Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Edna st vincent millay analysis love is not all
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
While love may be an extremely touchy subject as well as one that can be incredibly hard to interpret in a unique way, it is not impossible to broach the subject from a fresh perspective; In “Love is not all” Edna St. Vincent Millay is able to approach love in a way that initially seems extremely pessimistic and almost cold, but continues on to show the reader that she is not actually all that closed and even reveals some vulnerability by the very end. While the more negative approaches she uses would appeal to some people, it seems that if you actually take the time to read it a few times the cynical façade fades away and you can understand Millay’s interpretation of love as guarded but not completely negative.
Millay’s treatment of love in “Love is not all” appears to be as unique as her interesting perspective and way of looking at the subject. While the easiest route may be to read the poem and judge her for being cold and closed of the idea of love it makes more sense to give her the benefit of the doubt and assume that she is wary, but not closed to the idea as we know it. If you take her tone and diction, perhaps not as cynical but as a guarded reaction to love lost, the poem instantly takes on a completely different feeling and becomes more of a commentary on a universal feeling of heartbreak then it is pure cynicism. If you continue to read the poem keeping in mind the idea of her jaded attitude being the result of some sort of past unrequited love you can see that her tone isn’t as distant as it originally seems but is in fact hurt or wounded at best, the statement “I might be driven to sell your love for peace” (Millay, 12) can be seen as a statement from a miffed lover as opposed to one from an anti-love extremist....
... middle of paper ...
...ill the thickened lung with breath” (Millay, 5) this certainly does not seem to be a line that would be found in most love poems. Her treatment of love in this way, paired with the possibility of hope and redemption by the end of the poem makes for an interesting read that adds stimulating change to a usually formulaic genre.
Millay is able to push past the boundaries of love poems and with her words stride confidently towards poetry that is not enslaved by genre, expectations or judgment. In “Love is not all” her treatment of love is unique but still tender enough to appeal to a wide variety of new readers as well as those who enjoy classic love poems, she strikes a careful balance between radical and conventional and her handling of love flourishes because of it.
Works Cited
Millay, Edna St. Vincent
Virtual Campus. University of Ottawa. 10 Feb 2011
I personally loved everything that this poem stood for. I liked that this poem had two average people at its center. They were not young or insanely beautiful, but they still showed how amazing love can be and how love goes beyond everything. When it comes down to it love has no gender, age, race, or time it is just about humans loving other humans. In this week’s chapter it is discussed how romance itself has a huge cultural impact and this poem definitely connects with this idea. This poem also follows the cliche of love. The way that love is blinding and will conquer all is presented in a real and believable way, but then it can also be considered unrelatable for some because how romance is set up to be and how high the standards are for true love. Furthermore, I like the idea of love going beyond age, beauty, and time but realistically for most people they will never experience a love so intense. People can though understand how what is portrayed in the media is not how everyone experiences love and that people who differ from this unrealistic standard can still be in love in their own intense beautiful way.
The Definitive Guide to Love Poems. Web. The Web. The Web. 8 Apr. 2011. The. "Contemporary Literature, Books on Literature."
Both poets want to be loved in the poems in their own way. While both poem’s present a theme of love, it is obvious that the poet’s view on love changes from how they view love at the beginning of the poem from how they see it at the end.
Millay’s sonnet, “What lips my lips have kissed,” grows further involved and meaningful through the use of literary concepts. These profoundly dark and clouded sentiments highlighted in the demeanor of a speaker, the tone, sounds of language, vocabulary, figurative language, and structure used. These literary concepts would not have been as imperative as it is in delivering the speaker’s sentiments to the reader. Any artist who applies color, texture, medium, and space to bring their pieces of art to life in as much a poet must use these kinds of literary
Love has many definitions and can be interpreted in many different ways. William Maxwell demonstrates this in his story “Love”. Maxwell opens up his story with a positive outlook on “Love” by saying, “Miss Vera Brown, she wrote on the blackboard, letter by letter in flawlessly oval palmer method. Our teacher for fifth grade. The name might as well have been graven in stone” (1). By the end of the story, the students “love” for their teachers no longer has a positive meaning, because of a turn in events that leads to a tragic ending. One could claim that throughout the story, Maxwell uses short descriptive sentences with added details that foreshadow the tragic ending.
