(Thrust for Educational Leadership 1999) wrote: Voucher proponents claim that public school educators could learn a lot from private schools and their "superior" practices and outcomes. However, a report from the non-partisan Economic Policy Institute has found that the most important variation between schools lays in the type of community in which they are located (affluent, suburban, inner-city), not whether they are private or public.
Researchers conducted case studies of eight public and eight private elementary schools in California to determine whether there are any identifiable and transferable private school practices that public schools can adopt to improve student outcomes. They discovered:
• Private elementary school employees are not necessarily more accountable to parents than are public school personnel.
• Private school expectations for student outcomes are not more clearly defined.
• Private schools do not provide more meaningful evaluation, supervision or mentoring of teachers, nor are they more selective in hiring teachers than their public school counterparts. Private schools also did not necessarily have more flexibility in firing teachers.
• Private schools do not necessarily focus more on issues such as values and behavior.
• Private school innovations do not necessarily stimulate improved practices at the public schools with which they compete.
The report found that inner-city private schools shared more characteristics with public schools in low-income communities than with affluent suburban private schools. Likewise, suburban public schools had more in common with suburban private schools than with urban public schools.
The researchers conclude that the report's findings "could have importan...
... middle of paper ...
...erybody can get on a team in a smaller school." Similarly, a child who needs more individual attention might benefit because "it can customize a child's experience a little more."
Finally, I think it is up to each parent to establish what is best for their children. Some children need more attention than others and they learn better in smaller classrooms. What ever route you choose make sure your children are getting a good education.
References
(1999). Differences between public, private schools overstated, study finds. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 29(2), 4. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
Lawrence, L. (1997, April 28). The pros and cons of public vs. private schools. Christian Science Monitor, p. 12. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database
Raymond, Margaret E. (2014, February 1). To no avail: A critical look at the charter school debate. Phi Delta Kappan, Vol.95 (5) pp.8-12. http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=6aa05956-5bfe-43eb-9eec-b90be0fefa60%40sessionmgr113&vid=9&hid=125
When you look at the private schools they meet those goals. It all comes down to the haves and have not’s the people with the most money wins. In this case it is the private schools. The biggest gap between public and private schools is the budgets 14.6% of the public schools ...
The argument that public schools will benefit from the competition that vouchers will encourage is absurd. Public schools accept all students regardless of their academic ability, handicap or family background, while private schools generally do not admit students who they expect will bring their average scores down or who require special accommodations. Competition, even on this uneven playing field, implies winners and losers. When it comes to education, we would hate to see any child on the losing side.
The gap between the nation’s best and worst public schools continues to grow. Our country is based on freedom and equality for all, yet in practice and in the spectrum of education this is rarely the case. We do not even have to step further than our own city and its public school system, which many media outlets have labeled “dysfunctional” and “in shambles.” At the same time, Montgomery County, located just northwest of the District in suburban Maryland, stands as one of the top school systems in the country. Within each of these systems, there are schools that excel and there are schools that consistently measure below average. Money alone can not erase this gap. While increased spending may help, the real problem is often rooted in the complex issues of social, cultural, and economic differences. When combined with factors involving the school itself and the institution that supports it, we arrive at what has been widely known as the divide between the suburban and urban schools. Can anything actually be done to reverse this apparent trend of inequality or are the outside factors too powerful to change?
Public education has been a staple to American society since the mid nineteenth century. However, in the years since, the public school system has developed many flaws. The system that was originally created to enhance the lives of students and better society now causes much detriment. Although public education claims to be the “great equalizer” there are many problems ignored by school reform policies that hinder the learning of children.
In his new budget, President Obama proposed to substantially increase federal spending to improve public schools. Yet steady spending increases of the last three decades resulted in little change in the poor achievement of students that worries many citizens. Much research, however, shows that what works well is parental choice among schools fairly competing for students as in the case of traditional, tuition-based private schools. Rigorous studies comparing students randomly selected or not to oversubscribed private and charter schools as well as large, statistically controlled surveys show that these schools excel in achievement and parental satisfaction.
