In this paper I will be examining two different psychological positions on gender identity. These positions are; binary gender identity and diverse gender identity. After I have explained both positions I will analyze the two and put forth my argument that diverse gender identity captures a more accurate depiction of gender. This psychologically charged debate over gender identity and its presence in society has taken the form of intuitions over social necessity. In where one side is arguing that traditional binary gender norms are no longer relevant in today’s world, and that binary gender norms are damaging to the cultivation of a happy and healthy society. While the other side argues that traditional binary gender norms are paramount for a healthy family, for a proper social dynamics, and for the prevention of damaging individual’s lives. From both sides of the fence proponents have been using psychological analysis and statistics to bolster their claims. For the purposes of this paper I will begin with the pro binary gender identity theorists.
Binary Gender Identity
In order to properly unpack the position of proponents for binary gender identity I will first put forth a concept known as gender essentialism. Gender essentialism, in a nut shell, is the theory that a specific gender, let’s say female, holds a unifying quality that makes it that gender. For those arguing in favor for gender binary norms that unifying quality is biological. In other words, they argue, we are all born a specific gender and by benefit of this unifying biological quality we are concretely that gender. So in short, by this account, one's gender is determined by the sex they are born into. Furthermore, they argue that these...
... middle of paper ...
... doom ourselves to potentially keep striving for the unreasonable.
Works Cited
DiDonato, Matthew D. and Berenbaum, Sheri A. “The Benefits and Drawbacks of Gender Typing: How Different Dimensions are Related to Psychological Adjustment.” Archives of Sexual Behavior April 2011, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 457-463 Web 21 Apr. 2015.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20364305
Eckes, Thomas. Hanns M. Trautner Taylor & Francis "The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender", May 1, 2000 Print.
Ehrensaft, Diane. "Boys Will Be Girls, Girls Will Be Boys" Psychoanalytic Psychology, Vol 28(4), Oct 2011, 528-548. Web 3 Apr. 2015.
http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2011-12010-001/
Witt, Charlotte. "What is Gender Essentialism?" 2011 Web 12 May 2015.
http://pubpages.unh.edu/~cewitt/Site/My_Philosophical_Life_files/What%20is%20Gender%20Essentialism%3F.pdf
Brannon, Linda. "Chapter 7 Gender Stereotypes: Masculinity and Femininity." Gender: Psychological Perspectives. 4th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon, 2005. 159-83. Print.
First coined by Sandra Bem in 1981, gender schema theory encompasses a cognitive account of sex typing by which schemas are developed through the combination of social and cognitive learning processes (Perle, 2011). It is significant to note that through observations of individuals within culture and society, each child is able to observe male and female typical attributes, activities, and actions (Perle, 2011). Ultimately, these perceptions lead to the development of gender segregation and guide the child’s gender-related actions and behavior. Two other critics who have utilized this theory and method are psychologists Jonathan Perle and Angela
Egan, Susan K., and David G. Perry. "Gender Identity: A Multidimensional Analysis With Implications For Psychosocial Adjustment.." Developmental Psychology 37.4 (2001): 451-463. Print.
Lahey, Benjamin B.. "Gender and Sexuality." Psychology: An Introduction. Boston: Mcgraw-Hill High Education, 2007. 407.
This site gives in depth analysis of gender by Dr. Bushong. It explains his theories.
The relationship between sex and gender can be argued in many different lights. All of which complicated lights. Each individual beholds a sexual identity and a gender identity, with the argument of perceiving these identities however way they wish to perceive them. However, the impact of gender on our identities and on our bodies and how they play out is often taken for granted in various ways. Gender issues continue to be a hugely important topic within contemporary modern society. I intend to help the reader understand that femininities and masculinities is a social constructed concept and whether the binary categories of “male” and “female” are adequate concepts for understanding and organising contemporary social life with discussing the experiences of individuals and groups who have resisted these labels and forged new identities.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (1993, April) The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female Are Not Enough Retrieved from http://moodle.csun.edu
Throughout today’s society, almost every aspect of someone’s day is based whether or not he or she fits into the “norm” that has been created. Specifically, masculine and feminine norms have a great impact that force people to question “am I a true man or woman?” After doing substantial research on the basis of masculine or feminine norms, it is clear that society focuses on the males being the dominant figures. If males are not fulfilling the masculine role, and females aren’t playing their role, then their gender identity becomes foggy, according to their personal judgment, as well as society’s.