Love can be false or a lie, but if it is beautiful love, then it is also true. The poet enhances readers understanding of the values beauty and truth by illustrating in his poem how truth can be found through beauty. When the speaker in the poem talks about how he wishes love were like rain, he is exemplifying truth. Typically truth is something that is logical and that can be proven, but in this case truth is not something that is logical. Love is not logical, but it is still true. As stated earlier, truth can be found through beauty. In other words, for something to be undeniably beautiful then it has to be true. Love cannot be proven because it is a feeling and emotion. However, love can be felt, so therefore love is true. Things humans feel are true. It cannot be proven that someone can feel it but if that is what a person senses to be true then it is so. The pragmatic truth test supports these claims that love is true because the speaker of the poem believes his love to be true. In short, love is something that is beautiful and because it is beautiful it is likewise
Some may say love is just an emotion while others may say it is a living and breathing creature. Songs and poems have been written about love for hundreds and thousands of years. Love has been around since the beginning of time, whether someone believes in the Big Bang or Adam and Eve. Without love, there wouldn’t be a world like it is known today. But with love, comes pain with it. Both William Shakespeare and Max Martin know and knew this. Both ingenious poets wrote love songs of pain and suffering as well as blossoming, newfound love. The eccentric ideal is both writers were born centuries apart. How could both know that love and pain work hand in hand when they were born 407 years apart? Love must never change then. Love survives and stays its original self through the hundreds and thousands of years it has been thriving. Though centuries apart, William Shakespeare and Max Martin share the same view on love whether i...
Relationships between two people can have a strong bond and through poetry can have an everlasting life. The relationship can be between a mother and a child, a man and a woman, or of one person reaching out to their love. No matter what kind of relationship there is, the bond between the two people is shown through literary devices to enhance the romantic impression upon the reader. Through Dudley Randall’s “Ballad of Birmingham,” Ben Jonson’s “To Celia,” and William Shakespeare’s “Shall I Compare Thee to a Summer’s Day?” relationships are viewed as a powerful bond, an everlasting love, and even a romantic hymn.
Edna St. Vincent Millay's "What Lips My Lips Have Kissed, and Where and Why" is an effective short poem, which feeds on the dissonance between the ideal of love and its reality, heartbreak. In William Shakespeare's "Let Me Not to The Marriage of True Minds," the effectiveness is weakened by its idealiality and metaphysical stereotype. In contrast to Millay, Shakespeare paints a genuine portrait of what love should be but unfortunately never really is. This factor is what makes his poem difficult to relate to, thus weakening the effect on the reader. These poems were published quite far apart from each other, three-hundred and fourteen years to be exact, which might explain the shift in idealism. Though both circumnavigate the concept of love, the effect left within both writers based on personal affairs dramatically differentiates the personas of both speakers.
While Lord Byron's poem enhances the beauty of love, Keats' does the opposite by showing the detriments of love. In “She Walks in Beauty,” the speaker asides about a beautiful angel with “a heart whose love is innocent” (3, 6). The first two lines in the first stanza portray a defining image:
She created a negative connotation of love and its importance in the beginning of the poem, but gradually transitioned to uncertainty allowing the reader to make his or her own decision on the subject. Is love more important than food or shelter, or health? Millay definitely does not answer this question, but in a sense it was not supposed to be answered. Love is as important as one wants it to be. This prominent idea that love is not a necessity of life, but it somehow manages to provoke such great desire and happiness, that it becomes important is the theme of the poem. It is an engaging and thought provoking poem that allows the reader to also examine him or herself, while Millay promotes a direct theme with
This first struck me, as Brooks would write a poem about love and how it feels to be in love, a fairy tale love. Instead, she writes of what it feels like to be in real love, the good, bad, and ugly. When you are young and you read the words “To be in love”, you interpret it differently. You only see the good, a perfect state of what love is; the “honeymoon” stage. In the poem it states “To be in love / is to touch things with a lighter hand”(1-2) which would support this stage in a relationship. Brooks starts the poem off with these lines to describe a more simple time, a euphoric state in the relationship. This is how everyone thinks when he or she is young. You have no true sense of what love really is or what it truly feels like to be in love. But this isn’t why Brooks put this title on this poem. She wants to explain the purest form and most related, relevant, and honest concept of being in love; so Brooks gives you some bad and ugly. The poem goes on to say “He is not there but / you know you are tasting together”(9-10) this is where things could get ugly. When in love you want your partner around, a lot, primarily during this honeymoon stage, but when they are not there it gets lonely. You have dedicated yourself to this person and they are not around to enjoy life with you. Younger people wouldn’t be able to handle this true love but any adult know that when you
The types of love in a poem can be reflected in many ways. One of
Will's beloved is "more lovely and more temperate (18.2)" than a summer's day; "the tenth Muse (38.9);" "'Fair,' 'kind,' and 'true' (105.9);" the sun that shines "with all triumphant splendor (33.10)." We've heard all this before. This idealization of the loved one is perhaps the most common, traditional feature of love poetry. Taken to its logical conclusion, however, idealized love has some surprising implications.
Love is the ubiquitous force that drives all people in life. If people did not want, give, or receive love, they would never experience life because it is the force that completes a person. People rely on this seemingly absent force although it is ever-present. Elizabeth Barrett Browning is an influential poet who describes the necessity of love in her poems from her book Sonnets from the Portuguese. She writes about love based on her relationship with her husband. Her life is dependent on him, and she expresses this same reliance of love in her poetry. She uses literary devices to strengthen her argument for the necessity of love. The necessity of love is a major theme in Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s “Sonnet 14,” “Sonnet 43,” and “Sonnet 29.”