In September 2014, the new National Curriculum was implemented in the United Kingdom. The chief principal for the change was to raise the standard as internationally the UK was not doing as well as other developed countries in the league tables. The curriculum was devised to develop constructive, innovative and well educated pupils. In terms of English curriculum, the new National Curriculum (DfE, 2013) has changed the framework for English by administering the following changes: • Stronger emphasis
Whether a nation should implement a national curriculum in every school until college has raised questions for decades and led to arguments amongst and between generations. Yet, it has enthralled educators, government officials, and the general public similarly. Adopting a national curriculum for schools across the nation would be advantageous if the goal is to create a uniform education system for all students and provide equal access to educational resources for all students and teaching staff
To begin this report into the new National Curriculum in Physical Education for Key Stage 3 and 4, the terms ‘Physical Education’ and ‘National Curriculum’ need to be defined so that the aims can be set out and understood for this paper. Physical Education, as defined by the most recent online edition of the Oxford Dictionary is “Instruction in physical exercise and games, especially in schools” (Oxford Dictionary 2015). The National Curriculum is set out by the government and is “A set of subjects
A National Curriculum has been of some importance within the Australian Governments for some time. Previous national planned curriculums have been developed and failed a number of times. The Australian Governments with the guidance of the Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians have developed ‘The Australian Curriculum’; A planned national curriculum from Foundation to Year 12 covering a variety of learning areas or subjects catering for Diversity, Differences and the needs
The National Curriculum was first introduced in 1988. During the year of 1988 the Education Reform Act could’ve caused the departure of dance in schools. Fortunately, the dance, physical education (PE) and arts education departments challenged for, and successfully won, a place for dance on the curriculum. Dance currently stands as part of the physical education programme, being one of six activity areas within PE. The position of dance became a statutory entitlement at Key Stages (KS) 1-2, and optional
Introduction In this assignment I will justify the place of the following subjects within the primary national curriculum: Geography, History, Physical Education, Religious Education, Drama and Music. The reason I have chosen these subjects is because I have had an experience of them within my teaching placements and within seminars at university. In addition to this, I will analyse the use of cross-curricular learning in primary education and I will aim to explore the benefits and challenges of
England's national curriculum. However on another level physical education has been the subject of crisis meetings in Australia, on the verge of being wiped out in later secondary school education in England and had numerous reviews. So why is physical education important? The major factor being the increasing rise in obesity, but also children appear to have less knowledge of physical skill, lack fitness and are very inactive is a few reasons why physical education needs remain in the curriculum but also
The National Curriculum influences how pupils are taught in schools. The school curriculum draws from National Curriculum to develop its curriculum to meet individual learning needs of all pupils. “The four main purposes of the British National Curriculum seek: To establish an entitlement, establish standards, promote continuity and coherence, lastly to promote public understanding” Looking at teaching English in key stage 1, speaking and listening, reading and writing go hand in hand. “Most children
could a uniform national curriculum standardize and improve education? Having a uniform national curriculum could be beneficial in many ways. A uniform national curriculum would help student evaluation, student flexibility, and student competitiveness because all children would be on a level playing field before entering college. Implementing a uniform national curriculum can tremendously impact the way students are evaluated in schools. It is obvious that when different curriculums are present, the
of the national curriculum in England is considered to have made a lasting impact on pupils’ achievement (DfE 2012). The introduction of the national curriculum has set higher overall expectations of young people (Barber 2002; Hopkins 2001; Tabberer 1994), have reduced inappropriate repetition of content (Chitty 2004; Evangelou et al 2008), and particularly in science, it has ensured a more balanced coverage of content in the primary phase (Harlen 2008). Policy makers believe that curriculum reform
more stable economic sociality. If the nation were to require the same national curriculum for all students until entering college it could eliminate barriers that would hinder the success of students admission into universities and career paths. Such as standardizing testing, quality of teachers and removal of issues that could hold a student back if they relocated a lot. By requiring all students the same national curriculum until they enter college strengthens the success rate and levels the playing
educational system and discuss in detail the features of this policy. I have chosen to look at, in detail the National Curriculum, which was progressively introduced into the Britain in 1989. I want to get an insight into the way the National Curriculum has changed and the ways in which it now gives pupils an extra advantage at getting the best out of their education. The National Curriculum delivers the information pupils need to know in a balanced and manageable way, but at the same time it is hard
Effectiveness and School Improvement; 10; 86 (1999). 2) S. 7) D. Wyse, H. Torrance; Educational Research; 51; 213 (2009). R. Raman, T.Y.Sua; Paedagogica Historica; 46; 117 (2010). 3) “English Education System”; Royal Geographical Society. 4) Curriculum Standards and Guidance, Department of Education. 5) S. Warren; Race, Ethnicity and Education; 10; 367 (2007). 6) S. Md. Nor; The International Journal of Learning; 16; (2009).
“smarter” than us. To begin with though, one must have an understanding of both systems and a basic knowledge of how they work. The United States federal government virtually has no control over our education system. As result, neither a national curriculum, nor a national education system, has ever been enforced. Instead, according to (Hume. “International students…) each state has its own Department of Education. This department sets guidelines for all Stephens2 the schools in that particular state,
The Teaching of the ICT National Curriculum “With scientific method, we took things apart to see how they work. Now with computers we can put things back together to see how they work, by modelling complex, interrelated processes, even life itself. This is a new age of discovery, and ICT is the gateway” ICT stands for Information and Communication Technology. In our rapidly changing world the subject of ICT allows children to prepare and participate in exploring, analysing, exchanging
important activities and only men become the curriculum.” (Dale Spender 1982) The above quite reflects the findings and attitude of Dale Spender, a female sociologist. She believed that his is the reason why females were underachieving during this time and females were gendered into caring subjects. To remove this gender difference the national curriculum, and programs such as the “Girls into science and technology” was introduced. The national curriculum helped girls under achievement. Today
The National Curriculum seems to pursue the route of a “… shared and authentic ‘national’ body of accepted knowledge and standards.” (Walkup, 2011). This appears to tell us that, with the National Curriculum, we are brought together, and taught the same subjects, and have similar attainment targets; however once difference that can also come out of this, is the level and standards at which it is taught, this is because different teachers will have different ideas as to how it should be taught. The
teaching in a lecture style environment, but also get personal fulfilment from carrying out independent research, and adding my views to assignments that are set. I have recently enjoyed analysing the relative success and criticisms of the national curriculum in Sociology, which included analysing evidence from theorists such as Denis Lawton. I have also gained considerable satisfaction from studying the whole of my Business course, and on a daily basis research different mediums in order to obtain
The Impact of Music on the Mind, Body and Spirit Music is fun. The very mention of the word seems to stir emotions that are exciting and interesting. The mind shifts to recall memories that have long passed, moments that could presently be experienced, or future events that will hold a place in one's heart and mind. In everything, there is sound. Where there is sound, there can be music. Where there is music, activities are taking place with implications affecting one's path in life. In an elementary
The national curriculum is made up of reading, writing, and arithmetic. Emphasis must be placed on language and communication for education to be able to reach its growth potential. Writing is used significantly in our culture to communicate with one another. Students use writing everyday as a tool to show comprehension and communicate their thoughts. Although writing is a time consuming activity the education system needs to place more emphasis on writing. In 2003, the National Commission for Writing