The sex and gender binary is a socially-constructed classification of sex and gender into two distinct and biological forms of masculine and feminine. The binary is a restricting concept that enforces the ideology that solely two genders exist—it is a social boundary that limits people from exploring gender identity or mixing it up (Larkin, 2016). As Mann depicts it, the binary constrains us to take on one gender identity, and to follow through with the expected roles assigned to that gender. The implications are that it compels people to fit into the binary and follow the patriarchal, heteronormative traditions of society (Mann, 2012). However, the binary was not always so clear-cut, but certain concepts from scientific research such as the
Identities are an important part of the human experience. One of the many identities that creates a person is gender. Society, being the entity establishing social norms and social roles, plays a part in effecting the individual’s gender, and how they choose to express themself. The underlying or overlying identities also have the same effect. Gender is not only an identity, it is a lifestyle inside and out. Gender, like race, class, and sexuality; is not limited to the binary scale, and that is normal, natural, and human. The concept of gender is man-made, but it forces one’s hand to analyze the thought processes behind an individual's perception on gender through self, through society, or through the dichotomy and/or correspondence of the
Feldman, R. (2008). Sexualty and Gender. Understanding Psychology (9 ed., p. 353). New York City: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
In order to discuss the biology of gender identity and sexual orientation, it is necessary to first examine the differences between multiple definitions that are often mistakenly interchanged: sex, gender, sexual orientation, and gender identity. Sexual orientation is defined by LeVay (2011) as “the trait that predisposes us to experience sexual attraction to people of the same sex as ourselves, to persons of the other sex, or to both sexes” (p. 1). The typical categories of sexual orientation are homosexual, heterosexual and bisexual. Vrangalova and Savin-Williams (2012) found that most people identify as heterosexual, but there are also groups of people that identify as mostly heterosexual and mostly gay within the three traditional categories (p. 89). This is to say that there are not three concrete groups, but sexual orientation is a continuum and one can even fluctuate on it over time. LeVay (2011) also defines gender as “the ...
Obviously, we come out of the womb as an identifiable sex, but how we are raised has something to do with our gender identity as well. Twin studies are often used to isolate effects of nature and nurture because they have the same genes, but can technically be raised in completely different environments. Although not ideal, twins can be separated at birth and be completely different due to their upbringing. In the end, there is still the confusing question of whether or not we were born this way (like Lady Gaga would say) or do we behave solely shaped by our upbringing and life experiences. We can all agree that we have traits that are encoded by our genes, but can still shape who we want to be. Not only do I believe that biological factors influence sexual orientation, but environmental and social factors do as
Seligson, Susan. "Debunking Myth That Girls and Boys Learn Differently: COM prof’s book challenges “toxic” stereotypes." BU Today. 10 Jun 2011: n. page. Print. (JUXTAPOSITION)
Gender identity is whether one feels as though they are a male or female. I never really thought about this much until I started taking classes that talked about gender identity. According to society, I am considered a female because my anatomical make up. However, I have never completely assumed the normal gender role or gender role stereotypes. As a child and teen, I loved to climb trees, lift weights, and play football. I did not enjoy playing with dolls, playing dress up or having tea parties, therefore, I did not do those things. I also was not sensitive like other females. As an adult, I do frequently adhere the gender role or stereotypes. Although, I still enjoy doing many male things like fishing, hiking, and camping but I also cook,