Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of common core state standards
Issues with the common core state standards
The importance of common core state standards
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of common core state standards
Although most senators, representatives and school officials support common core state standards (CCSS), they have not received or researched the history of how CCSS introduced itself. Furthermore, they do not understand that local control is being taken away, which results in the eventual destruction of excellent, local schools, students, and future generations. Two private trade organizations located in Washington, D.C, wrote the CCSS at the request of Achieve, a company created by Bill and Melinda Gates. Thus, CCSS did not arise from the state level but of an interested organization associated with education. Most Americans do not want their local school district sharing their kids’ personal, identifiable data with the federal government or any other group or agency, but CCSS allows information to be shared without parental consent. Being sold as a set of rigorous standards, forty-five states, including Ohio, adopted Common Core. The absence of a cost analysis does not allow the taxpayer know their cost. CCSS did not originate in Columbus, shares student’s private information without parental consent, lacks rigor being benchmarked as internationally observed, and has an uncalculated high cost to the taxpayer.
In 2011, Ohio legislatures amended FERPA. FERPA stands for Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, the part of the Ohio Revised Code that protects a student’s personal, identifiable data from being shared with organizations or companies without a parent’s written consent. With the advancing Common Core Standards, amending FERPA was necessary to make Common Core legal in Ohio, thus sharing students’ personal information with groups, organizations, or companies that claim that they use the data...
... middle of paper ...
... Secondary Schools.” Education Government. U.S. Department of Education, 2 Feb. 2012. Web. 5 Jan. 2013.
“Myths Versus Facts.” Truth in American Education. Truth in American Education, 17 Mar. 2013. Web. 18 Dec. 2013.
“Ohio, PARCC, & the Feds…” Education Freedom Ohio. Wordpress Institute, 25 June 2013. Web. 13 Jan. 2014.
Pullman, Joy. “Feds Spend Millions to Promote Common Core.” Heartlander. The Heartlander Institute, 27 Jan. 2014. Web. 29 Jan. 2014.
Ravitch, Diane. “Why I oppose Common Core Standards.” Washington Post. 26 Feb. 2013. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 17 Dec. 2013.
Strauss, Valerie. “New Common Core test: Worth the Price?” The Washington Post. The Washington Post Company, 24 July 2014. Web. 29 Jan. 2014.
Thompson, Andy. "Why I Proposed H.B. 237 to Repeal Common Core in Ohio." Ohio Conservative Review. OCR, 21 Nov. 2014. Web. 2 Feb. 2014.
Education." Midwest Quarterly 44, no. 2 (Winter2003 2003): 211. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost (accessed April 11, 2014).
Guthrie , J. W., Heyneman, S. P., & Braxton , J. M. (2002).Encyclopedia of education . (2nd ed., pp. 283-289). Farmington Hill, Michigan: Cengage Gale.
Forty-two states have adopted Common Core State Standards. These standards were created to focus only on English and Mathematics. In effect of states adopting Common Core Standards, all other subjects taught in school seemed less important. History and Science standards are no longer stressed. Students are limited to being proficient in only two subjects. The Common Core deprives students’ ability to be skilled in multiple areas. These standards do not provide a slight “break” from the challenging fast past teaching of English and Mathematics. In addition to limiting education to English and Mathematics, Jill Bowden explains that the Common Core is affecting kindergarteners by taking “away from materials that encourage playful learning.” (36).
Neill, Monty. "The No Child Left Behind Act Is Not Improving Education." Education: Opposing Viewpoints. New York: Greenhaven, 2005. 162-68. Print.
Another major criticism of the “No Child Left Behind” deals with the implications of using a standardized test as means of assessing achievement.
The proposed Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act identifies key factors for college and career-ready students. The act asks that states adopt rigorous college and career ready standards in English/language arts and mathematics along with assessments aligned to these standards. In June of 2010, the NGA Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) released the Common Core State Standards which 45 out of 50 states have currently adopted. Additionally, states are required to develop a system of accountability that rewards successful schools, requires interventions for the lowest-perfor...
Since 2010, there were 45 states that have adopted the same educational standards called Common Core State Standards (CCSS). The initiative is sponsored by the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers and seeks to establish consistent education standards across the states. The Common Core Standards is initiative state-led effort that established a single set of clear educational standards for kindergarten through 12th grade in English and Mathematical standards. These standards help to educate all of the students equally, they help children who move from state to state, as well as they help to prepare students for college and workplace. The common core standard helps to provide a clear understanding for teachers and parents of what is expected of the students to learn. It is designed to help educate our children for the future; it gives them the knowledge and skill they need to be prepared for post secondary education and employment. "The standards are designed to be robust and relevant to the real world." (National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers)
8.) Smith, Chelsea. “pros and Cons of the No Child Left Behind Act.” (2005) < http://
Domenico, Desirae M., Ph.D, and Karen H. Jones. "ERIC - Education Resources Information Center." Education Resources Information Center. N.p., Fall 2007. Web. 26 Dec. 2013.
Strauss, Valerie. "Eight Problems with Common Core Standards." Washington Post. The Washington Post, 21 Aug. 2012. Web. 18 Oct. 2015.
middle of paper ... ... Bibliography Black, Jeffrey. A. A. (1991) The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Second School Readiness [Electronic version].
The Common Core State Standards has been adopted by many states in the United States already. This issue is gaining both positive and negative opinions within the education world and society. Some want to know why the standards were created and what the meaning behind these standards is. What is the reasoning for implementing these standards, and why is there so much controversy that follows. Why do these four words cause such controversy? The following will analyze and evaluate The Common Core State Standards in hopes to understand why education is being overtaken by them.
Lee, Oliver. "Does No Child Left Behind Deserve a Passing Grade?" TakePart. N.p., 6 June 2012. Web. 15 Mar. 2014.
(2014) exclaimed that why do 62 percent of parents think the Common Core is not perfect for their kids, despite it has fascinated some entrepreneurs such as Bill Gates and the secretary of education. In a case in point, parents should get more involved in the education of their children if they do not approve of measures being used. She agrees to the idea of a federal government using incentives to adopt their specific education program, but then again she only sees that parents complaining and not taking action. In another context, “parents have no choice about whether their kids will learn Common Core, no matter what school they put them in, if they want them to go to college, because the SAT and ACT are being redesigned to fit the new national program for education”. (Pullmann, J. 2014, September 24, p. 1). In fact, Porter (1989) states that the Common Core standards became as opposing to teachers and teaching occupation, and the tactics are not good strong enough for enabling teachers to be dependent. The teacher is often understood to be the planned without rules. Moreover, some voices against the criticism of the common core, they believe that it is meaningless because districts are still permitted to select which material goes out with stem the basis stated by the Common Core
“If it’s a school day, during school hours, one-fifth of the total American population consists of public school students K through 12. One in five Americans. And if you count teachers and administrators you are probably going to get pretty close to one-quarter of the population of the county at nay given time on a weekday sitting in a public school building.” – (School, the story of American public education)