Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
evolution taught in school
evolution taught in school
religious practices affect education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: evolution taught in school
Did you know that a staggering 46% of Americans believe that creationism is the one and only explanation for human existence? (Gallup) Interestingly, 100% of them are correct. While 46% may not seem large at first, the theory that is being taught to children in school instead is believed by only 15% of the American population. These statistics that were discovered by a recent Gallup poll show that a vast majority of Americans do not approve of what their precious children are being taught in school. Using the Holy Bible and my vast knowledge of religious culture, I will make it clear to all the non-believers that creationism is the way to go and should be taught to the youth of America.
Creationism is an idea that defines the way that we as a human race ended up at where we are today. In short, God created the world as it is written in the Bible. While there may be other ideas out there, such as evolution, all of them are wrong. The only one that is right is the one in The Bible, as it is God’s word on paper. To deny God’s word on paper would be to deny God himself. When I reference “the Bible”, I mean the holy text of God that everyone is to abide by. Not some fairy tale written by men in the desert thousands of years ago that knew they could control the masses while they were weak and vulnerable.
Some people believe that other causes are the reason for our existence here. Sadly, these cockamamie tales are the ones taught to our children in school. What’s even worse is that they directly contradict the Holy Bible! The most common is the idea that humans “evolved” from monkeys. (Nye, “Evolution v. Creationism Debate”) This is crazy, at best. Have you ever seen a monkey transform into a person? I suggest you try it sometime. Go ...
... middle of paper ...
...hat it’s okay for women to abort babies? That nothing is wrong with homosexuals getting married? (Simon Ellis, “How to Extinguish the Flames of the Flaming”) Where does the horror stop?
Works Cited
"Jesus, New Math, and The 21st Century." Jesus, New Math, and The 21st Century. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Mar. 2014. .
"In U.S., 46% Hold Creationist View of Human Origins." In U.S., 46% Hold Creationist View of Human Origins. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Mar. 2014. .
What Percentage of Prisoners are Atheists? It’s a Lot Smaller Than We Ever Imagined." Friendly Atheist. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Mar. 2014. .
Many people believe that we originated from apes and monkey. We can now possibly learn many things from studying and observing chimpanzees and monkeys.
Evolution and creationism: two warring beliefs that are constantly looking for an upper hand. With similarities and comparisons that Christianity does not deny, yet evolution quickly repudiates. Where do you stand? In a belief that has so many loose threads, like a puppet that has too many strings, you try to apply it, but the strings become tangled and unusable? Or in a belief that does have proof and undeniable evidence, one that has a promise of everlasting life as apposed to a dark nothingness? A decision must be reached. Whether through further evidence outside this paper, or just through your day to day life, your must know where your beliefs lie. Just know, that if what Christians say is true, and the evidence is overlooked and criticized, you will face something much, much worse than being castigated by those around you.
We humans have always thought of ourselves as being unique, whether by divine sanction or by a self-established belief in superiority. For some, this understanding is intimately tied to the traditional tenets that have long been held as fact, having only recently been challenged. For modern Christians, the literal interpretation of the Bible=s account of creation has come under attack by the development and widespread acceptance of Darwinian evolution. To some, undermining the credibility of Biblical creation directly calls into question the Bible=s authority on its moral teachings. As Ken Ham, from the WGBH Boston Video Evolution Series: What About God? states, AYwhat it [the Bible] says is what it meansYit relates to the authority of scripture and the gospelsYso, if the Bible got it wrong in astronomyYgeologyYbiologyYthen why should I trust the Bible when it talks about morality and salvation? [i]@ It is no wonder with sentiments like these that the backlash against evolution has been so strong and lasting; nonetheless, it has not been until the last few decades that such a debate has moved from the pulpit to the laboratory. With a more educated and well-informed army of Christians, who believe in creationism, the scientific evidence for evolution has now come under assault. With creationists and intelligent design advocates like Henry M. Morris and Michael J. Behe respectively, the attack on Darwin is no longer argued as religion versus evolution per se, but rather one Alegitimate@ scientific theory against another.
substantiates the evidence against the existence of God. This creationism counter-argument known as evolution has its roots in our contemporary understanding of a progressive process of natural evolution. This process shaped the nature of all living things beginning with single-cell organisms and ending with highly complex creatures such as humanoids.
One way to address the question is whether or not creationism, in itself, is a valid idea to be taught in public schools. The answer to this can be yes. Not only should a student in American public schools learn and acquire knowledge in empirical sciences, and other tangible facts both in history and other courses, but he should also learn how to think and make decisions for himself. Unfortunately, as it turns out, creationism is in direct conflict with the biological theory of evolution. Many fundamentalist propose that creationism should replace, or at least be offered as an alternative to Darwin’s theory of evolution.
