Abortion rights Organization vs Judge Roberts

  • Length: 840 words (2.4 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

More ↓

Continue reading...

Open Document

Abortion rights organizations declared their opposition to Roberts, a 50-year-old federal appeals court judge. But as yet, there were no outright calls for his rejection from any of the Senate's 44 Democrats.

"I urge the Senate to rise to the occasion, provide a fair and civil process and to have Judge Roberts in place before the next court sessions begins on October the third," said President Bush, the morning after he tapped the Harvard-educated lawyer with a sterling resume and impeccable conservative credentials.

If confirmed, Roberts would replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the court. She has frequently been a swing vote in recent years on issues ranging from abortion to affirmative action and states rights.

That made Roberts' nomination a potential political flash point in the Senate and beyond.

Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, Republican chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said hearing would begin in late August or more likely early September.

"And I can assure you that the hearings will be full, fair and complete," he told reporters in the Capitol.

Roberts had breakfast with Bush at the White House, but did not speak to reporters. He saved his talking for later in the day, when the White House scheduled the first in a series of "courtesy calls" on senators who will ultimately decide whether he takes his place on the high court.

His first stop was in the office of Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee, who has pledged to meet Bush's goal of completing the confirmation proceedings before the court's new term begins on October 3.

Roberts also had a meeting with Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid on his schedule.

Bush's pick "has had an impressive legal career" and other fine qualities, the Nevada lawmaker said in remarks on the Senate floor during the day.

But, he added, "they do not automatically qualify John Roberts to serve on the highest court of the land."

He said senators "must be convinced that the nominee will respect constitutional principles and protect the constitutional rights of all Americans."

Abortion surfaced quickly as a point of contention.

A liberal organization, NARAL-Pro Choice America, announced its opposition to Roberts even before Bush formally made his selection public in a prime time televised White House appearance on Tuesday. The group planned an "emergency demonstration" against the nomination across the street from the Capitol at midday.

On the other side of the political equation, Progress For America, a conservative organization, called a news conference to announce a television commercial to begin running soon.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Abortion rights Organization vs Judge Roberts." 123HelpMe.com. 19 Jun 2018
Title Length Color Rating  
Essay on Women’s Reproductive Rights Are In Danger - The battle for women’s reproductive rights is similar to the struggle for African Americans to have “the full liberty of speech in public and private” as Dredd Scott found out in 1865 when he petitioned for his personal freedom from slavery and lost. Moreover women’s reproductive rights are akin to defending the rights of racial equality, civil rights, desegregation, same sex marriage, and universal human rights. Every individual should have the right to choose how to live his or her private life in today’s society without governmental interference or control....   [tags: The Supreme Court vs Pro-choice]
:: 3 Works Cited
1738 words
(5 pages)
Term Papers [preview]
Reproduction and Abortion Rights in Poland Essays - Should a woman have control over her body, and with that make reproductive choices. Reproduction and abortion have been a controversial topic for over fifty years. Some people argue pro-life while others argue pro-choice. Who should have the right to choose for women. Poland, along with many other Central-Eastern European countries, believe that the choice should be in the hands of the state, government, and more importantly the church. Poland is located in central-eastern Europe, and had approximately 38.7 million people as of 2003 (Center For Reproductive Rights, 2003)....   [tags: Abortion Essays]
:: 10 Works Cited
1455 words
(4.2 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Pro- Abortion and the Rights of the Mother Essay example - Abortion is a controversial subject in today’s world. One side believes that taking away the right to have an abortion is taking away the rights of the mother. On the other hand people view abortion as the innocent killing of a human being. (p.31OpposingViewpoints) The Roe vs. Wade trial declared the procedure a “fundamental right” on Jan. 22 1973(p.7RoeW.Wade)The mother has the right to choose what is best for her baby. Abortion is justified because it could be in the family’s best interest (p.103OpposingViewpoints)....   [tags: mother, abortion, interest, baby]
:: 8 Works Cited
617 words
(1.8 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
The Status of Human Rights in China Essay - There are many human rights being violated in China. Throughout these years citizens of China have been forced to have abortion, denied freedom of religion and sold children into slavery. There is no way of changing the grave effects of the people in China. Equality should be greatly enforced. In China if families have too many children they are forced to have abortions. Women are drugged and put out of their misery in order to give up their baby. The government’s punishment to these women is horrid, traumatizing and no girl should be forced to go through this....   [tags: Human Rights Violations, Abortions]
:: 8 Works Cited
1118 words
(3.2 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
America's Abortion Debate Essay - Abortion is one of the most controversial issues in the United States today. According to oxford dictionary, abortion is the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, most often performed during the first 28 weeks. The two factions involved in this controversy are poles apart in their views on abortion: where as the pro-choice movement contends that a woman’s right to abortion is absolute, the pro-life movement asserts that a fetus’s right to life is indisputable. The argument has become very pronounced since the U.S Supreme Court ruling in the year 1973 in Roe V....   [tags: Abortion]
:: 2 Works Cited
860 words
(2.5 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Mens Rights Concerning Abortion Essay - Abortion is sometimes used as a way to discontinue a pregnancy that a female decides she is not wanting to proceed with. Harris makes an argument on a number of cases where a female lies to her companion about pursuing a life involving birthing an infant. In the Decision To Abort article it states, “Harris's argument for this position rests on his discussion of a series of cases in which a woman lies to her partner about her desire to have children. She then becomes pregnant, accidentally. Upon learning of her pregnancy, her partner begs her to carry this fetus to term....   [tags: Abortion Essays]
:: 8 Works Cited
953 words
(2.7 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay about Abortion and Human Rights - Abortion and Human Rights The most important issue in balancing individual human rights with social responsibility in my point of view is abortion. The law that was passed so that abortions would be legal was a good decision. The anti-abortions have very sound points, but it should be up to the women to make her choice. Abortion has been debated for decades and always will be. Ever since Roe vs. Wade, abortion has been a very hot topic. When Jane Roe sued for the right to have an abortion she was pregnant with an unwanted child....   [tags: Human Rights Essays] 349 words
(1 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
The Abortion Debate Essay - One subject in society that is greatly debated is abortion. The debates are basically divided into 'Pro-Life' and 'Pro-Choice'. Pro-life supporters want abortion to be illegal and not performed anywhere. Pro-choice supporters want the choice to be up to the woman and no one else. There is no ethical way to decide between the two subjects and it's all based on what the person's moral values.      Abortion is the termination of an unwanted pregnancy by loss of or destruction of an egg, embryo or fetus before birth....   [tags: Ethics Abortion Abortions Essays] 1066 words
(3 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Michèle Roberts’s The Looking Glass Essay - Michèle Roberts’s The Looking Glass The understanding of history as a linear and unproblematic narrative, dominated by kings and queens, warriors and heroes, has long been denied by women writers. As Linda Anderson argues, these events ‘take on a different meaning, a different configuration when we begin to see through them – in both senses – to women’s concealed existence in the private sphere of family and home’ (Anderson, p.130). Women have little place in traditional linear history and have come to deny its authority and question its dominance....   [tags: Michele Roberts Looking Glass Essays]
:: 10 Works Cited
6379 words
(18.2 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Abortion Essay - Should abortion be allowed in the United States. If so, then under what circumstances. Abortion has been one of the most heatedly debated topics in the U.S. for more than a century. This paper explores the history and international use of abortion, as well as the empirical and moral claims made by both sides of the issue. We will also examine the key positions taken on abortion and look at those affected by it. Based on extensive research and analysis, this paper will recommend that the government increase abortion funding and availability....   [tags: Increase Abortion Availability]
:: 20 Works Cited
4126 words
(11.8 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]

