Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
necessity of affirmative action
impact of affirmative action on society
effects of affirmative action on education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: necessity of affirmative action
Although much of the reasoning behind Affirmative Action is good, it goes wrong in a few major ways. Affirmative action is meant to bring an end to discrimination. In trying to do so, though, it elevates the so-called disadvantaged minorities above other groups. In addition, the members of the particular minority groups are stereotyped according to the group they are in rather than being looked at as an individual. Affirmative action also makes the assumption that minority groups are, in fact, disadvantaged. Another result is that the tables are turned and whites are discriminated against. Lastly, and most importantly, Affirmative Action can force people to go against their religious beliefs, and in doing so, it breaks the First Amendment to the Constitution.
To begin with, Affirmative Action is meant to bring an end to discrimination. In reality, it creates more discrimination in many different ways. For example, members of minorities are elevated above those in other groups. As the book states, Affirmative Action "seeks to correct the effects of past discrimination by favoring the groups who were previously disadvantaged. Favoring one group isn't any way of solving discrimination problems; it just creates more dissension between groups.
According to Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, discrimination means "to mark or perceive the distinguishing or peculiar features of." Affirmative Action directly creates discrimination. People of minority groups are stereotyped, often incorrectly, as being disadvantaged, simply because they are a member of that group. Not only is it stereotyping of minorities, but also of whites. It creates the assumption that whites are better off than minorities. Affirmative Action looks at the members of a group and makes assumptions, stereotyping the members in the group rather than taking each member of the group and examining that person. Members of minority groups often feel inferior because, as members of those groups, they get special privileges.
According to the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the government cannot make laws "respecting an establishment of religion." The government cannot both support Affirmative Action and uphold the first amendment at the same time. The goals, actions, and restrictions resulting from Affirmative Action can easily be against a person's religious beliefs. Take, for example, beliefs on homosexuality. What happens to a religious organization that is against homosexuality and wants to have only straight members of their religion hired. According to Affirmative Action, they can't discriminate based on sexual orientation or religion.
Memory is not reliable; memory can be altered and adjusted. Memory is stored in the brain just like files stored in a cabinet, you store it, save it and then later on retrieve and sometimes even alter and return it. In doing so that changes the original data that was first stored. Over time memory fades and becomes distorted, trauma and other events in life can cause the way we store memory to become faulty. So when focusing on eyewitnesses, sometimes our memory will not relay correct information due to different cues, questioning, and trauma and so forth, which makes eyewitness even harder to rely on. Yet it is still applied in the criminal justice system.
From its points of origin, the intended use of affirmative action is to ensure that employees and applicants of jobs are treated equally regardless of their race, religion, and national origin. There is no question about this being the right approach. But, as mentioned in the article, when a company qualifies for government subsidies just for selecting a minority over equally qualified non-minorities, it's difficult to argue that affirmative action is working the way it's supposed to be.
In the eternal exploration into understanding the complex criminal mind, a multitude of theories, in the study of criminology, have flourished. Among these theories is the nature vs nurture debate, which suggest that criminal behavior is either genetically inherited or a consequence of environmental influence. These two views on criminal causation differ in many ways but they are not without their similarities.
In the court of law, eyewitnesses are expected to present evidence based upon information they acquired visually. However, due to memory processing, presenting this information accurately is not always possible. This paper will discuss the reliability of eyewitness testimony, its use in a relevant court case, and how the reasonable person standard relates to eyewitness testimony.
Hoscheidt, LaBar, Ryan, Jacobs, and Nadel (2014) explored the effects on the witness memory when they have been given false information for a traumatizing event set under stress. To test this, they randomly divided college students into a stress and a control group and also a misinformation and no misinformation group. Each group underwent the TSSP (trier social stress procedure) in three different sessions that were held 48 hours apart. Their finding showed that being stressed before a new memory is created for a traumatic event can enhance subsequent memory. This is just one example of how stress can affect memory. This relates to the present study because it discuss how witnesses that are stressed and it affects their memories which could lead to an inaccurate testimony. Researcher have also look at other factors besides stress to try to determine what else might cause an eyewitness testimony to be inaccurate. Pozzulo and colleagues (2008) investigated the effects of live vs. video exposure of a crime, as well as stress’s effect on identification accuracy. Participants were randomly assigned to 4 different conditions and they were asked to rate their stress levels after being presented with their conditioned line up. They found that stress or the way they participant were exposed to the act had no
"Ronald Cotton." Innocenceproject.org. Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University. Web. 26 Feb. 2012.