Private schools have been shown to have a higher level of education than public schools. Private schools also tend to offer more electives for students to choose from, this means they are more exposed to different future professions at an earlier age. However, the average private school tuition in the U.S. for elementary school is $15,945 a year, and $27,302 a year for secondary school. Less wealthy families simply can’t afford to pay these high prices; this makes it so they must send their child to a public school. Public schools aren’t a bad thing but they aren’t at the same academic level as private schools. This will set their child at a disadvantage when they enter college with student who did go to a private school. Their education as a child will have a big impact on how well they do in college if they decide to go. People from public schools now have to compete with people who have had a better education their whole life. They have to compete with these people for jobs in the future and how well someone does in college has a great impact qualification for jobs.
Most of the time parents are often concerned with overpopulated schools being crowded and more prone to bullying. Also many of these children 's parents do not believe that these public schools are giving their children the education they need. (Messerli,2016) In addition these parents want their children to have access to all the benefits that are held in a private school regardless of the price. On other circumstances, parents sometimes also want their kids become more religious, and since most private schools are based on a religious outlook they choose to send them there. There are many types of private schools, they are often categorized based on the school 's funding. They may be characterized as independent or non- profit, all of the private schools are managed by a certain group for example a religious group is often managed by an affiliated board or by the religious institution to whatever one they belong too. A private school is usually categorized as independent or nonprofit. The private schools labeled Proprietary usually are for profit or funding, parochial schools are funded by a church group or a religious
In general, private schools are more focused and dedicated to the education of children. Teachers in private schools often earn more and can be more dedicated when working with parents who are as equally dedicated to their children. Your school is an investment in your child’s future and not a decision to be made lightly. ( http://scsc.essortment.com) In public schools, students are inclined to misbehave because they feel that teachers don’t care about them anyway so they go in thinking that they can do whatever they want and get away with it. Private schools have their own curriculum and if it’s not being followed they don’t have to keep you in their school. With this curriculum come certain rules one must follow while being there. For teachers, some rules that apply are that they set their own standards. Teachers here don’t have a guideline that they all must follow. Each teacher is different and has their own way of teaching that doesn’t have to follow the other teachers way of teaching. In public schools, teachers have a certain curriculum to follow based on the school district in which they teach in.
...mpared to privately funded school sizes. According to (NCES) the average school size for a central city, state-funded school is 1,083 compared to 398 in privately funded school. That means teachers will have an even harder time giving a state-funded the same one on one time when compared to the privately funded school. Since the education is not equal to private schools should be abolished.
Certification also requires ongoing education and occasionally renewal of credentials. As a result of receiving Federal funds, public schools must follow strict teacher certification rules, which do not apply in many private schools. As a result, public school teachers may, in some cases, be better qualified than private school teachers. Researchers at the University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana found, when examining data from a standardized math exam taken by fourth and eighth graders, that if they excluded the influence of family background and socioeconomic factors, public school students did slightly better than private school students. Another con for public education is that there is no cost to attend public school.
Private schools is the best over public schools. They offer more one on one time with the teachers, better extra curriculum activities, and a guarantee safe zone.They help the child reach all of their goals while they are attending their school and they make sure the students are on the right track toward college. Although you have to pay to attend a private school, it will be all worth it in the end. You will never second guess yourself about making the decision for your child to attend private school. After sending your students to private school you will see how great private school really is and hopefully you will recommend more parents to send their child to private school instead of public
Private schools relate to public schools in the testing records that the NAEP has released for public viewing. Due to these scores, private school students are paying for an academic education that they could be receiving at a public school for free. Private schools have an advantage over public schools that allows their students and teachers to have an unyielding understanding of each other. This understanding allows the teacher to accommodate to the specific needs of each student rather than assuming that each student has the same academic abilities and requirements. Public school teachers cannot relate to their students in this way, and they cannot accommodate the needs of each student as well as private schools can do. Public and private schools must be compared and contrasted in order to show which type of schooling is best for
There are many decisions for parents to choose private or public school for their kids. Every parent wants what is best for his or her child. A person's education is one of the most important aspects in determining whether or not they will become a productive member of society. Education is so important. We need to look at both public and private schools to find out if there is a difference. Private schools are a better choice than public school for many reasons. Private encourages strong quality teaching, encourages higher education learning, and inhibit the rampant of bullying.
Certain groups support parents' rights to send their children to private or religious schools but oppose the use of public funds to do so. The main reason for this opposition is because public funding of private or religious education transfers precious tax dollars from public schools, which are free and open to all children, accountable to parents and taxpayers alike, and essential to our democracy, to private and religious schools. Private and religious schools, in turn, charge for their services, select their students on the basis of religious, academic, family or personal characteristics, and are accountable only to their boards and clients.