Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
arguments for same sex marriage
arguments for same sex marriage
views on gay marriage
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: arguments for same sex marriage
Should Same Sex Marriages Be Allowed?
An ongoing debate: Should gay and lesbian couples be allowed to legally marry? In the opposing articles from Newsweek (June 3, 1996), Andrew Sullivan defends the rights of gay marriage in “Let Gays Marry” and William Bennett expresses the opposite view in “Leave Marriage Alone.” Sullivan is one of the editors for The New Republic and has also authored a book entitled Virtually Normal: An Argument about Homosexuality. [Gruber 25] Bennett is best known as the editor of The Book of Virtues and is also the co-director of Empower America. [Gruber 29] Obviously, both parties have had experience in the topics they discuss. Through both articles, the reader is shown both perspectives into the issue of allowing same sex marriage.
First, Sullivan’s argument is based on his beliefs that the gay population deserve the same rights as the rest of America, and that one of those rights is marriage to a significant other. He says they are just like everyone else with the same hopes and dreams. He acknowledges that he’s not asking anyone to change religious doctrine and that it won’t change the way marriage will be practiced in the least bit. In contrast, Bennett’s counter argument shows all the reasons why changing what we have now, marriage between man and wife only, would be bad. He believes that allowing same sex marriages will ruin all that marriage is about in the first place. Marriage began as an institution between man and wife, and he believes that should not change.
Andrew Sullivan bases most of his argument on the logic of the situation, with some emotions in there as well. To him, allowing marriage between a same sex partnership makes just as much sense as a he...
... middle of paper ...
...g argument.
No matter what happens in the future, there will probably be no pleasing both parties. I personally hope to never see the day that marriage will be twisted and distorted to the point that it doesn’t mean what it should: “an honorable estate, instituted of God and built on moral, religious, sexual, and human realities” (Bennett 30). In conclusion, Bennett and Sullivan both present firm arguments, and if I didn’t already have my opinion grounded, I’m not sure which way I’d be swayed. All Americans do deserve the same rights, no matter their personal preferences or circumstances. On the other side, the rest of the American public shouldn’t have to give up something as important as the institution of marriage between man and woman to achieve this. It’s sad that this is even an issue, but I guess that’s something you have to face in the reality of things.
Abstract On June 26, 2015 a divided Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case Obergefell v. Hodges that same-sex couples could now marry nationwide. At the time of the split ruling there were 9 supreme court justices, 5 of the justices were Republicans, and the remaining 4 were Democrats. In high profile cases it is except that the justices will vote along party lines. When the 5-4 ruling was reveled by the following statement. “It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right (Corn,2015).” written by
Tennyson, Alfred Lord. "In Memoriam A. H. H." The Norton Anthology of English Literature, 3rd ed., Vol. 2. New York: Norton, 1974. 1042-84.
Is marriage strictly between male and female, or should it also be open for homosexuals? William Bennett, a well known politician believes in the traditional marriage, being between a male and female. His thesis reads “We are engaged in a debate which, in a less confused time, would be considered pointless and even oxymoronic: the question of the same-sex marriage” (409). Not only is this statement bias, but other elements of his work held problems. The way his case was defended was ineffective to his case. The debate held good statements; it just failed to support the statements. His writing also holds other unacceptable elements, giving his work more reasons to be ineffective. William Bennett’s debate “Against
...he edge as his focus moves internally as he figuratively crawls in to his “cavern” where his mind can only focus on the immediate things around him like the sounds of horses’ hooves and voices. Tennyson finally shifts the speaker out of his inner madness and changes the focus again. This time the Crimean War becomes the escape for the speaker. He is now somewhat aware that his mind is not sane and he looks to the only thing that can give him peace, death. Tennyson’s speaker in his morbidity and inner discourse is tragic, but comments such acts of written eloquence the reader can not help but be trapped by his madness as he finds peace in his final act of madness.
What is marriage? For thousands years, marriage has been a combination between a man and a woman. When they love each other, they decide to live together. That is marriage. But what will love happen between two same sex persons? Will they marry? Is their marriage acceptable? It is the argument between two authors: William J. Bennett and Andrew Sullivan. The two authors come from different countries and have different opinion about same sex marriage. Sullivan agrees with the gay marriage because of human right, on the other hand, Bennett contradicts his idea because he believes that marriage should be between a man and a woman. Even though their theories are totally different, their opinions are very well established.
