Karl Marx's Theory of Capitalism Marxism like functionalism is concerned with the overall picture of
society. Marxism is seen as a conflict theory, Mainly because they see
the primary interests of society as a whole as being made up of
conflicting groups with conflicting interests or beliefs.
We are a very materialistic society. A society made up of those who
have, and those who have not. Marxists sociologists say that there
will never be true social harmony because there are too many
inequalities within our cultural society.
Marx gave names to the haves and have nots, they are known as the
Bourgeoise and the Proletariats. One way of assessing the power of the
upper class is through the study of elites (people who fill the top
positions in each of the major institutions of society); most of the
sociological debates have centered on economic elites and political
elites. (Sociology in focus 5th Edition, 2000, page 53)
The main question asked by Marxist sociologists is how we all can
benefit equally and how can we get rid of the social inequalities
present in our society.
They differ form functionalists in the way that they see the
difference. Marxist sociologists see them as being persistent and not
just as a temporary state of affairs to be overcome. Their theories
state that for the superstructure to be effective, the infrastructure
must function effectively, therefore any changes no matter how small,
within the infrastructure will reflect in the superstructure causing
severe change and possible disturbances. If production costs rise
[...]
Intr...
... middle of paper ...
...s,
but it has been used to disguise the true set of relations that
undergird capitalism.
Criticisms
Marx has faced a number of criticisms. Most importantly, actual
existing communism failed to fulfill its promise. Though these
experiments may have distorted Marx's thought, Marxist theory
certainly did not reflect its practice. Second, history has shown that
workers have rarely been in the vanguard of revolutionary movements,
and indeed have resisted communism in some places. Third, Marx failed
to adequately consider gender as factor in the reproduction of labor
and commodity production. Fourth, some have accused Marx of focusing
far too much on production, without giving enough attention to the act
of consumption. Last, Marx's historical materialist approach
uncritically accepts Western notions of progress.
The Communist Manifesto was published in 1848, a period of political turmoil in Europe. Its meaning in today’s capitalistic world is a very controversial issue. Some people, such as the American government, consider socialism taboo and thus disregard the manifesto. They believe that capitalism, and the world itself, has changed greatly from the one Marx was describing in the Manifesto and, therefore, that Marx’s ideas cannot be used to comprehend today’s economy. Others find that the Manifesto highlights issues that are still problematic today. Marx’s predicative notions in the Communist Manifesto are the key to understanding modern day capitalism.
In Karl Marx’s work, Das Kapital, Marx asserts that capitalism is inherently contradictory. This theory stems from Marx’s analysis of the circulation of capital, which shows that capital can be redistributed and shifted amongst capitalists, but cannot grow. Marx supposes that this is contradictory because, while capital in a system cannot increase, capitalists are forced to constantly innovate to compete with other capitalists. This innovation leads to larger-scale and cheaper production, which one might assume would lead to general public being better off. However, since this increased production, which is caused by capitalism, cannot increase capital, prices stay relatively the same, and workers work for the same amount of time. If Marx’s analysis is correct, and further assumptions concerning how workers view the length of their working day are correct, then the proletariat are bound to push to shorten the working day. This push, unguided by an understanding of individually variable necessary labor times, would cause capitalism, as it is now, to fall.
statues tried to lengthen it by compulsion” ( Section 5 SFNWO ). Marx argued that capitalism withhold the economy and create a recession and collapse of the economy. Industrial and factory working class has to work and be dependent on their employers because they don’t own land and capital (10/16).
Marx’s analysis of social class is that there will always be a divide between the haves and the have not’s. He separates them into two classes the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie signifies the capitalist class, while proletariat signifies the working class. Max Weber’s defines class as “a group of people who have a similar level of economic resources”(p.244). He identifies two main elements of class, material resources, and skill knowledge in the marketplace. In contrast to Marx’s view on class Weber believed that class was not just based solely on ownership of means of production, but could also be based off ownership of other resources and the amount knowledge one has. Pierre Bourdieu’s view on class is that it is based on the concept of cultural capital meaning, “our tastes, knowledge, attitudes, language, and ways of thinking that we exchange in interaction with others”
In Das Kapital, Karl Marx explains alienation, or Entfremdung, a tool of cultural hegemony: the idea that capitalism has caused workers to be alienated from the product of their work, the act of working, their “species-essence” or Gattungswesen, and other workers. America’s public education system was built around the Prussian Industrial-Model, a way of mass producing a docile proletariat labor force through public education, and as such it should not be surprising that capitalist alienation is experienced in schools. Whether through memorization or testing, American schools are teaching the wrong thing: capitalist cultural hegemony.
