Assault weapon control is becoming an unavoidable topic in the United States. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation more than nine hundred people have died from mass shootings in the past seven years and an assault rifle was used in twelve of the forty-three mass shootings in the past four years. The U.S. Department of Defense has long defined assault rifles as fully automatic rifles used for military purposes. The National Firearm Act of 1934 prohibited fully automatic weapons in the
Introduction: What is considered an Assault Weapon There are many views about gun control especially when referring to assault weapons. People are both for it and against it. When first hearing “Assault Weapon Man”, many different images filter through one’s mind on what an assault weapon looks like and how to differentiate between an assault weapon and a regular handgun. There is still no consistent definition for an assault weapon. The only definitions that are out there are the ones found in laws
in the number of weapons; specifically assault rifles. This leads one to question do we need to ban the right to possess such weapons? If the possession of these weapons is not made illegal, we run the risk of another attack. While there is no questioning the severity of these mass shootings, a ban on assault rifles is not the answer because they are not the cause of such events, and it is a constitutional right to own them. In 1994, Congress passed the Federal Assault Weapons Ban which eliminated
Does Obama Really Want to Take Our Guns? Our country has always believed in a citizens right to own a gun. It is a principle that is so important to our country, that it is listed as the second of twenty-seven constitutional amendments. Gun control is a subject of great controversy that carries many true and false claims. Many people believe our second amendment rights are being attacked, and that the government wants to take our guns away. It is my belief that Obama does not want to take our
controversial amendment. The battle will rage on between to two groups that support and oppose, and presidents who are for and against this will constantly be changing what the law has to say in regards to it. Based on history, most likely a complete ban on certain types of guns and the ability to carry those permitted will not be easy.
the potential for terrible things. A gun can be smuggled across state boarders and if it is illegal in one state, it is easy to go to another to purchase it. Background checks should be required no matter where you by a gun, even at gun shows. All weapons must be registered in the United States, because as of now, there are no laws preventing anyone from going to another country and bringing firearms back. In addition, it should be illegal to have a gun in a public place, because schools are not the
are others who use them for crimes, as well as for other situations. Firearm deaths in the United States have slowly been decreasing from year to year with all these bills getting passed to promote a safer country than ever before. Guns are the main weapon for youth suicide, school shootings, and for committing murder. In 2010 there were 2,711 infants, child, and teenage firearm deaths. As in school shootings and in committing murder, studies show shooters often had multiple, non-automatic guns, shootings
The NRA argues that the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees individuals the right to own and carry guns. They are concerned that federal regulations will continue to increase until owning a handgun will be difficult to achieve, infringing on their Constitutional rights. They also argue that if law-abiding citizens have guns, they are safer from criminals, bringing crime rates down. Con 1 Freedom has a price. For free speech the price is political dissent like flag burning
that soon might be ripped from the market. Time and time again, this same series of events occurs. Questions about how to fix this likely weigh heavily on people 's minds but, there seems to be no solution. Some argue that registration of firearms, bans of certain firearms, and background checks can curb the violence. However, none of these things seem to fix the issue. That is simply because these “solutions” don’t work. In the wake of recent and past
One of the most controversial topics of the year is the argument on guns and the government attempting to ban and control certain guns. This topic has always been in disagreement among the American public but has recently become much more popular after several large-scale shootings such as the infamous Sandy Hook. Despite gun control appearing to be the solution to these tragic events, controlling and banning guns will simply not work. Why will it not work and why is it so bad? Because it has not
“The united states has the highest rate of firearms death” (Stronger gun control will save lives). Yeah, America might have that, but think of it this way, if a law-abiding citizen who had a legal weapon and a pistol permit then that number would go way down. Other people say if guns really kept us safe the united states would be the safest nation. Yes, I do believe that, but we have too many crazy people who don 't care about others. That 's what
supporting the bans, simply due to what people have seen with the mentally ill in the media today, these are often the indviduals who support restrictions that have been made on the purchasing of firearms. Others highly oppose gun control, standing firm by the belief that any form of suppression towards firearm ownership, is a clear violation of anyone 's constitutional rights. "In 1990, the Violence Policy Center announced that the debate must be switched from small handguns to large “assault rifles.”
Should the Government Ban Assault Weapons? Over the last decade or so, the United States of America has been shaken by an epidemic of terrifying mass shootings, devastating slayings of unexpecting victims, and unnerving annihilations of the innocent. There is no specific target, no explicitly sought-out group, nor definite individual. From a classroom of first-graders, to a crowded movie theatre, to a U.S. Naval yard, the location seems at most, random, other than that it is almost always a public
Banning Assault Weapons: Protecting the American People or Infringing upon Their Rights?? 1966, Charles Joseph Whitman climbed to the top of the iconic clock tower in the center of Texas University in Austin and killed sixteen and seriously injured thirty of his fellow Texas Longhorns. 1991, George Hennard, thirty-five, opened fire on forty innocent patrons at a Luby’s in Killeen, Texas, killing twenty-three of his intended targets. 1999, citizens in a small Colorado County of Douglas were distraught
Amendment, but not war weapons on streets”, quoted President Barack Obama ("Barack Obama on Gun Control", n.d., para. 3). The debate on whether stricter gun laws will help deter crime has gained much attention since crime rates started to increase. Many research studies show that stricter gun laws are very effective at inhibiting crime. Arguing on the affirmative side, stricter gun laws will help deter crime by banning ownership of military-style assault weapons, by banning weapons with high-capacity
The Dangers of the Assault Weapons In today’s society, it is not difficult to get access to assault weapons. In California, as well as many other states in America, obtaining a gun license is very easy: any twenty-one-year-old and above legal resident can apply for a gun license. The requirements of the gun license are: pass the written gun safety test, pass the federal background check, pay a small fee and present a valid ID. If the applicant fulfills all the requirements, then he or she can legally
Should the government restrict access to assault weapons? This question has gotten many Americans thinking and has the nation divided. The Assault Weapons Ban of 1994 banned large capacity magazines and assault weapons. Then in 2004 the ban was lifted and never renewed. Now Americans are wondering if it should be renewed after many mass shootings like in Newtown, Connecticut. Also, gun supporters argue that it would Infringe on the Second Amendment. Then, should Large capacity magazines be banned
The word assault means to make a physical attack on someone, but how does a weapon with the purpose to provide food for your family become classified as an assault weapon? If a weapon is used to assault another person is it then classified as an assault weapon, or is it still just a weapon used to bring harm to someone? The classification of an assault gun should be changed. Most assault weapons that are in America aren’t used for assault, but they are used to provide food for a family or protection
amendment; Second, I will talk about gun violence. While "the NRA (National Rifle Association) believes that every law-abiding citizen is entitled to the ownership and legal use of firearms", I will argue that the production, sale, and possession of assault weapons for private citizens should be banned in the U.S. The recent shootings at Las Vegas and Parkland school in Florida have indicated the urgent needs for stricter regulations that will make it more difficult for citizens to possess a
certain groups such as the NRA advocating no gun control at all, putting these weapons on pedestals, as the ultimate forms of freedom, liberty and expression, surpassing even the freedoms of speech, religion and petition. It will prove difficult to find a suitable middle ground to satisfy gun worshiping conservatives who are terrified of losing their guns, to big city liberals who see no need for people owning assault weapons because they are black and scary looking. However we can all agree on one thing