Abortion is inherently immoral because life begins at conception and therefore abortion is murder and infringes on ones unalienable rights to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness stated in the Declaration of Independence. Abortion also takes a physical and emotional toll on both the fetus and mother and therefore the sanctity of life must be protected. Although pro-life advocates argue the moral side of abortion— the killing of the innocent is immoral, pro-choice advocates argue the legal standpoint—the illegalization of abortion is a breach of privacy and therefore is unconstitutional.
In each debate one must recognize there are never two distinct sides however, for abortion two sides tend to be more common: pro-life advocates argue the issue is very black and white; do you support life or the killing of the helpless. While pro-choice proponents see the issue as part of natural human rights, each woman should have the ability to choose to do what they want with the pregnancy.
The battle between legality and morality has been actively debated and has found precedence in the Supreme Court. The legality behind abortion differs from state to state, but universal law was enacted in 1973, when the Supreme Court case, Roe v. Wade gained strong recognition. Roe, a single pregnant mother living in Dallas, Texas was on the hunt for a legal abortion, stating it would be given from a certified physician. However, her attempts were hindered because at the time Texas law stated—the mother’s life must be at risk during pregnancy in order to legally terminate the fetus. (Case Law) Roe disputed the issue declaring that her constitutional rights were violated. “She claimed that the Texas statutes were unconstitutionally vague and that they...
... middle of paper ...
... Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
NA. "Roe v. Wade 1973." Phschool. Phschool, n.d. Web. 06 Dec. 2013.
NA. "State Facts About Abortion: Oregon." State Facts About Abortion: Oregon.
Guttmacher Institute, n.d. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
Rossi, Marco Rosaire. "Nonreligious and pro-life: the new normal or same old, same old?" The Humanist Sept.-Oct. 2012: 32+. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 3 Dec. 2013.
Roe v. Wade. 410 U.S 113. Supreme Court of the United States. 1973. FindLaw. Web. 6 December 2013.
Smith, Nick. "Both Sides Have Highs, Lows in Abortion Battle." Bismarck Tribune. Bismarck Tribune, 08 Dec. 2013. Web. 09 Dec. 2013.
Street Law. "Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court." Background Summary & Questions (•). Street Law Inc, n.d. Web. 08 Dec. 2013.
Terzo, Sarah. "LifeNews.com." LifeNews.com. Life News, 2 July 2013. Web. 08 Dec. 2013.
US const. amend. XIV. Section. I.
Hall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Abortion is a very controversial and sensitive topic in today’s society. Two different sides to this argument is pro-life and pro-choice. Pro-life proponents believe in the right to life for unborn fetuses saying that abortion should be considered murder regardless of how far along in the pregnancy the woman is. Pro-choice advocates people who believe the woman carrying the fetus should be able to make her own decision on aborting the fetus.
Remy, Richard C., Gary E. Clayton, and John J. Patrick. "Supreme Court Cases." Civics Today. Columbus, Ohio: Glencoe, 2008. 796. Print.
"Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court." Background Summary & Questions (•••). N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Dec. 2013.
Wade was “the fetal right to life against a woman’s right to privacy,” and which right gets priority (“Roe v. Wade.” Roe v. Wade). An unmarried pregnant woman, Norma McCorvey, but known as Jane Roe, sought an abortion in the state of Texas where abortion, by law, was a criminal offense. Roe challenged the Texas statute arguing that it was unconstitutional (Landmark Supreme Court Cases 2). At the same time of Roe’s challenges, young lawyers, Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee, were seeking a plaintiff to challenge the Texas abortion laws. The trial did not end in time for Roe to get an abortion, but she kept fighting for future women in her same situation ("Roe vs Wade." TheFreeDictionary.com). Up against the District Attorney of Dallas, Texas, and Henry Wade, Jane Roe argued that the statutes regarding abortion were unconstitutionally vague and violated her first, fourth, fifth, ninth, and fourteenth amendment rights (Landmark Supreme Court Cases 4). Roe was “unable to have a ‘legal’ abortion in Texas because her life did not appear to be threatened by the continuation of her pregnancy” (Landmark Supreme Court Cases 2). Although other jurisdictions offered legal abortions, Roe argued that she could not afford to travel to another jurisdiction and that she had a right to have an abortion “performed by a competent, licensed physician, under safe, clinical conditions” (Landmark Supreme Court Cases 2). Texas refuted the use of the
The Roe v. Wade case, brought before the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973, resulted in the Court’s determination that women have the constitutional right to have an abortion prior to when the fetus is viable, meaning when it can survive on its own outside the woman’s womb. Since this decision was handed down, Roe v. Wade has been the subject of a constant, divisive public and political debate regarding its moral, ethical and constitutional merits. The plaintiff, Norma McCorvey, who represented all women who are pregnant in the case, used the alias “Jane Roe.” The defendant was the county of Dallas, Texas. Roe’s claim charged that the abortion law in Texas was in violation of the constitutional rights of her and all other pregnant women. The Supreme
No other element of the Women’s Rights Movement has generated as much controversy as the debate over reproductive rights. As the movement gained momentum so did the demand for birth control, sex education, family planning and the repeal of all abortion laws. On January 22, 1973 the Supreme Court handed down the Roe v. Wade decision which declared abortion "fundamental right.” The ruling recognized the right of the individual “to be free from unwanted governmental intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person as the right of a woman to decide whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.” (US Supreme Court, 1973) This federal-level ruling took effect, legalizing abortion for all women nationwide.