The Industrial Revolution was the result of many interrelated changes that transformed society from agricultural communities into industrial ones. The most immediate changes on society because of this revolution were on the products that were produced, where, and how. Goods that were traditionally made in homes or small workshops began to be manufactured in large industrial factories. As a result, productivity and efficiency increased dramatically, thereby causing a radical shift in the long-established economies that existed at the time. The Industrial Revolution led to the growth of cities as people moved from rural areas to the city in order to find work. Marx believed that the changes brought on by the Industrial Revolution overturned not only the traditional economies, but also society in general.
The concept of ideology is highly controversial and it has been defined in several ways throughout history. It can be defined as an idea that distinguishes the consciousness of a class at a given historical moment. It also is beliefs adopted for influential purpose of a nation, making them support the status quo. Have you ever wondered what it would be like if we live in a country where everyone had everything equally and there was not a difference in class? In such a society, everyone is equal and there is no privilege which means no high pay and the motivation to succeed in higher levelled jobs such as doctors, lawyers, business owners (everyone owns business basically) will be high. Marxism is a sociopolitical ideology and method of economic change based on materialist and social factor. Marxism states that the economy cannot grow if means of production is controlled by private owners instead by the people. The society can do without feudal lords, land lords, private owners and slave-owners.
Communism, socialism, and capitalism are the three basic forms of economical systems, each evident in the world. Although Karl Marx is portrayed as the father of communism, Marx is able to provide a substantial amount of information about the capitalistic world. In his work, “Capital (1867)”, Marx discusses the nature of commodities, wages, and the relationship between a worker and the capitalist economic system. As a result, Marx portrays workers as human beings who have been exploited in order to maximize production and profit in a capitalistic society. Although Karl Marx wrote “Capital (1867)” over a century ago, Marx’s arguments concerning the various uses of human labor, commodities, and values, have remained relevant in the United States
Through out history money, wealth and capital have dictated a way of life to the masses. Wealth dictated the lives that the rich lived and the lives of the poor that worked for and surrounded them. In some cultures your class could never be escaped in life, you had to wait for your next incarnation, while in other cultures the idea of wealth transcended a life and allowed for growth from one class to another. This is the reality of a capitalist society that was first discussed by Karl Marx in the 19th century.
The definition of utopia is an ideally perfect place especially in its social, political, and moral aspects (dictionary.com). This paper will discuss the changes in capitalism since Marx’s critique in 1848. Marx’s fundamental critique remains correct today. Marx is still correct about his critique of capitalism because even though there have been changes made to capitalism to prevent some abuses, capitalism still produces inequality, reduces the family relationship, destroys small business, and enslaves.
To begin with, capitalism is a type economic system. Simply put, capitalism is the system where workers work for the capitalist and receive wages for their labor. In, Wage-Labour and Capital, Marx explains the exchange between the capitalist and their workers in regards to wages and labor. He wrote:
Karl Marx, in the Capital, developed his critique of capitalism by analyzing its characteristics and its development throughout history. The critique contains Marx’s most developed economic analysis and philosophical insight. Although it was written in 1850s, its values still serve an important purpose in the globalized world and maintains extremely relevant in the twenty-first century.
Workers of the World Unite: You Have Nothing to Lose but Your Chains. Karl Marx, Communist Manifesto. Karl Marx had very strong viewpoints in regards to capitalism, making him a great candidate for this assignment. People constantly debate over whether his ideology holds any grain of truth to them. I believe that although not everything Marx predicted in his writings has come true (yet), he was definitely right on a lot of issues.
According to Marx class is determined by property associations not by revenue or status. It is determined by allocation and utilization, which represent the production and power relations of class. Marx’s differentiate one class from another rooted on two criteria: possession of the means of production and control of the labor power of others. The major class groups are the capitalist also known as bourgeoisie and the workers or proletariat. The capitalist own the means of production and purchase the labor power of others. Proletariat is the laboring lower class. They are the ones who sell their own labor power. Class conflict to possess power over the means of production is the powerful force behind social growth.
Karl Marx was a philosopher, a sociologist, economist, and a journalist. His work in economics laid a foundation for the modern understanding of distribution of labor, and its relation to wealth generation. His theories about the society, economic structure and politics, which is known as Marxism led to him developing social classes. He later on showed how social classes were determined by an individual’s position in relation to the production process, and how they determine his or her political views. According to Karl Marx, capitalism was a result of the industrial revolution. Capitalism is a system that has been founded on the production of commodities for the purpose of sale. Marx defined the