Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
mending wall by robert frost explainations
mending wall by robert frost explainations
mending wall by robert frost explainations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: mending wall by robert frost explainations
Our traditions act as a compass for our human relationships and personal interactions, the qualitative experiences of our family life, and ultimately, the development of societies. As we honor traditions, so we learn to honor ourselves and each other. The poem “Mending Wall” by Robert Frost and the story “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson both contain examples of seemingly senseless traditions. The thought of people doing something senselessly, just to appease the continuance of something that was done by their forefathers seems foolish unless there is some sort of positive result from their actions. The question is what results are positive enough to go through the effort. This means that as time progresses some traditions deserve to fade while others deserve to stay bright even though the reason why may not always be evident.
A grand example of a tradition that deserves to fade with time comes from “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson. Through this story, one learns that the end result of the lottery, which is played by the town folks, is the death of one of their citizens. There are hints throughout the story to explain why the lottery is played in the town. The most prevalent explanation is given by a character named Old Man Warner who said “Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon” (Jackson 31). This shows the most reasonable explanation for this group’s participation in the tradition, they call the lottery, is to increase the yield of their crops through human sacrifice.
This sounds horrible to the modern ear because human sacrifice is not just frowned upon, it is punishable by the government in most parts of the world. In a less civilized time, however, the sacrifice seems reasonable. Sacrifice one life, once a year, to have a harvest that can feed the town throughout the year. The loss of one for many, when said like this the winner of the lottery should feel lucky to have the opportunity to save the rest of the town from a hard year and increase the overall vitality of the town. Of course, this concept is even more appealing for those who lose the lottery because not only do they get to live, they get to live comfortably.
Jackson is trying to prove that in small towns, tradition means everything and is a way to link families and generations. However, at the same time, the author is also trying to shed light that not all traditions are worth preserving. The acceptance of the ritual murder lottery has become engrained in the town fabric. The ordinary residents of the town have no reason to kill their own peers other than by tradition. No one in Jackson’s story stops to question their judgment on wh...
Shirley Jacksons short story “The Lottery” is bout traditions and sacrifice. The people of their village followed the tradition even though they had to sacrifice greatly for them. In the story the village people all gathered for a lottery but if you got it someone in your family would die for the tradition but it blessed the crops. Traditions can be good or bad.
Tradition; it is the back bone of every culture and civilization. It is what keeps the beliefs, philosophies, and activities of societies alive, to be passed down from generation to generation. However not all traditions are practiced with pure intentions. Some activities become so routine, people don’t know a life outside of them. Societies become so accustomed to “tradition” that they will participate in pastimes without questioning the ethics or morals of the situation. Ultimately when tradition takes the place of a rationalizing mind the outcome can be incredibly dangerous. The role of tradition is an underlying theme in the short story The Lottery by Shirley Jackson, forcing readers to ask themselves “At what point do people set tradition aside and realize the thoughtlessness of their actions in their practices?”
The use of comedy was usually through sexual puns and double entendre like “ ’Tis true, and therefore women, being the weaker vessels, are ever thrust to the wall. Therefore I will push Montague’s men from the wall and thrust his maids to the wall” (1.1.15-18) and “My naked weapon is out. Quarrel, I will back thee.”(1.1.33-34).These sexual puns almost always solved the problems with traditional comedy not being funny to all social classes nor mindsets. The other type of comedy in the play was more traditional like the panicked start of the fight at the beginning “Do you bite your thumb at us, sir? I do bite my thumb sir. Do you bite your thumb at us, sir? [Aside to Gregory] Is the law of our side if I say “Ay”? [Aside to Sampson] no. No, sir, I do not bite my thumb at you, sir, but I bite my thumb sir.”(1.1.44-52). This comedy also broke the wall between the social classes and mindsets since scenes like this were funny to almost everyone. Both types of comedy usually were funny to almost everyone since they did not depend on certain situations which only a select few would usually experience. Thus this made the play even better at its purpose of entertainment.
William Shakespeare is the author of the comedy play ‘A Midsummer Nights Dream’. This play was written around 1595. In this essay I will be answering the question how does Shakespeare creates humour in act 5 scene 1. There are many reasons as to how the play was humorous; one of the main reasons was the staging you would have the real audience, the court on the stage and on the original stage you would have the mechanicals perform. The other reasons on how Shakespeare creates humour are with the characters (fairies, court and mechanicals) and the repetitive incorrect use of language and errors. An example of this could be when in act 5 scene 1 Bottom says ‘O grim looked night, O night …….
Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery” is a chilling tale of a harsh ritualistic gathering conducted by people of a small village. The word lottery would typically remind someone of a drawing to win a cash prize. A better comparison to the story would be the lottery used to select troops for the Vietnam War; a lottery of death. Another would be the human sacrifices the Aztecs willingly made long ago.
