Persuasive Essay Outline
1. Introduction
A. The Hook - When we hop online, we sometimes take for granted that we have virtually unlimited access. For the most part, we can look at any website we want, whenever we want. We can watch any video, listen to any song, stream any podcast, email any friend and find almost any piece of information we can imagine. Anything we could ever want access to is always there and waiting for us. What makes that possible is "Net Neutrality."
B. What Net Neutrality actually is - Users connect to the internet through cables and satellites owned by internet service providers. The providers are usually telephone and cable companies. These companies are not allowed to tamper with or alter the information that is passed through these channels. It doesn't matter whether it's Google or Yahoo, youtube or twitter, everyday citizens or business tycoons. Everybody's website gets the same speed and the same treatment. That is called net neutrality. Net neutrality is the principle that Internet service providers should treat all data on the Internet equally, without discriminating or charging differentially by user, content, site, platform, application, type of attached equipment, and modes of communication. This guarantees a level playing field for all Web sites and Internet technologies. But all that could change.
C. The Dilemma - The biggest cable and telephone feel as though an open internet is unconstitutional. These companies would like to charge more money for faster access to Web sites, speed to run applications, and permission to plug in devices. These network giants believe they should be able to charge Web site operators, application providers and device manufacturers for the right to use the ...
... middle of paper ...
... net neutrality.
5. Conclusion
Works Cited
Franken, Al. "Net Neutrality Is The 'Free Speech Issue Of Our Time': US Senator." International Business Times. Progressive Change Campaign Committee, 7 May 2014. Web. 17 May 2014.
Karr, Timothy. "Free Speech in the 21st Century." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 09 May 2008. Web. 17 May 2014.
Leiner, Barry M., Vinton G. Cerf, David D. Clark, Robert E. Kahn, Leonard Kleinrock, Daniel C. Lynch, Jon Postel, Larry G. Roberts, and Stephen Wolff. "Brief History of the Internet." Brief History of the Internet. Internet Society, 2014. Web. 17 May 2014.
Liebling, A.J. "Do You Belong in Journalism?" The New Yorker. The New Yorker, 14 May 1960. Web. 17 May 2014.
Say, My. "How Internet Access Can Boost The Economy And Social Equality." Forbes. Forbes Magazine, 25 Apr. 2014. Web. 17 May 2014
Although the net neutrality debate didn’t come into the spot light so long ago, it has sparked controversy in the communications world. This concept provides a positive impact to the consumers, competition and network owners/internet service providers. It broadens the aspect of equality, which the open Internet was first based on. The profound effects on the aforementioned players provide a supported purpose to regulate the notion of net neutrality.
Schmidt, E. E., & Cohen, J. (2014, March 11). The Future of Internet Freedom. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from
A recent and hotly debated topic among businesses, politicians, and internet users in the United States is that of net neutrality. With the rise of the internet over the past few decades, laws and regulations have struggled to keep up with the ever changing environment. As such, the problem of whether net neutrality should be enforced, and to what extent, has been a dividing issue. This problem has come into the public’s attention recently due to infringements and controversy surrounding policies by Internet Service Providers (ISPs). In the following paragraphs, I plan to first define the concept of net neutrality, related topics which are crucial for an informed ethical discussion of the topic, and also related cases in which net neutrality
Tim Wu is known as “the father of Net Neutrality” for first coining the term “Net Neutrality”. He is a professor at Columbia Law School and the director of the Poliak Center at Columbia Journalism School. He commonly talks about other topics such as copyright, private power and free speech. Wu believes that net neutrality can prevent companies and carriers to offer “special” treatment to one specific provider instead of another. According to Wu, Net Neutrality benefits anyone in some way and believes that Internet transparency is critical because carriers fail to tell what services they provide for the user. At the core of Net neutrality, there is a free speech principle. It allows speakers and innovators to reach people that they would not
ISPs, including ATT, express concern about the proposed rules of Net Neutrality that would prohibit it from slowing competitors’ web traffic or accessing content (Shatz). By not allowing the ability for ISPs to regulate its network and the bandwidth that moves through it, it can cause a variety of problems that un...
...s article “Ma Bell’s Revenge: The battle for Network Neutrality” shows us in a just a few of the hundreds of arguments which have been brought up over the proposal of network neutrality. Network neutrality essentially means that all data gets treated the same by an ISP or service, whether it be an incoming email or a gigantic video file, it’s is based on the principle that Internet users should be in control of what content they view and what applications they choose to use on the Internet. The Internet has operated according to this neutrality principle since its earliest days. In other words, net neutrality is about equal access to the Internet in terms of overall speed. Just as telephone companies are not permitted to tell consumers who they can call or what they can say, broadband carriers should not be allowed to use their market power to control activity online.
