In the past, there have been several studies about eye-gaze patterns in turn-taking. One of these studies is that of Vertegaal et al (2001), which was to verify if eye gaze could predict to whom conversational partners are speaking or listening to in a multi-user environment. By multi-user environments the experimenters mean a conversation with three or more actors involved. In their introduction Vertegaal et al (2001) present several different predictions about the research. In their first hypothesis they argue that “significantly more time is spent gazing at the individual one listens or speaks to, than at others” (p.302). But to prevent the bias of participants also looking at other conversational partners, they added the second hypothesis …show more content…
(1968). The Effects of Visibility on Interaction in a Dyad. Human Relations, 21, 3-17.
Argyle, M. and Cook, M. (1976). Gaze and Mutual Gaze. London: Cambridge University Press.
Beattie, G. (1980.). The role of language production processes in the organization of behavior in face-to-face interaction. In B. Butterworth (Ed.) Language Production, 1, 69-107.
Chapple, E.D. (1939). Quantitative analysis of the interaction of individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 25, 58–67.
Cline, M.G. (1967). The perception of where a person is looking. American Journal of Psychology, 80, 41-50.
Duncan, S. Jr, Fiske, DW (1977). Face-to-Face Interaction: Research, Methods, and Theory (Wiley, New York).
Foulsham, T., & Sanderson, L. A. (2013). Look who's talking? Sound changes gaze behaviour in a dynamic social scene. Visual Cognition, 21(7), 922-944.
Goffman, E (1964). Behavior in public places. Glencoe, 111: The Free Press.
Hirvenkari, L., Ruusuvuori, J., Saarinen, V. M., Kivioja, M., Peräkylä, A., & Hari, R. (2013). Influence of Turn-Taking in a Two-Person Conversation on the Gaze of a Viewer. PloS one, 8(8), e71569.
Isaacs, E. and Tang, J. (1993) What video can and can’t do for collaboration: a case study. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia ’93. Anaheim, CA:
…show more content…
(1998). Grondslagen van interculturele communicatie. Studieveld en werkterrein. Houten/Diegem: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587-10592.
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587-10592.
Ten Bosch, L., Oostdijk, N., & De Ruiter, J. P. (2004). Durational aspects of turn-taking in spontaneous face-to-face and telephone dialogues. In Text, speech and dialogue, 563- 570.
Vertegaal, R. Van der Veer, G.C., and Vons, H. (2000). Effects of Gaze on Multiparty Mediated Communication. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface. Montreal, Canada: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 95-102.
Vertegaal, R., Slagter, R., van der Veer, G., & Nijholt, A. (2001). Eye gaze patterns in conversations: there is more to conversational agents than meets the eyes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems,
Although many see it as a disadvantage, cross hand-eye dominance may also be advantageous in the sports realm. As described above, cross dominance has been proved to increase success in certain sports like baseball and basketball. There have been multiple experiments that have tested the effects of cross hand-eye dominance on the percentage of free throws a person can make. Most people have hypothesized that the people who are cross hand-eye dominant have a greater chance of making their free throws. This is because when you shoot a free throw people usually shoot at face level which may block the eye on the same side of the shooting hand. Now if you are cross hand-eye dominant, you would not face this problem because the side of your body
Staring involves an interesting conflict. It is an impulse giving us all the potential to be the starers as well as the starees and it is a natural response to our own curiosity bridging a communicative gap. Staring can be a very pleasurable experience as well as a demeaning experience depending on which side of the staring you are faced with. Similar to other bodily impulses, like eating or sex, staring and the way people stare is excessively regulated by the social world. The conflict with staring is between our urge to do it and the social constrains saying we shouldn’t that makes it such an important and intense provocative social exchange. Our society has adapted and has given us different opportunities to come in contact with people from all walks of life. When we simply stroll around the city or turn on any form of media, we see people that are different from us and we are given the opportunity to learn from them. The opportunity that often is not taken. A group of people who were excluded from the public world, were people with disabilities always being the staree and often not the starer. Through Rosemarie Garland-Thomsen’s reading, I will evaluate the roles of the starer and the staree and their impact to the communication of both parties as well as apply these roles to the film, What’s Eating Gilbert Grape and the staring roles within that media.
Ellsworth, P & Carlsmith, J.M (1968). Effects of eye contact and verbal content on affective response to a dyadic interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 15-20.
Eye contact with an individual consists of understanding the client’s culture, paying close attention if eye contact makes the client look un...