Related Searches

The group, which coordinates its efforts with presidential aides, pledged in advance to spend at least $18 million on advertising and grass roots activities to buttress the confirmation prospects of whomever Bush chose.

Abortion, a polarizing issue for lawmakers, will be the "hot button" issue in the confirmation battle, conceded Fred Thompson, the former senator who will shepherd the nomination through the Senate.

At the same time, he cautioned against reading too much into Roberts' various writings on Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion.

"Many of the positions he's taken are positions he took as an advocate ... representing a client," said Thompson.

Specter, who supports abortion rights, said he was disappointed that some liberal organizations view Roberts as unsuitable over the issue of abortion.

He did say, though, that he felt it appropriate to ask Roberts about his previous statement that Roe v. Wade was settled law. "If he said it's settled law, it would be relevant to confirm the fact that has been said," Specter said.

Democrats raised questions and said they would await the hearing to seek answers.

"If he wants to be on the Supreme Court, he has to be more forthcoming .... to convince the American people that a man who could serve on the court for 20 to 30 years really is in the mainstream of American thinking," said Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Illinois, who is a member of the Judiciary Committee.

Democratic concern over Roberts' abortion views stem from two seemingly contradictory positions that Roberts took on Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion.

In a brief that he filed with the Supreme Court while serving as deputy solicitor general in the administration of the first President Bush, Roberts said that Roe v. Wade "was wrongly decided and should be overruled."

Several years later, he told senators during his 2003 confirmation hearing for his current appellate court post that the decision was "the settled law of the land."

Thompson said the administration expects lawmakers to ask tough questions about Roberts' abortion views. But he also said they should distinguish between Roberts' role as a policy advocate as a one-time deputy solicitor general in a Republican administration and his contrasting role as a jurist.

"It's not a question of whose side he's on," Thompson said. "He's on the side of the litigant that comes into court with the facts and the law on their side. And he will not be prejudging any cases before the committee or anyone else."

Return to 123HelpMe.com