“Home is where the heart is,” an old proverb affirms. But this did not always ring true in the life of Gogol Ganguli. In The Namesake, by Jhumpa Lahiri, Gogol was the son of Bengali immigrants who resided in the Northeastern United States. Gogol, many times, struggled with his identity, and one of the major parts of identity is the place one lives. Throughout Gogol’s life, he lived in several different houses and places, and felt differently about each one, fitting into some and feeling strange
In The Namesake, Gogol was always unsure of his identity he did not know how to communicate his feelings with others or how to express himself. He was nothing like his sister Sonia or his enemy Dimitri. He was quiet and lonesome. Sonia and Gogol are complete opposites when it comes to their character types. Sonia is more outgoing, whereas, Gogol is the shy oddball. According to the book, The Namesake, “Sonia plays with the dirt they've dug up from the yard and threatened to put the dollar bill in
different generations show the quest Ashima and Gogol went onto finding their identity, in America. In the novel, The Namesake written by Jhumpa Lahiri shows the interactions between generations and how they affect each other. Ashima spent her whole life as a child surrounded by her family, by sleeping in the same room as her parents, then sharing the same bed with Ashoke. First as her parents’ daughter, and then as Ashoke’s wife, and later as Gogol and Sonia’s mother. She had
identity. Since Gogol constantly struggles with his identity as a blend of both Bengali and American cultures, he also struggles to determine his home. It seems that he never truly feels at home, despite the great diversity among the places in which he lives. In The Namesake, Jhumpa Lahiri shows that one’s home and one’s identity are interconnected; consequently, Gogol’s struggles throughout the novel to determine his identity parallel his difficulty defining a home. One home in which Gogol lives is that
It is not necessary for these types of women to argue that marriage in itself is a social good; equality is the social good towards which they are working. Having access to it has not prevented heterosexuals from challenging traditional marriage; there is no reason to think that it will have this effect on lesbians and gay men. Lesbian feminists will continue to support a radical and democratic vision of family values that will include legal options to support chosen gender and sexual relational
Social class plays an important and vital role in a person’s life to an extent where a world without social class can’t be imagined. Similarly, social class plays a key factor in the lives of the people in the short story “The Nose” by Nikolai Gogol. The author, Gogol, addresses issues of social class in a society in his short story. Another story, which I read long back in school which focused and criticized social class is “Gulliver's Travels” by Jonathan Swift. Both authors attack on the basis of social
The Overcoat by Nikolai Vasilievich Gogol The hero of “The Overcoat”, Akaky Akakievich, engenders both hatred and pity from the reader. His meekness and his pathetic life deserve sympathy, while his utter detachment from his peers and his singular obsession with a coat are often despised. He is drastically different from any of his peers, but there is a certain purity in his way of life which the overcoat defiles. Akaky’s world is completely devoid of any excitement; his sole source of pleasure
demeanor. 19th century Nikolai Vasilievich Gogol was undoubtedly no different. Considered Gogol’s greatest work, Dead Souls is both an exemplar of intellectual Russian critique and side-splitting comedy gold, making it a satire worth crowning its author as one of the greatest writers of his time. Through the protagonist, Pavel Invanovitch Tchitchikov, and his encounters with the many different Russian nobles, women, and serfs that appear throughout the novel, Gogol depicts the flaws and faults of post-Napoleonic
the origin to his first name to the unforeseen consequences in his past romantic relationships, Gogol Ganguli’s identity is formed over the course of the novel, The Namesake. Gogol’s name derives from his father’s near death experience in a train accident and how his parents legally named him with his pet name, a name that alienates him from the rest of his American environment. Aside from his name, Gogol is unable to connect his love life with his Bengali culture; he often finds himself being separated
survive in a cruel world. However, in looking further into the story, deep symbolism can be found. Gogol lived in Russia during the rise of the communist party, and was a great dissident of communism. He believed the inevitable end of a communist government was total failure. He also criticized the other government of the world for failing to aid Russia in its quest for a better system. Gogol used his creative mind and his writing abilities to speak out against the evils of the Russian government