The characters in this story are extremely stubborn about the traditions that they follow. Most of them continue with it because they do not want to be exiled from society. They keep the tradition going just because they feel that it is the right thing to do no matter how horrifying the
Americans day after day live much of their lives following time-honored traditions that are passed down from one generation to another. From simple everyday cooking and raising children, to holidays and other family rituals, tradition plays a significant role on how they go by there everyday lives. In Shirley Jackson's short story, "The Lottery," the citizens of a small farming town follow one such tradition. A point is made regarding human nature in relation to tradition. The story begins on a beautiful summer afternoon. The town's citizens are eager, gathering in the town square in order to take part in the yearly lottery. With the story focused around one particular family, the Hutchinsons, who are so anxious to get it all over with until they find that one of their members is to participate in the lottery's closing festivities, Tessie. Of course unlike your typical lotteries, this is not one that you would want to win. The one chosen from the lottery is to undertake a cruel and unusual death by stoning at the hands of their fellow townsmen for the sake that it may bring a fruitful crop for the coming harvest season. Ironically, many of the towns people have suggested that the lottery be put to an end, but most find the idea unheard of being that they have lived in it's practice for most of their lives. The story conveys a message that traditions may be valued so highly that those in their practice may do everything they can to ensure that they continue in accordance. From this a question arises. How far would one go to ensure their sacred traditions remain unscathed?
In The Lottery, inhumane and cruel traditions are the general plot of the story. Once a year, the town randomly chooses a person to sacrifice in a process known as the lottery. The ‘winner’ of the lottery could be anyone: all the citizens of the town have an equal chance of being picked. The friends and family of the winner immediately turn against them and instinctively lose any feelings of respect for the person and begin to stone them to death. Tradition is tradition and the lottery is all that anyone has ever known. The town doesn’t even realize what they’re doing is wrong and cruel – they just follow orders because they’ve always had a lottery and they can’t imagine life without one. “‘Some places have already quit lotteries.’ Mr. Adams said. ‘Nothing but trouble in that,’ Old Man Warner said stoutly. ‘Pack of young fools’” (Jackson 4). Although other towns are quitting the lotteries because they realize they’re wrong and unjust, this village refuses to stray from tradition. A tradition so inhumane and violent should be abandoned, but unfortunately no one sees it that way until they wi...
Tradition is huge in small towns and families and allows for unity through shared values, stories, and goals from one generation to the next. Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery” carries that theme of tradition. The story follows a small town that performs the tradition of holding an annual lottery in which the winner gets stoned to death. It (tradition) is valued amongst human societies around the world, but the refusal of the villagers in “The Lottery” to let go of a terrifying long-lasting tradition suggests the negative consequences of blindly following these traditions such as violence and hypocrisy.
Throughout my childhood, I was constantly reminded how much I didn’t know about my heritage. I never understood my parents when they spoke in Arabic. They enrolled me in a Sunday school to learn Islamic studies, which turned out to be ineffective. Whenever I spoke on the phone with family overseas, I couldn’t understand a word they said. As a result, eight years ago, my parents flipped my life upside down and inside out by making the biggest decision of our lives: We were moving halfway across the world, all the way to Amman, Jordan. Naturally, this decision was shocking to me, but it was a great many other things as well. I felt excited, yet scared; fascinated, yet furious. Day and night, I constantly thought of this upcoming adventure and, before I knew it, I found myself on a plane ride to Amman. My very own “journey of a lifetime” was finally starting. Little did I know, however, this “journey” would change who I am entirely.
Shakespeare is a writer who seems to so easily capture the true nature of people. Of course, never lacking humor as he portrays these characteristics. What might be harsh reality written by someone else, becomes that everyone can laugh at--even if that reality is about themselves.
In Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery” (Jackson 133), the underlying evil and intention can conceivably be, control, through the use of tradition. What started off as a gruesome practice, evolved into a horrific tradition, and most appalling, is that no one knows the point of the tradition. The lottery’s system wasn’t truly a belief, but rather a institutionalized custom, which through time, doctrine was lost and forgotten, protocols were tossed aside for self-serving reasons; none of which was to aid in the salvation of life. The same can be said about many traditions in our society, though not to go as far to say tradition does not change for the better. In fact, many traditions in our society have changed, from negative to positive, often time concealing the horrific nature behind the tradition and only focusing on the good. Granting all this, there remains a distinctive flaw in tradition. If holding truth to custom translates as something distasteful, perhaps it would be best to allow that custom to die out completely. While Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery” (133), came off as disrespectful to many, one thing remains evident, tradition can be used as a device of sovereignty, by removing protocols, losing doctrine and institutionalizing
Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery" is all about how an old tradition as the lottery exceeds our expectations. First by giving us the readers the believe that the price of the lottery would be something great. Making us questioning the results and why to do this with no explanation at the end. Teaching us how traditions are that don’t make sense are killing because Society is clinging to this traditions and practices.
Often when thinking about tradition we think of Christmas morning or Passover Seder. But, have you ever wondered how much your traditions have changed since when they were started? The message portrayed in Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery” is the dangers of blindly following traditions, and how it affects those participating. The villagers’ in the story give a blind approval of the lottery, which allows a ceremonial murder to become part of their town’s tradition, without purpose of doing it, besides the fact they’ve forever held a lottery to stone someone due to the belief that the crops will come soon. For the villagers, the lottery is a tradition that stems from a superstition, which is a good enough reason and all the justification they need