Leiner, Barry. "Internet." Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica Online Academic Edition. Encyclopedia Britannica Inc., 2013. Web. 30 Nov. 2013
Imagine having to pay an extra $10 a month just so Netflix would stream fast enough for you to watch movies, or being an app developer and having to pay AT&T millions of dollars just so your customers can access your app on their network. These are the types of things that are prohibited through Net neutrality regulations. Net neutrality is the principle that all the traffic on the internet must be treated without discrimination, be it commercial or political. On December, 14, 2017, The Federal Communications Commision voted to implement chairman Ajit Pai’s plan to end Net Neutrality, removing the regulations that protect us from the shady profit seeking ways of powerful telecommunication giants. The protection of these regulations is imperative
Federal Communications Commission has (Cano 712). This court case set that companies must be classified as common carriers if the FCC wants to prevent unreasonable discrimination and blocking websites that are lawful and competing with the company’s own website. So to prevent this from happening the FCC must reclassify again. Net neutrality is necessary to consumers because of how much the internet is needed in today’s society. Without the equal access to the internet, people may be unable to complete certain tasks which their jobs or government requires of them. This leaves the poor at a disadvantage as they may be unable to pay for increased prices. It also makes it increasingly more difficult for them to go about their lives as the internet has become woven into the fabric of our society. The principles of net neutrality need to be upheld in order to protect the freedoms of the users that are defined by the FCC. People should not have to go through unreasonable barriers in order to access content that is
The concept of Net Neutrality is one with large amounts of controversy behind it. The idea that the internet would give certain types of traffic priority, such as web page requests over video streaming, is necessary to support network growth while others stake the claim that giving this priority undermines the established internet principles of free speech and non-exclusivity. The Federal Communications Commission has put policies in place to strive to a more neutral internet, one such policy being the Open Internet Order. There is heavy debate over whether the internet should be neutral and around whether or not there should be regulations in place to dictate what contents can travel faster than others can. We will be working for Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) in support of net neutrality. Markey argues that net neutrality law is the “Declaration of Independence for the Internet,” where restrictions set on certain types of content on the internet do not limit freedom of expression.
The creation of the internet has truly changed the world in drastic ways. However, his change is directly influenced by huge companies that provide data. Net neutrality is the principle that all internet data providers should treat data the same and not discriminate against a certain person, website or company. Under these rules, internet providers can’t block, censor, or slow down certain data. Recently though, many companies have been fighting the repeal of net neutrality. I believe that net neutrality is important for the stability of the internet and the companies that rely heavily on the internet to spread their ideas, products and information.
Net neutrality is the principle that internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites. Net neutrality has been a problem to people who used net neutrality since 1990. Between 2005 to 2012
Why should we be worried about the open internet? In the early 1990’s modern internet was introduced. After the increase in traffic flow (internet use) many large IPS (Internet Service Providers) were caught slowing data from popular websites to thousands of US businesses and residential customers in dozens of cities across the country. As a result, the Obama administration insisted on new Net Neutrality rules, meaning IPS’s could not block different websites or apps, slowing of services, or no discrimination amongst companies, which is causing many debates and concerns. Net Neutrality is the guiding principles for an open internet. The freedom of the web is in danger, and as the consumers we must preserve the freedom of the open internet. Substantial Internet Service Suppliers are attempting to hinder the internet and raise charges for Americans to use the web and only the American consumers can restrict them from having complete control. Without net neutrality the open internet could fall into the
Net neutrality is the basic principle that “the government who is in charge should oblige all of the internet service providers to always and equally treat all the data that is being sent around the web and to not discriminate against any type of user or company. This means that internet service providers cannot block or slow down in any way websites or any online content.” (Gilroy 1). The main issue that will be talked about in this essay is the fact the
When we think of those skilled in the art of rhetoric, we often jump to those we know are trying to convince us of something, like politicians, salesmen, lawyers, etc. We do not always consider corporate CEOs part of that group though Netflix CEO, Reed Hastings, would have us believing another thing. On March 20th, 2014, Hastings published an article titled “Internet Tolls And The Case For Strong Net Neutrality” on Netflix’s official blog. Just under a month before the blog was posted, Netflix settled a deal paying Comcast, America’s largest cable and Internet service provider (ISP), for faster and more reliable service to Comcast’s subscribers (Cohen and Wyatt). These “internet tolls” go against the culture of net neutrality in America, which in its essence is when no piece of information is prioritized over another on broadband networks. Hastings took to their blog to advocate for net neutrality and against abusive ISPs. Whether he was conscious of his rhetorical finesse or not, he wrote quite convincingly thus turning this blog into an excellent rhetorical artifact. Reed Hastings’ blog post aims to convince American Internet consumers that strong net neutrality is important by appealing to their values of choice, frugality and empathy while simultaneously making ISPs seem ill intentioned and Netflix seem honorable.