General George S. Patton once said, “The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.” This man obviously had the destruction of other people on his mind at the time. War includes much destruction in different ways. Along with the destruction of people is the destruction of items. All wars take place somewhere and always destroy the surrounding buildings and possessions. Self destruction is also a main part of war due to killing other people. War causes three different types of destruction: destruction of people, destruction of items, and self destruction.
Destruction of people can be named murder, genocide, or if you are really screwed up, fun. Murder can be grouped into any killing or just killing people outside of war and battle. Some people think that killing people in war is not murder because the government does not persecute them for it but give them paychecks, promotions, and awards. Webster’s definition of genocide is: the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group. Adolf Hitler is p...
Lawyer: the word genocide, is the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular nation or ethnic group.
In the novel, My Brother Sam is Dead, by James and Christopher Collier, they teach that there are many other ways to solve conflict besides war. War is violent, disgusting, and gruesome and so many people die in war. Families separate in war because of how many people want to be in the thrill of the war and also how many innocent family members die in the midst of war. Lastly, war is worthless and it was caused by a disagreement over something little and the outcome of war is not worth the many lives, time, and money and there are other ways to solve conflict besides to fight. War causes so many negative outcomes on this world that it needs to be avoided at all costs.
there are different reason that lead to war. the war could be between different countries such as world war I, World War II, and Vietnam war. Also, the war could happen within one country such as the Civil War; however, the results of these different wars are all almost the same; the war effects the people of the countries on war and the soldiers who fight for these wars. however, many people wonder if these effects disappear by the end of the war or if there are other effect on these people after the end of the war. many people believe that the war has impact the lives of the soldiers who were at this war and their lives are no longer the same as the one before they were soldiers fighting for their countries.
A genocide can be classified as the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a specific ethnic race or or group. All genocides start with certain beliefs. These beliefs grows as they spread to large groups of people. If taken too far these beliefs can negatively impact the lives of many as well as all the future generations to come. When one thinks of genocide they usually only think of the suffering inflicted on the different ethnic groups as well as the devastating losses that ensue. Most do not consider the effects of genocide on countries and people after it happens. Genocide not only impacts the group of people who are persecuted but also the generations of people who come later. The Cambodian Genocide was one
The United States would not be the way it is now if it wasn’t for the Civil War . The Civil War was and is going to be one of the most bloody war that had a huge impact to our country. The purpose of this war was to figure out if our nation, with a declaration that states all men are created with equal rights to liberty , can still endure the slave-holding country, the United States. This war lasted for about 4 years, 1861-1865; although, the battle lasted for three days and resulted in over 620,00 deaths and over a million injuries. When the public elected Abraham Lincoln as president in 1860 , he wanted to end slavery in territories where there was slavery. However, the Southern states did not comply with these demands so they withstood this. Furthermore , the Confederate, Northern states , and the Union , Southern states , wounded up fighting , killing , and injuring each other.
With the millions of murders that occurred during the time of the Holocaust, there would have to be a name for this heinous crime. The Nazis were always remembered for the killing of over six million European Jews, but at the time, there was no name for this wicked act. After the war, many of these Nazi war criminals were convicted of an act called genocide, a word that did not exist before 1944. Genocide is the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group. Genocide occurs because of many factors that trigger this cruelty. Although there are many reasons that can be considered to result in genocide, the three main reasons that result to this mass slaughter, are caused by the authority that leads
“Dulce Et Decorum Est” is a very powerful poem that is drawn from the author Wilfred Owen’s own experiences. This poem has great imagery and uses many metaphors which make the reader put themselves in Owen’s eyes. The pain is felt in his voice as he talks about his friend that he sees dying, yet he can do nothing about. His poem has an ironic point about how if people would put themselves in his spot at that moment they would not be telling their children that war was good. While in “Dead Troops Talk”, which is a photograph done by Jeff Wall, there seems to be a different feeling about it. It is not as heavy as the poem. For in the photograph the soldiers, who appear to have been killed in action, have been re-animated to be talking and goofing around. The poem and the work of art are similar in the fact that they are both about war. However, the feeling that one gets from each of them is different. The death in the poem is a very tragic and demoralizing but in the photograph the soldiers who have been killed seem to be happy now that they no longer serving in someone else’s war.
