriminates oneself? When Jay speaks about picking up Adnan he says: “I noticed that Hae wasn't with him. I parked next to him. He asked me to get out the car. I get out the car. He asks me, am I ready for this? And I say, ready for what? And he takes the keys. He opens the trunk. And all I can see is Hae's lips are all blue, and she's pretzeled up in the back of the trunk. And she's dead.” Jay goes to pick up Adnan from the actual murder and describes the episode in detail. Jay uses short sentences for dramatic effect, and speaks confidently, which is unusual when incriminating