Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
technology as a threat to privacy
government surveillance cons
technology as a threat to privacy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: technology as a threat to privacy
Many people are excited when it comes to the new technological advances and next-generation devices that are being invented and discovered. The world is advancing at an extremely fast rate; so fast that it's nearly impossible to keep up with the latest and greatest. The “latest and greatest”, however is not exactly what people think. Some of the more interesting inventions range from giant billion dollar global satellites that record and store your every text and call to the seemingly harmless front cameras on your iphones that could be on and recording at any given moment. This is such a crisis that a recent study from MIT by Gary T. Marx showed that technology has become so bad that “The ratio of what an individual knows about himself (or is capable of knowing ) compared to what a government official can obtain as far as personal information is shifting towards the official.” Just the sheer thought that someone has the ability to know more about you than yourself shows just what technology is capable of. The only solution to such a problem like this would be for the government to be public about every bit and byte of data they collect and provide the people a way to know when their information is being collected.
The reason for not going for a complete removal of government spying is simply a case of the ends justifying the means. Fortunately our government believes there is actually some genuine good that comes from invading everyone's personal information. One of the major government-proposed benefits is stopping terrorism. With just a few key words, an individual's text messages can be flagged and prioritized for review as a possible terrorism attempt. According to a recent 2013 survey from the Pew Research Center, 56% of Am...
... middle of paper ...
...s the people to have this right, while still being able to operate and perhaps prevent terrorism for real.
Works Cited
Marx, Gary T. "Privacy and Technology." Privacy and Technology. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Mar. 2014.
Nakashima, Ellen. "NSA Phone Record Collection Does Little to Prevent Terrorist Attacks, Group Says." Washington Post. The Washington Post, 12 Jan. 2014. Web. 01 Apr. 2014.
"Majority Views NSA Phone Tracking as Acceptable Anti-terror Tactic." Pew Research Center for the People and the Press RSS. Pew Research Center, 10 June 2013. Web. 1 Apr. 2014.
Avirgan, Jody. "A Running List of What We Know the NSA Can Do. So Far." The Brian Lehrer Show. New York Public Radio, 17 Jan. 2014. Web. 01 Apr. 2014.
Mick, Jason. "DailyTech - Audit: NSA Agents Broke the Law Nearly 3,000 Times from 2011 to 2012." DailyTech.com. DailyTech LLC, 16 Aug. 2013. Web. 29 Mar. 2014.
The aftereffects of the September 11, 2001 attacks led to Congress passing sweeping legislation to improve the United States’ counterterrorism efforts. An example of a policy passed was Domestic Surveillance, which is the act of the government spying on citizens. This is an important issue because many people believe that Domestic Surveillance is unconstitutional and an invasion of privacy, while others believe that the government should do whatever is possible in order to keep the citizens safe. One act of Domestic Surveillance, the tracking of our phone calls, is constitutional because it helps fight terrorism, warns us against potential threats, and gives US citizens a feeling of security.
Government seems to take away more privacy than they say they protect. In 1984 the citizens were constantly being monitored no matter where they were, there was no escape. "It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away" (Orwell 62). Members of the party were constantly being monitored, at even the slight sign of disloyalty they would be apprehended by the Thought Police, striking fear into the people. People had no privacy due to the government and this can now be seen today. Referring to the NSA "The agency has circumvented or cracked much of the encryption, or digital scrambling, that guards global commerce and banking systems, protects sensitive data like trade secrets and medical records, and automatically secures the e-mails, Web searches, Internet chats and phone calls of Americans and others around the world"(Lopez np). Growing use of internet and technology makes it easier for the government to spy on us. Like in 1984 they will soon be able to track our every move. There is no way to completely remove ourselves from technology, there's are steps to take to protect privacy. A solution is to keep more records on paper instead of online. Also, what is posted on social networks should be limited. The less information you give them, the less the government knows.
Edward Snowden is America’s most recent controversial figure. People can’t decide if he is their hero or traitor. Nevertheless, his leaks on the U.S. government surveillance program, PRISM, demand an explanation. Many American citizens have been enraged by the thought of the government tracing their telecommunication systems. According to factbrowser.com 54% of internet users would rather have more online privacy, even at the risk of security (Facts Tagged with Privacy). They say it is an infringement on their privacy rights of the constitution. However, some of them don’t mind; they believe it will help thwart the acts of terrorists. Both sides make a good point, but the inevitable future is one where the government is adapting as technology is changing. In order for us to continue living in the new digital decade, we must accept the government’s ability to surveil us.