In a TedTalk concerning the dubious reliability of an eyewitness at the scene of a crime, forensic psychologist Scott Fraser explores the conviction of Francisco Carrillo and the fallible nature of the brain in encoding, storing, and retrieving memories. With the use of critical thinking and research based knowledge, discussed are the speaker’s claims, reactions to the talk, and a personal evaluation of eyewitness memory.
Affirmative action was created to assist minority groups against discrimination, but affirmative action does more harm than what it can do to help. Affirmative action was created with the intention of leveling the playing field so that everyone can have an equal opportunity to be hired or accepted in to a school, but it does the opposite of what it is meant to do. Affirmative action is reverse discrimination against white males, lesser qualified people are admitted into jobs and colleges, and not all people have an equal opportunity to advance.
When people talk about the civil rights movement, the first thing that comes to mind is the famous speech “I have a dream” by Martin Luther King. His dream in short was to have equality among human beings. For the past thirty years, this country has been revolutionizing humanitarianism because there is greater concern for human welfare than one hundred years ago. The revolution began during the 1960’s, and during that era this country was drastically involved in changing the civil rights of minority groups. From this concern, a program called affirmative action evolved. Like other civil right movements, the affirmative action movement was implemented to promote equality.
In his essay “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire”, Matthew Warshauer supports the idea that nowadays, Americans care more about gaining easy money and buying consumer goods rather than actually working hard. Arthur Miller’s play Death of a Salesman supports most of these ideas, but it contradicts the idea that all people are just concerned with making easy money. In Miller’s play, some characters, such as Willy (from early on in the play) and Bernard genuinely work hard to try to make an honest living.
The human mind is not like a tape recorder; we don’t record events exactly as we see them and we don’t recall them as clearly when we try to replay them in our heads. Eyewitnesses are not a special case. They’re the same as each and every one of us and are unable to recall events exactly like they happened and undergo different factors that could cause their memories to be distorted or influenced and therefore inaccurate. Most jurors’ find eyewitnesses and their identifications to be reliable and are unable to tell if what is being said is true. Given the persuasive nature of eyewitness evidence, as well as the inherent danger of misidentifications, it is imperative that the procedures of the criminal justice system contribute to these problems in order to ensure that the most reliable evidence possible makes it into a courtroom and before a jury. There is research that not only indicates but also supports the hypothesis of this study by stating that, “…the current framework for evaluating the admissibility of eyewitness identification evidence does
According to the Encyclopædia Britannica, affirmative action is “an active effort to improve employment or educational opportunities for members of minority groups and women.” However, despite its well-intentioned policies, it has been the source of much controversy over the years. Barbara Scott and Mary Ann Schwartz mention that “proponents of affirmative action argue that given that racism and discrimination are systemic problems, their solutions require institutional remedies such as those offered by affirmative action legislation” (298). Also, even though racism is no longer direct, indirect forms still exist in society and affirmative action helps direct. On the other hand, opponents to affirm...
To be a successful business, the owner of the business should use the marketing mix and the results of market research; having identified its key audience a company has to ensure a marketing mix is created that is targeted specifically to those people. The marketing mix is a term used to describe the four main marketing tools, Price, Product, Promotion and Place (EStartup business blog, 2010). An example of each 4P’s are: which products are well received, what prices consumers are willing to pay, what TV programs, newspapers and advertising consu...
I feel that affirmative action encourages people to look at sex, color or race as a factor during the employment or admissions process, when our goal should be to eliminate it. Affirmative action encourages "reverse racism". Reverse racism is when an employer and college admission representative discriminates against individuals from majority groups.
To create a successful marketing mix you must have all of the following aspects: the right product for your target market, sold to your target market at the appropriate price,in the right place and time, while using the most fitting promotion. ( Marketing Theory 1995.) The product, price, place, and promotion all are of uttermost importance in a business, since all businesses must complete all of these activities, including advertising agencies and research firms, everybody in the business world should understand the marketing mix.