In Andrew Sullivan 's "For Gay Marriage" (29-33) and William J. Bennett 's "Against Gay Marriage" (33-36), both authors address the issue of legalizing gay marriage, and more specifically the implications it would have on various aspects of society. Sullivan 's article focuses on how the legalization of gay marriage would not drastically change society as it is now, only provide validation and equality in all aspects of life. Bennett 's article focuses on the same specifics of society, such as fidelity and the definition of marriage, as his is written as a rebuttal to Sullivan 's, explaining how legalizing gay marriage would greatly impact society for the worse. Each author 's argument is influenced by either the inclusion or omission of the
Blunden, Edmund and Heinemann, Eds. “Tennyson.” Selected Poems. London: Heinemann Educational Books, 1960. p.1. print.
It is a generally accepted fact that Aristotle's physics and astronomy were the weakest of his areas of study. He made discoveries and developed theories in biology, ethics, and drama that still hold a great deal of importance in those fields today. However, many of his theories and hypotheses were not disproved unitl the nineteenth century and his original concept of a uniform and consistant flow of time was accepted by Newton and still has its place in physics today. We really cannot discount the scientific contributions of a man whose ideas have survived for over 2000 years.
Bennett is a conservative republican who is a strong advocate for family values. The purpose of Bennett’s essay is to expose the downside of Andrew Sullivan’s argument in favor of same-sex marriage. He wants to persuade those who have read Sullivan’s essay to side with him. His audience seems to be primarily middle-aged heterosexuals who already take his stance on the topic.
The subject of this poem is drawn from a line in Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure: ‘‘Mariana in the moated grange.’’ This describes a young woman waiting for her lover Angelo, who has abandoned her upon the loss of her dowry. From the outset Tennyson creates an impression of profound disrepair and decrepitude, the ‘sheds’ are left broken and abandoned, the thatch is ‘worn’ and covered in weeds. Everything is coated in rust, moss or dust, unmoving, inactive and still. This strong suggestion of stagnation recurs throughout, and is emphasized by the refrain of the poem:
Wilde portrays Lady Bracknell’s power and authority through the theme of marriage. The character’s own marriage clearly states who is in charge as seen in the line ‘Your uncle would have to dine upstairs. Fortunately, he is accustomed to that.’ Farce is used to create comedy because the fact that Lord Bracknell is ‘accustomed’ to dining upstairs suggests that this is a common occurrence. Compared to the modern audience, the Victorian audience would’ve interpreted this as more ridiculous since Lady Bracknell’s suggested power over her husband goes against the social codes of the time. It makes her seem more masculine in the eye of the Victorian audience. The idea of a woman with power was not fully accepted although Queen Victoria was on the throne. In many ways, Lady Bracknell is the primary representation of Victorian morality which Wilde suggests cared little of how good a person was as long as t...
During Tennyson’s childhood and maturing adulthood he endured tempestuous events which altered the course of his life and the essence of literary career. The death of his best friend, Hallem, threw him into a phase of darkness, solitude and despair. It was “a period referred to as his ‘”ten years silence”‘(Napierkowski and Rose 270); he was extremely affected by the death “for it shattered all his life and made him desire to die rather than live” (Napierkowski and Rose 270). The potent emotion surrounding death was modeled in his poem Tears Idle, Tears. The poet identified “the source of his poems emotion as rising from his feelings about the death of his college friend…H...
Historically, memory has been a recurring topic in cognition research. Through the years, many scientific findings have helped us to understand how memory works. Since, older adults are the subgroup most affected by frequent memory deficiencies, they would be highly benefited with the advance of the cognitive
Many of Aristotle’s teachings have shown remarkable insight into the human mind, especially considering the time in which he lived. Just as some of his teachings on physics were held as true for nearly 2000 years, many of his teachings on the human mind were well ahead of his time. His method of study and experimentation, followed by logical deduction are the basis for all sciences now, something which was completely new when he wrote of this approach.
“In Memoriam A. H. H.,” a large collection of poems written by Alfred Lord Tennyson, is an extended expression of the poet's grief for the loss of his beloved friend Arthur Hallam. The poem takes the speaker on a journey that describes an individual’s struggle through the stages of grief. In 1969, Elisabeth Kübler-Ross first proposed five stages of grief which include denial, anger, bargaining, depression and finally acceptance in her book titled, “On Death and Dying.” Elisabeth Kübler-Ross’s universal stages of grief are expressed in Alfred Lord Tennyson’s poem “In Memoriam A. H. H.”