Social Media and the Law

1582 Words4 Pages

The First Amendment, granting Americans the right to freedom of press, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly and freedom to petition the government, has been one of the most heavily debated since its ratification in 1791. For years, court cases pertaining to the amendment have abounded, particularly in relation to the freedom of speech. From cases defining obscenity to those allowing for expression, the meaning of the freedom of speech has changed greatly through the years. Similarly, so has the freedom of press. As technology evolves – from the first printing press to Google Glass – so too does the media. New media calls for new laws and precedents, and social media has been no exception. The rapid pace and wide-spread accessibility of the internet and social media has caused a vacuum for laws pertaining to the subject and a need for laws and cases to define what the First Amendment means for these sites. Ideas for the internet started as early as the Cold War. The dormant war created a need for technological advances and led to the idea of a “Galactic Network” (Brief History of the Internet). From those ideas, computer leaders joined together and created ARPANET, the first connection between four host computers. ARPANET then led to the creation of the wide-spread internet, which changed the way information could be shared and distributed (Brief History of the Internet). 1975 saw the invention of email, while 1990 saw the birth of the first website. As these forms of communication took off, the application and scrutiny of the First Amendment changed with the changing world (Brief History of the Internet). The first well-known court case concerning freedom of speech and the internet was a 1991 case, Cubby,... ... middle of paper ... ...iel Lynch, Jon Postel, Larry Roberts, and Steven Wolff. "Internet Society." Brief History of the Internet. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Feb. 2014. . McCartney, Anthony . "$430k Love settlement shows tweets can be costly." AP Online 4 Mar. 2011: n. pag. Associated Press. Web. 11 Feb. 2014. "Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act." Electronic Frontier Foundation. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Feb. 2014. . STRATTON OAKMONT, INC. v. PRODIGY INC. Electronic Frontier Foundation. New York Supreme Court. 10 Mar. 1995. Print. Zeran v. American Online. Tech Law Journal. US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit. 12 Nov. 1997. Print. Zillgitt, Jeff. "NBA referee Spooner sues Associated Press, reporter." USA Today 15 Mar. 2011: n. pag. USA Today. Web. 12 Feb. 2014.

Open Document