In 1973, in what has become a landmark ruling for women’s rights, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of a woman’s right to an abortion. Ever since, individual states have adopted, altered, and/or mutilated the edict to fit their agendas – Texas included. However, the decision made by the justices in Roe v. Wade didn’t set clear cut, inarguable demarcation lines, which has allowed the fiery debate to consume the nation. Rather than establishing a legal ruling of what life is, or is not, the Supreme Court has remained silent on the issue.
Roe and her attorneys asked the federal district court to declare that the Texas abortion statute violated her rights under the Constitution. They also asked the court t...
Abortion is a controversial issue in the United States and internationally even when it is legalized. Though women in the United States are able to receive abortions nurses still have many concerns about the ethical issues surrounding abortion. One of the biggest ethical dilemmas is whether the nurse’s role as a caregiver extends to the fetus. This paper will explore the issues faced by nurses who believe they should care for the fetus. If the definition of a patient includes the fetus then providing abortions is contrary to the nurse’s role as caregiver; however, the mother is definitely a patient and must be cared for as well. It is the nurse’s responsibility to support the woman’s decision so that she may obtain an abortion safely. Nurses who put the life of the fetus first are allowed to refuse to participate in an abortion, but this may affect the way women receive nursing care.
Abortion may be one of the most controversial topics in America today. Abortion is defined as “the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus” (cite dictionary). There are really only two sides on people’s opinion on abortion; pro-life which means abortion should be outlawed and pro-choice which means a woman should be able to decide whether she wants to keep her baby. Thousands of protests and riots have begun due to the fact pro-life activists believe abortion should become illegal. Both sides bring valid points to support their decision that could sway any person’s thoughts. The Roe v. Wade law has allowed abortion to be legal in the U.S since 1973 (Chittom & Newton, 2015). The law “gives women total control over first trimester abortions and grants state legislative control over second and third trimester abortions” (Chittom & Newton, 2015). Ever since the law was put in place, millions of people have tried to overturn it and still
The Roe V. Wade court case unfolded when in 1970 two women lawyers brought on a lawsuit on behalf of “Jane Roe”, a pregnant, single woman. They claimed that a Texas law that banned abortion except to save the life of the mother was unconstitutional. The case reached the Supreme Court in 1973, and the court came to the final decision that the law was unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment’s right to privacy clause. This ruling affected laws in 46 states that banned abortion and cleared the way for women to receive proper medical treatment when pursuing abortions.
In our society, there are many ethical dilemmas that we are faced with that are virtually impossible to solve. One of the most difficult and controversial issues that we are faced with is abortion. There are many strong arguments both for and against the right to have an abortion which are so complicated that it becomes impossible to resolve. The complexity of this issue lies in the different aspects of the argument. The essence of a person, rights, and who is entitled to these rights, are a few of the many aspects which are very difficult to define. There are also issues of what circumstances would justify abortion. Because the issue of abortion is virtually impossible to solve, all one can hope to do is understand the different aspects of the argument so that if he or she is faced with that issue in their own lives, they would be able to make educated and thoughtful decisions in dealing with it.
The case of Roe v. Wade was an important turning point in the public health policy. Before 1973, the state of Texas prohibited legal ...
Those who adamantly oppose abortion are regarded as pro-life and those who are supporters of abortion are considered pro-choice by contemporary standards. Even among those who advocate abortion, there are discrepancies in their views such as up until what point in the pregnancy is abortion morally permissible. In my opinion, abortion is morally permissible at any stage in a woman’s pregnancy. This is ethically acceptable because a woman should have the right to control what goes on within her body. Along with this, fetuses are still far from personhood (having the qualities of a human being); therefore, we cannot liken abortion to any variety of murderous activity.