Many people have asked the question, where did we come from? According to creationists a higher power, or “God” created the universe. Some believe that “God” started off the universe and let it form by itself. Others think that “God” has been in creation since the beginning. However evolution is a completely different way of thinking, and is very complex. Evolution is the study of the gene change in a population from one generation to another, and is the decent of different spices through time. However there are always on going arguments about how the universe was created and how humans came into existence. I will try and explain the pros and cons of the theories of creation and evolution
Conflict between science and religion has been around way before Charles Darwin’s published book, Origin of the Species, came to be (“The Evolution, Creationism, and Intelligent Design Controversy”). Which is a book that is considered to be the foundation of evolutionary biology, featuring the idea of ‘natural selection.’ Some people believe that we as humans have evolved as the most intelligent and advanced species on the planet, while others think we have been placed here and designed for a reason. Many debates and court cases have come to be because of these two ideas of science versus religion. Although there are many debates between the two, the ideas overturn when the parties overlook the distinction between that which cannot be proven (faith), compared with that which has not been proven (theory) (Lipman, Robert M.). Theories, including evolution, can and should be investigated with appropriate scientific diligence (Lipman, Robert M.).
... 1959; Nagel, 1971). Some are able to bear the burden of absurdity. Others still feel “that nostalgia for unity, that appetite for the absolute illustrates the essential impulse of the human drama” (Camus, 1955). If scientific discovery can be used as a barometer for the zeitgeist of any particular moment, then the struggle between science and creationism is an indicator of a shifting paradigm. Science is alienating those who need a greater purpose and meaning in life. The threat is a personal one. To teach creationism is not only an infringement on religious freedom, it is also the promotion of intolerance and an advocacy for being afraid of existence. Religion is always there for those who need it. Science is there for those dedicated to truth and knowledge and are comfortable with facing the painful, anxiety-producing endeavor of exploring the unknown.
The ongoing scientific investigation of how exactly evolution occurred and continues to occur has been an argumentative idea amongst society since Darwin first articulated it over a century ago. The scientific basis of evolution accounts for happenings that are also essential concerns of religion; both religion and science focus on the origins of humans and of biological diversity. For instance, in the reading “Truth Cannot Contradict Truth,” Pope John Paul II, addressing the Pontifical Academy of Science, discussed the matter of God as creator of man. The Pope explains that men cannot relate to animals because men are superior. The reasoning for that is because God created humans under his likeness. What the church is saying about mankind contradicts with the scientific evidence scientists have found on human evolution. By analyzing the different scientific approaches, one will be able to grasp a clear understanding that the theory of evolution by natural selection conflicts with the Judeo-Christian worldview of God as creator.
Creationism is defined as “the belief that the universe and the various forms of life were created by God out of nothing” (Britannica 1). With the
The Bible has been at the center of many highly controversially issues over the last 2000 years. Believers and non-believers alike have been debating whether it is the true word of God, or just a collection of stories and myths. At the forefront of this debate is the issue of creation. Many Christians believe that God created the world in 7 literal, 24-hour days. Using this theory, they would say the earth is roughly 6000 years old, but there is also a minority who believe in an old earth and that the creation story in Genesis 1 should be taken figuratively. Those who believe that the creation story is written in figurative language hold a variety of different beliefs on the issue, but at the center of their argument is the statement that: “Genesis 1 should not be taken literally, and that there is no way the earth is only 6000 years old”. In order to understand both sides, the true meaning of the Biblical text must be understood.
Creationist science is a branch of Creationism, which believes that the world was created and designed by the biblical God of Genesis. They believe that “the days of Genesis ought to be taken literally as seven 24 hour days, and that the theory of evolution by natural selection, and the big bang theory, are [fundamentally] incompatible with the story of creation” (277). In Creationist science, Creationism is seen as a scientific theory and, biblical scripture is used as textual proof for their claims. One of its many flaws is how it fails to account for the tremendous breadth and depth of phenomena that the evolution theory has been unable to adequately explain. It is an extremely fragile theoretical apparatus when compared to evolution.
When the modern person ponders the formation of human beings, our mind automatically goes to Adam and Eve, whom were the first man and woman created by God according to the Book of Genesis. Before there was Adam and Eve, diverse cultures came up with myths about the construction of humans. These myths included: “The Song of Creation” from the Rig Veda, An African Creation Tale, From the Popol Vuh, and A Native American Creation Tale “How Man Was Created” Each one of these legends gives a diverse perspective on the creation of human beings.
Mankind’s origin was not a result a ridiculous theory that a big bang occurred, causing life to begin. Neither was mankind a single cell organism floating around in the ocean. Mankind was not formed by a mutation of organisms in the sea. Man’s origin did not come from another life source from another planet.
Based on scientific beliefs, one is to think we come from a less intelligent species through evolution. There is also the often believed but sadly never proven fact that we could have possibly derived from a higher power that designed our every millimeter. Also possible we started as a single celled organism by a higher power, but not monitored throughout growth into what we are now. Whichever the...