According to John W. Whitehead, “The fact that the government can now, at any time, access entire phone conversations, e-mail exchanges, and other communications from months or years past should frighten every American.” (Whitehead). The NSA
Whether the U.S. government should strongly keep monitoring U.S. citizens or not still is a long and fierce dispute. Recently, the debate became more brutal when technology, an indispensable tool for modern live, has been used by the law enforcement and national security officials to spy into American people’s domestic.
The recent terrorists attacks of 9/11 has brought security to an all-time high, and more importantly brought the NSA to the limelight. Facts don 't change however, terrorist attacks are not common as history has shown. So what has domestic surveillance actually protected? There are no records to date that they have stopped any harm from being caused. If it is well known by every American that they are being watched, then why would a terrorist with the intention of harming use these devices to talk about their heinous acts? The real criminals are smarter than this, and it has shown with every attack in our history. Petty acts of crime are not what domestic surveillance should be used for. Terrorism has been happening for decades before any electronics were introduced, and even in third world countries where electronics are not accessible. The government needs a different way to locate these terrorists, rather than spy on every innocent human being. Andrew Bacevich states in his article The Cult of National Security: What Happened to Check and Balances? that until Americans set free the idea of national security, empowering presidents will continue to treat us improperly, causing a persistent risk to independence at home. Complete and total security will never happen as long as there is malicious intent in the mind of a criminal, and sacrificing freedoms for the false sense of safety should not be
Solove, Daniel J. "Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have 'Nothing to Hide'." Chronicle of Higher Education. 15 May. 2011: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 17 Feb. 2014.
Cell phone privacy has become quite an issue over the past few years now that cell phone use is prevalent among most of the world. There have been many articles and news stories circling around about how the government is tracking every move on our cell phone. This includes the government and other entities recording our conversations. Many people view this as a violation of privacy because their expressed thoughts and feelings are being recorded and listened to by someone somewhere. Another ethical concern that this brings about is the violation of the privacy protections of the fourth amendment. Law enforcements officials have the right to access personal location data without giving probable cause to the judge (ACLU 1). While this can create an unnerving feeling I believe the government has taken these measures to keep the country safe. If the government can prevent...
Tomescu, Madalina, and Liliana Trofin. "Identity, Security and Privacy in the Information Society." Contemporary readings in law and social justice 2.2 (2010): 307-12. Print.
As society has progressed, there have been many new innovative and unbelievable developments in almost all aspects of life that have ultimately created an impact. More specifically, advancements in technology have rather had a much larger and intense impact on society as it continues to grow. Technology has allowed for many great and useful applications that has made life much easier and convenient. However, many aspects of technology have given a rise to a number of social and ethical issues, causing numerous debates and concerns. One of the more prominent concerns deals with the issue of privacy rights.
Technology is constantly changing, growing, and evolving but with each change in technology we risk our own privacy. With each new update we get we are told it improves our network or life but in reality it makes it easier to invade our privacy just like in the novel 1984 by George Orwell. There are many parallels between 1984 and our present day like the over watchful eyes of the government for our own good.
Richmond, Riva. "12 Ways Technology Threatens Your Privacy (and How to Protect Yourself)." Switched. N.p., 14 May 2009. Web. 11 Mar. 2014. .
However, government agencies, especially in America, continue to lobby for increased surveillance capabilities, particularly as technologies change and move in the direction of social media. Communications surveillance has extended to Internet and digital communications. law enforcement agencies, like the NSA, have required internet providers and telecommunications companies to monitor users’ traffic. Many of these activities are performed under ambiguous legal basis and remain unknown to the general public, although the media’s recent preoccupation with these surveillance and privacy issues is a setting a trending agenda.
Privacy from governments has been under assault increasing amounts in the last 100 years. Technology has revolutionized the concept, as before we had microphones, telephones, wiretaps, video cameras, someone would actually need to trespass to violate your privacy. For example, you would need to actually be in someone?s house to eavesdrop on his or her conversation without technological help[1]. Privacy protection can be looked at as how far society can intrude into a person?s personal affairs.
Powell, Robert. "Four Ways Technology Invades Your Privacy." Lovemoney.com. N.p., 5 Oct. 2011. Web. 15 Apr. 2014.