Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Philosopher friedrich nietzsche essay
Nietzsche the idea of death of God with conclusion
Philosopher friedrich nietzsche essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) has born as a philologist and not as a philosopher, even though his innovating way of thinking, influenced remarkably the view on the meaning of life within the whole modern Europe.
It is considered one of those great minds, as Marx and Freud, which have been able to create a new ideology to rely on, to create a new perspective both socially and psychologically, to give human kind a chance to open to the true consciousness, to revaluate the ethics of life and the true moral values.
Nietzsche represents the philosophy of symbolism and metaphor, sometimes more clear and detailed, some other times more fragmentary and poetic.
In order to progress within the psychological asset of the world’s big picture, Nietzsche relies on ‘historical philosophizing’ which he considered as the first attempt to draw the consequences of human history intellectual epochs; his main works focus on the political and social situation in Europe, particularly within Germany during the 19th century, which according to the philosopher, expresses the psychological realm of human beings, during his epoch.
To truly understand the aim of his philosophy, it is necessary to explore the meaning of one of his most famous claims, namely the Death of God, still widely discussed.
At first, it is very interesting that such a claim derives from a man, Nietzsche, born in a family of Lutheran ministers, someone grown up within a religious setting, who has been studying theology and the others main holy books. In Nietzsche’s case, instead of increasing his faith in religion, his investigative essence played the role of leading to consider himself the first perfect Nihilist. I will come back to this point hereinafter.
Furthermore, it is also i...
... middle of paper ...
...thics and Nihilism in Reginster’s The Affirmation Of Life.The Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 43 (1), 99-117. Penn State University Press.
Nietzsche, F., (1888, 1895). The Antichrist, trans. Mencken. New York, Alfred Knopf. Available online at URL http://www.gutenberg.org/files/19322/19322-h/19322-h.htm
Nietzsche, F., (1891). Thus Spoke Zarathustra, trans. Common. Available online at URL http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1891nietzsche-zara.asp
Nietzsche, F., (1882, 1887). The Gay Science. Available online at URL http://nietzsche.holtof.com/Nietzsche_the_gay_science/the_gay_science.htm
Samuel, A., (2007). Nietzsche and God (Part I). Richmond Journal of Philosophy, 14.
Stern, J.P., (1980). Guida a Nietzsche. Rizzoli Editore. Milano.
Tubert, A., (2006). Bernard Reginster, The Affirmation of Life: Nietzsche on Overcoming Nihilism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
philosophers I am concentrating on are Marx and Nietzsche. I also will look at how Freud’s
Friedrich Nietzsche was a brilliant and outspoken man who uses ideas of what he believe in what life is about. He did not believe in what is right and wrong because if who opposed the power. Nietzsche was against Democracy because how they depend on other people to make some different or change, while Nietzsche believe they should of just pick the ones that were gifted and talent to choose what to change. Nietzsche also does not believe in Aristocracy because how they depend on an individual person to create the rules or change those benefits for him. As you see Nietzsche did not like how they depend on one person to decide instead of each person to decide for himself for their own benefits.
Both Freud and Nietzsche presented almost the same interpretations of human nature and the society they lived in. Though, the societies in which they lived in were different. Freud and Nietzsche’s thoughts may be similar, but human nature constantly changes. Freud is more aware, he examines into the past to find reasons that make life more civilized, however Nietzsche is more doubtful, he sees that humans should be led by a hero.
...Hence he concluded that individuals of a society governed by capitalism risked falling into a state of nihilism bereft of meaning. Moreover, the solution he believed was that of a superhuman. A superhuman understands life’s lack of intransience and consequentially looks within for meaning. However, life’s transitory quality results in the superhuman having to constantly recreate in order to overcome the continuously new obstacles thrown at him. Correspondingly, Nietzsche ascertains the quest for satiation of one’s hedonistic insatiable desires, is the greatest strength for a superhuman. This is chiefly due to it being the underlying source for man’s insatiable desire to overcome. Coincidentally, the syntax, as noted by Ginsberg, is one of a pyramidal structure. The monotonic crescendo, symbolizes Solomon’s growing madness and its correlation with a heightened joy.
When Nietzsche claims that God is dead he is not making an empirical claim about God’s existence, nor even merely about the state of belief in his existence. His claim is that the conceptual relationship between God and the ‘Truth’ fundamentally changed with the Enlightenment. Previously ‘Truth’ was understood via its relationship with God; Nietzsche argues that:
Leiter, Brian. “Nietzsche’s Moral and Political Philosophy.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, CSLI, Stanford University, 26 August 2004.
The aim of this paper is to provide a detailed explanation on Nietzsche’s concept of eternal recurrence, and then proceeds to determine whether such a concept results in the betterment of a free spirit’s life, or whether this is not the case. Before determining whether the concept has a positive outcome or not, it is important to provide a detailed...
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Will to Power, trans. Walter Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale, ed. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Random House, 1967).
P. 38-39, Friedrich Nietzsche, “Beyond Good and Evil” Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy, translated by Judith Norman, Cambridge University Press, 2002
Martin Heidegger (1889 -- 1976) was, and still is considered to be, along with the likes of Soren Kierkegaard, Edmund Husserl and Jean-Paul Sartre, one of the principal exponents of 20th century Existentialism. An extraordinarily original thinker, a critic of technological society and the leading Ontologist of his time, Heidegger's philosophy became a primary influence upon the thoughts of the younger generations of continental European cultural personalities of his time.
Madigan, P. The Modern Project to Rigor: Descartes to Nietzsche. Landham: UP of America, 1986.
Madigan, P. The Modern Project to Rigor: Descartes to Nietzsche. Landham: UP of America, 1986.
On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense, Nietzsche. United States of America: Bedford/St.Martin's, 2001. 1171-1179. Print
Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals can be assessed in regards to the three essays that it is broken up into. Each essay derives the significance of our moral concepts by observing
Nietzsche, Friedrich. "Human, All Too Human by Friedrich Nietzsche: From the Soul of Artists and Writers." Classic Authors.net / Great Literature Online. Web. 18 Feb. 2011. .