The analysis of this empowering term is fairly self-explanatory when the time is taken to break it down. Linda Jacobs Altman author of Genocide The Systematic Killing of a People claims that in 1944 the Greek word genos, meaning “race” or “tribe” and the Latin cide, which means “killing” were combined to result in the title of genocide. Altman states that today’s definition recognizes genocide as “Acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group, as such”. A similar description has genocide as “A form of one-sided mass killing in which a state or other authority intends to destroy a group, as that group and membership in it are defined by the perpetrator”(Altman). Due to genocide being a worldwide issue, definitions have been known to cause controversy. Countries that represent perpetrators of past genocides often argue, on ridiculous terms, that their actions did not constitute a formal genocide. The breakdown of the word is helpful in the decision making process when determining if acts truly are those of genocide.
2) - . Others have used the term to mean the deliberate destruction of physical group that share the main characteristic of belonging to a political - this movement definition has been used because of the systematic destruction of these groups are not covered , such as genocide under the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of genocide ( CPPCG ) . CPPCG only covers physical deliberate destruction of national , ethnic , racial and religious groups.
The term "Holocaust," originally from the Greek word "holokauston" which means "sacrifice by fire," refers to the Nazi's persecution and planned slaughter of the Jewish people. Beginning on April 6, 1994, Hutus began slaughtering the Tutsis in the African country of Rwanda. Genocide is the systematic destruction of all or part of a racial, ethnic, religious or national group. There have been many different other examples of genocide in history. Although there are many common characteristics and themes that occur with all genocides, the Holocaust and Rwanda were different due to aggressors, reasons, and outcomes.
War is pointless and destructive, and violence causes hatred and fear. The American Revolution was a brutal war in 1775. In battle and in imprisonment, thousands of people had lost their lives. Forced into poverty and violence, colonists in the New World were struggling with getting food, earning money, and finding supplies. In My Brother Sam is Dead, the authors James Lincoln Collier and Christopher Collier show the good and bad parts of war, but they mostly say that war is futile.
First, war is universal due to its violent nature, violence in its application knows no bounds, and it is the common factor that identifies the war and without it the war is nothing more than a diplomatic effort to reach the end. However, wars blow out only when the diplomacy fails. Violence is the war engine. Although the application of violence evolved through time and its severity varies according to communities, cultures, and the means and methods used. Demonstrating the violence through the application of force to subjugate the enemy is the central idea of war. “War is a clash between major interests,
The three sources being analyzed are Stephen Crane's poem “War is Kind”, Stanley Kubrick's film Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, and Joseph Heller's novel Catch- 22. Each source covers a chapter in American War history: The Civil War, The Cold War, and World War II, respectively. Though the wars on which the works are based occurred over a period of over one-hundred years, all three sources share a similar theme. That is, war is anything but heroic and noble, but rather, it is a convoluted, tragic, and crooked state of affairs that results in the death of many. Though this theme unifies all three works, the authors and director convey their messages uniquely. In his heartfelt and tragic poem, “War is Kind”, Stephen Crane writes about the sadness that comes with the death of individual soldiers during battle, and uses sarcasm to convey his message. On the other hand, Heller and Kubrick deliver an equally powerful message about the absurdities of war through use of dark humour and satire, though Kubrick's film focuses much more on comedic value as opposed to Heller's more bitter and realistic novel.
The era of old wars has been succeeded by a new kind of war consisting of the new wars. Basically, the phenomena of new wars is one that is described by civil or international wars that engage in low grade conflicts entailing innumerable transnational and multinational connections such that differences between local and global relationships, internal and external, and violence and oppression emanating from the war are intricate to sustain (Clausewitz, 2007, p. 13). In principle, new wars are synonymous to conventional warfare in which the contemporary conventional military armament and combat tactics are no longer utilized in open confrontation between interstate conflicts (Duffield, 2005, p. 25).
Many poems have been written about warfare, some romantic and others imbedded with the realities of war. In this paper I would like to compare two such poems and hopefully show the reader that the glories of war fall short of its realities. We will be looking at "The Charge of the Light Brigade" by Alfred Lord Tennyson and "Dulce Et Decorum Est" by Wilfred Owen.