The general theme that surrounds the ‘Social Action’ approach is the rejection of the idea that society is seen to be a well oiled mechanism that influences individuals to behaviour in a pre-defined manner, though it cannot be denied that a ‘social structure’ does exist, but Weber and various other social action theorists, argue that its whole existence, that is society, stems directly from the interventions of the individuals that are at the root of this structure. In adopting this viewpoint, Weber believed that sociologist should focus their attentions on the comprehension of individual human behavioural patterns, in order to uncover a meaning (Haralambos et al. 2004). It was in his 1920s publication ‘Economy and Society’ that Weber wrote “Sociology is a science concerning itself with the interpretive understanding of social action and thereby with a causal explanation of its cause and consequences” (Haralambos et al. 2004, p953).
Weber believed that for any act to be considered a social action, it was important that it had a sense, consequently, through interaction with another person, an individual’s behaviour would be influenced and the outcome altered, this hypothesis strengthens Weber’s perspective, that it is the individual that shapes the world around him and not the world that shapes the individual (Haralambos et al. 2004). For instance, when an individual carrying a pile of books and one of them accidently falls from the stack, this cannot be classed as a social action, whereas, if the book fell as a result of the person attempting to avoid another individual walking towards him, due to the interplay that has occurred, this would be classified as social action (Weber, 1978).
In the 1947 publication ‘Theory of S...
... middle of paper ...
... to the concrete nature attached to the ‘natural sciences’ and finally in the ‘natural sciences’, a simple observation could lead to a full understanding, this was not the case for the ‘social sciences, according to Weber, it was necessary to focus on the motivations related to an act and consequently its correlation to social action (Morrison, 1995).
Bibliography
Craib, I. (1984) Modern Social Theory. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.
Eldridge, J.E.T (1972) Max Weber: The Interpretation of Social Reality. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons Limited.
Haralambos et al. (2004) Sociology: Themes and Perspectives. 6th Edition. Hammersmith: HarperCollins Publishers Limited.
Morrison, K. (1995) Marx, Durkheim, Weber: Formations of Modern Social Thought. London: Sage Publications Limited.
Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Three thinkers form the foundations of modern-day sociological thinking. Émile Durkheim, Karl Marx, and Max Weber. Each developed different theoretical approaches to help us understand the way societies function, and how we are determined by society. This essay will focus on the contrasts and similarities of Durkheim and Weber’s thought of how we are determined by society. It will then go on to argue that Weber provides us with the best account of modern life.
1b. Provide an analysis of pages 298-303 (starting at […] on 298 and ending at “employer’s organized life. […]”) of Weber’s “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism” in the Calhoun reader. Identity with specific reference to the text what is the key argument that Weber develops in this section.
The preliminary to fruitful discussion of social matters is that certain obstacles shall be overcome, obstacles residing in our present conceptions of the method of social inquiry. One of the obstructions in the path is the seemingl...
Society, in simplest terms, is defined as a group of people who share a defined territory and a culture. In sociology, we take that definition a little further by arguing that society is also the social structure and interactions of that group of people. Social structure is the relatively enduring patterns of behavior and relationships within a society, not only between its members, but also with social institutions. According to those definitions, society seems a fairly concrete concept to comprehend. However, there are sociologists whom have their own theories about society in the aspects of the relationship between social classes, and class conflict. The German philosopher, economist and theorist Karl Marx has a fragmented and rather disconsolate view on society; while French functionalist and theorist Emile Durkheim looks at society more scientifically and wholesomely. Despite these profound differences of outlook, however, Marx and Durkheim were both centrally concerned with the emergence of modern capitalism, and in particular with the rise of the modern system of the division ...
Max Weber and Karl Marx, two prolific Sociologists who share different views with the origins and development of modern capitalism. They wanted to understand the rise of capitalism, the causes of it, as well as the direction it was heading. As they started to dissect capitalism they developed two separate conclusions generated from completely different factors. It’s hard to fathom the fact that Weber and Marx could arrive at two distinct conclusions while studying a similar event. They took two separate angles of approach, which caused them to have to opposing theories. Due too Weber and Marx approaching capitalism from different angles, their views of the dynamics, and the understanding of the origins differed.