suitably in the case of Lahiri’s Gogol in search of his identity in between his Bengali past and American present. The novel, however, ends in Gogol’s coping with his pangs to live a new life in. The dynamics of relationships continue to puzzle Lahiri as the characters in their multiplicity of relationships, be it from the west or the east, remain universally the same. However, culture remains central concerns in the daunting novel as she interprets various maladies that Gogol suffered and the way he seeks
Igor Stravinsky and Alban Berg, then in the avant-garde, was played. Bela Bartok and Paul Hindemith visited Russia to perform their own works, and Shostakovich toyed openly with these novelties. His first opera, The Nose, based on the satiric Nikolay Gogol story, displayed a thorough understanding of what was popular in Western music combined with his "dry" humor. Not surprisingly, Shostakovich's undoubtedly finer second opera, Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District (later renamed Katerina Izmaylova),
But beginning with this book in 1862, the Jew and the Jewish question assume a place of growing importance in Dostoevsky's thought. The eight years of military and penal servitude in Siberia expose Dostoevsky to both criminals and Jews alike. Unlike Gogol, who in his native Ukraine had observed firsthand the hostility between the Ukrainians and Jews, Dostoevsky did not have any direct experience with Jews, because there were few Jews living in St. Petersburg.4 It is in the House of the Dead that
magical realism was coined by German art critic Franz Roh in 1925 and is commonly-held as a literary movement championed and mastered by Latin American authors (Marquez, Llosa, Fuentes), resonating internationally with the earlier experiments of Gogol, James, Kafka, Flaubert and the Weimar Republic, and now recycled as a counter-hegemonic global commodity in postcolonial contexts (Rushdie, Okri). What defines this writing, then, and how does it function? Why does Yamashita use this form to tell
Dead Souls, remains faithful to the Gogolian tradition in terms of absurdity, lavish detail, and abundant digressions. Although these three literary techniques coexist, interact, and augment each other-the focus of this analysis is to examine how Gogol (or the narrator) deviates from the plotline, the significance of it, and what aesthetic purpose comes from the digression. Although Gogol's marriage to elaboration is at times strenuous-in fact, it is the underlying reason why impatient readers
Point-by-Point Comparison Essay No one really understands how hard it is to live in America and have a different native culture, like Gogol and Richard did. With having a different native culture, many different customs come along with it. Not only are there different customs, but language can differ greatly as well. Learning a new language can be very difficult, especially when you have grown up only knowing the one native language that you have. Adapting to new cultures and languages can be hard
Dead Souls Book Study Dead Souls Is a classic novel by Nikolai Gogol, and is considered an exemplar of 19th century Russian literature. Russian literature in the 19th century provided insight on the flaws and faults of the Russian people during that time, and Gogol masterfully portrayed these defects though his characters. The story focuses on the historical setting, being written after the french invasion of Russia and the thoughts of the war still fresh in the minds of the citizens. also this
Symbolism- a literary device used frequently to contribute to the complexity of a work. In “The Overcoat”, by Nikolay Gogol, uses symbolism throughout this entire work. He uses the old dressing gown to represent his old life, and the new overcoat to represent his new life. The symbols affect the plot and the characters. The old dressing gown represents his old life. It is plain as is Akaky Akakievich. He never does anything even halfway exciting. Most of the time he sits around copying things to
Lahiri uses the psychoanalytical lens to show the reader that a western culture society, can challenge an Asian individual’s cultural identity in a negative manner. This is shown through Ashima, and Gogol, the conflicts between Gogol and society, and the technique of foreshadowing and flashback. Firstly, Gogol and Ashima start to confront society as Ashima starts to avoid growing accustomed to the new world, she has “the oldest address book. Bought twenty-eight years ago […]” (Lahiri, 159). This shows
very different lifestyles. As the years pass, their firstborn, Gogol, displays a strong disapproval of his identity and especially his name, instead embracing the American culture. As he searches for liberty, many complications arise in the form of family and love life, leaving him with deep regrets and disturbing experiences. However, in the loneliness and quiet that surrounds him, Gogol is at last