The article “Face Engagements” by Erving Goffman discusses in depth the factors of how individuals in today’s society associate with each other through the use of non-verbal communication, the use of eye contact, as well as social cues. Goffman firstly discusses Social Inattention, which is “when a person might stare openly at others and express to then what they feel about what they are seeing with the use of only their eyes (355). Another important way to socially network is through the use of Face Engagement, which is also referred to as encounter. Goffman explains this as “when two or more individuals are in a situation where they may be focused on each other attentively and they may verbally communicate, but it may also be gestures that
Is the male gaze still a relevant concept? Using historical and contemporary visual examples, assess whether the male gaze still exists.
Based upon these former studies, observation was undergone in roughly the same manner, with a new hypothesis in mind. The hypothesis is that when engaged in conversation, male-female dyads make more of overt effort to appear interested in conversation. Since actual conversing was not overheard, and distance between individuals was virtually irrelevant, the significant variables in this study a...
In conclusion, eyes are the important factors when it comes to anyone’s attention and cognition. It is another form of communication and its own language helps with the cognitive development of young infants to adults. Through eye contact, joint attention, and gaze direction, they all help with teaching an infant about nonverbal communication and understanding the emotions and perceptions of other people.
People want full attention and full eye contact, to ensure interest in the topic being discussed. I discovered that when I would talk to someone with my back completely turned to someone was when they were offended the most, rather than when I just didn’t make eye contact but was faced in their general vicinity. I think that most people reacted negatively towards this experiment because of the social norm that involves being polite and attentive towards a stranger. Being rude to someone whom I’ve never met before for no reason broke the common social norms of politeness. From this experiment I learned that it is greatly important to make eye contact with someone during any type of conversation. If not, it is seen as very rude and will result in negative reactions or attitudes, and give the impression to whomever I am engaging in conversation that I am not interested in what they are saying to
Any communication interaction involves two major components in terms of how people are perceived: verbal, or what words are spoken and nonverbal, the cues such as facial expressions, posture, verbal intonations, and other body gestures. Many people believe it is their words that convey the primary messages but it is really their nonverbal cues. The hypothesis for this research paper was: facial expressions directly impact how a person is perceived. A brief literature search confirmed this hypothesis.
Once people talk to each other, they usually have eyes contact. From the eye contacts, it tell us we are sharing the information as a feedback. For example, if were talking to the person without sharing the eye contact with him/her, it will consider as a bad behavior. The person that I did not share my eye contact is my teacher. Instead of talking to her directly, I was looking at the table, and she felt like I am ignoring her. It was bad behave from me.
Eye gaze is essential for evaluating the following objects: liking and attraction, attentiveness, competence, social skills and mental health, credibility, and dominance (Kleinke, 1986), these evaluations provide information about the target of another person’s attention and expression. Therefore, eye gaze helps to obtain information about communicative intentions and future behaviour (Baron-Cohen, 1995). Moreover, according to Patterson’s distinguish between communicative behaviours and indicative behaviours in 1982, only communicative behaviours are driven by a goal or purpose. Thus when infants are using eye gaze for communication, they are subjective to process the information transition. This statement also be demonstrated by many studies. For instance, D 'Entremont and his colleagues tested 24 infants form 3- to 6-month-olds in 1997 and they found that 73% participants followed the adults’ head-turn behaviour to change the direction of their eye
Surprise! Eye contact is a sign that you happen to be a great listener! Now what has the eye got to do with listening? When you keep eye contact with the person you are talking to it indicates that you are focused and paying attention. It means that you are actually listening to what the person has to say. That is where the saying "Don't just listen with your ears" comes from. So "listen" more than talk, everyone loves a good listener especially the opposite gender!
Eye contact can determine a person’s attitude and true feelings. People use eye contact in social situations to determine how and what a person is truly feeling. The amount of distance a person is from another along with the amount of eye contact used, can change the attraction level between two individual. This attraction can change the attitude of both parties towards each other (Goldman, 1980).
I learned a lot about Human Communication in this class when I read the chapter about Nonverbal Communication. Nonverbal Communication is the process of using messages that are not words to generate meaning. I learned that it happens every day. I also learned that is very hard to read or understand depending on the person you are speaking to or with. Verbal and Nonverbal codes work in conjunction with each other. The words we speak or say are used in conjunction six different ways: to repeat, to emphasize, to complement, to contradict, to substitute, and to regulate. I never knew until reading this chapter that we do these things all most every time we communicate. These are things I took for granted until now. I now know that I will pay