CONFG Case Study

1003 Words3 Pages

As a successor to the VERIFIER system, CONFIG was a good technology that was implemented horribly. Some of the main problems that plagued implementation of CONFIG were lack of employee training, poor interface design, and hardware inaccessibility. With the addition of a lack of motivation from employees who had disincentives to aggregate the system, this resulted in less usage and application across the board. Instead of assuming CONFIG as a “Turkey” or an “Edsel,” we must look at the organizational structure of the companies and make sure the optimization of subprocesses such as the sales representatives does not suboptimize the processes such as new technology that will benefit the company. CONFIG is an important example of how system analysts …show more content…

This seemed like an ideal solution, and worked for a while. Soon after the initial novelty worn off, use of CONFIG went down dramatically over time. Since CONFIG wasn’t built for the users, most of the users could not or wouldn’t take the time to test solutions. Without proper training, users complained about a plethora of issues from too many menus to a lack of shortcuts making most tasks tedious. The IS analysts decided to roll back their initial design to brainstorm new implementations of CONFIG that would be more user …show more content…

Being user friendly, the IS analysts thought that user compliance would boost the usage of the product. Much to the IS analyst’s dismay, surveys concluded that the program had small differences with usage. This problem was due to the socio-economic factors within the company which caused the sales representatives chosen to operate the system to shun the system. These excuses were due to disincentives such a lack pay bonus or reward for using the system, and being obtrusive toward their responsibilities. As sales representatives, they made excuses such as the system being “dirty work” for the manufacturers. Behind the excuses, the process of using the system was sub optimized by the sales representative’s subprocess within the company which was optimized for efficiency. Unfortunately, the IS analysts in charge of the project were not in a position to make changes regarding who used their system. Communication issues between the creators of the product and the managers who employed the product caused this

Open Document