Weber, on the other hand, tried to look at the macro-sociological phenomenon in his explanation. Weber felt that there is just more than one explanation for the causes of change. Marx’s perspective was not based on the conflict of ideas, but rather on the conflict of classes. This conflict is the result of a new mode of production. According to Marx, history would consist of epochs of modes of production.
Shortell, Timothy. "Weber's Theory of Social Class." Weber's Theory of Social Class. Brooklyn College, n.d. Web.
Introducing cultural studies, London: Prentice Hall Bilton, et al. (1996) Introductory Sociology 3rd ed, London: Macmillan Press LTD. Blauner, R. (1964) Alienation and freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Chicago Press Bottomore, T.B., Rubel, M.(eds) (1963) Karl Marx: Selected writings in sociology and social philosophy, Penguin: Harmondsworth
While sociologists have often studied social change, Max Weber was particularly focused on understanding the progression of rationalization. Many of his works detail his analysis of the growth of rationality in the Western world, as well as the development of bureaucracies as a sign of this process. Although his argument that the modern world is marked by an increase in both does provide a valuable and multifaceted view, it does have its problems. Namely, Weber’s conceptualization of rationality fails to properly separate the different forms, which weakens his subsequent argument on the growth of rationality. In contrast, Weber is highly effective in determining the characteristics of bureaucracies, which allows for a strong discussion on increasing bureaucratization.
In the framework of classical sociological theory, numerous sources, including Ritzer, investigate this brave new world of unified science and empirical foundation. They are moving amidst the "theory park" of speculative philosophical systems in sociology and yet they are turning to theoretical applications such as elementarist, holistic, and interactionist approaches. This technique is employed in order to make classical social theory more meaningful and to better engage theory with useful research (Sandywell, p. 607).
23 Rogers Brubaker, The Limits of Rationality: An Essay on the Social and Moral Thought of Max Weber (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1984), pp. 5 and 6.
Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels, and Robert C. Tucker. The Marx-Engels reader. 2nd ed. New York: Norton, 1978. Print.
Weber believes each society is different and comes up with ideal typical constructs to explain a certain society. His starting point for his theory is meaningful social action. Weber believes that humans are naturally valuing beings who carry certain values and interpret natural and social factors based on their values. Humans are conscious creatures who attach meaning towards an act which is directed towards another individual. Weber is concerned with social action, its subjective meaning and the unintended consequences of the actions. According to Weber, structure is a result of action which in return affects the individuals who are responsible for setting up the structure.
Max Weber had much to say about the organization of capitalism and the disparity of the system, but unlike others, Weber also paid a lot of attention to the traditional, non-monetary incentives underlying social action. Weber wrote extensively about religion, though both he and Durkheim had a functional perspective on religion. Weber was more concerned with the functional perspective of religion while Durkheim focused particularly on how social order was possible within a religious context. Weber’s idea of the iron cage was significant as he believed that society was no longer driven by non- physical conception, such as religious values but instead by economic interests. He believed that work shouldn’t be just our occupation and inclination; Weber believe that the strains of our capitalist society has become so prevalent and governing that we are forced into fulfilling rational costs to benefit the expectations of the capitalist marketplace. Thus Max Weber asserts that in order to relinquish rational control we must live in this so called iron cage for the greater good on society. “Furthermore the puritans believed that fate decreed that the cloak should become an iron cage” (lecture November 6, 2013)[Footnote]. He further stated these ideal were that material goods have gained an increasing and ultimately an unavoidable power. The material goods has contributed to keeping us trapped in this iron cage, and for many individuals it has become the rational choice to stay there, rather than to follow the values of religion. Weber would conclude that within our society today, we have given the attitude of involved reasonableness which pervades so many aspects of our lives and of our culture as a whole; creating an iron cage of econom...