Sociology and Social Norms

1262 Words3 Pages

The first decade of this millennium witnessed a dramatic awakening concerning the role of gender which had its marked impact on gender roles. As Wharton states, “the study of gender emerged as one of the most important trends in the discipline of sociology in the twentieth century” (1). This emergence prompted many theories regarding gender issues, which in turn, “propelled the sociological study of gender from the margins to become one of the central features of the discipline” (Wharton 2). Though every group is uniquely structured in a societal set up based on categories, the colossal development of research on gender issues clearly shows that all social interactions, and the institutions of human progress, are biased in the case of gender in some manner or other (Wharton 2).
The Oxford dictionary defines the word gender as “being male or female”. It also explains the term as “the members of one or other sex” ("gender"). However, the two above-mentioned usages of the term gender appear to be too simple, as the word gender seems to have a deeper meaning than just a reference to the biological differences between male and female. World Health Organisation explains gender as the “socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities, and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for men and women”.
In sociology, the term gender refers to the differences suggested by the society while categorising human beings as masculine and feminine. Therefore, gender is not biological, but by how people look at the roles of men and women. A role is a “comprehensive pattern of behaviour that is socially recognized, providing a means of identifying and placing an individual in a society” ("role"). Roles are performed according to social ...

... middle of paper ...

... then having written Dance Like a Man, I was prepared to take on the gender issue head on, and I think that was a powerful metaphor. Again, you know, the play is misread and, you know, people tend to focus on the medical details but that’s really not what the play is about. It’s a metaphor either for being born equal as male and female and sharing so much more and with the surgical separation comes a cultural distinction and prejudices as well, but on another level, it could also deal with the individual having the male and female self…
He also comments that,
I see Tara as a play about the male self and the female self. The male self being preferred (if one is to subscribe to conventional categories of masculine traits and feminine traits) in all cultures. The play is about the separation of self and reluctant angst (Subramanyam 129).

Open Document