1. Introduction
“The years of slavery are past, The Belgian rejoices once more; Courage restores to him at last, the rights he held of yore, strong and firm his gasp will be; Keeping the ancient flag unfurled; to fling its message on the watchful world: For king, for right, for liberty.” (Belgian National Anthem, 1830). This was what the Belgian sang when they fought for their independence, the song arises some questions on the situation of Belgium before there was a Belgian state or a Belgian Nation.
This paper focuses on the nation and state building of Belgium between the Middle Ages and 1830, as Belgium did not exist at that time this paper examines the situation on the territories belonging to current Belgium. The process of nation-state building in Belgium is explained by defining the concepts of nation and state, then by analysing the system of powers in the Belgian territory and, finally by stating whether or not Belgium was a state or a nation during the analysed periods.
2. Key Concepts
2.1. State
Roberts definition of a modern state is based on certain characteristics, the ruler should be sovereign (supreme authority), have a defined territory, have a legitimate power and be efficient.
2.2. Nation
Gellner defines it as a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular state or territory.
3. Nation and State Building of Belgium
3.1. Middle Ages
After Charlemagne's death, the Carolingian Empire was divided in three parts by the Treaty of Verdun in 834. This division weakened the Empire, many battles took place and it allowed the Viking's invasions from the north. It was around that time that the hereditary character of feudalism and the power of the fiefs, in...
... middle of paper ...
...anish did not manage to centralise their territories but the Austrian had a centralised government which claimed to be absolute. It was not until the French invasions that Belgium was united and was part of an absolute and centralised Republic. However, because of the balance of power, Belgium had to answer to the Dutch which were centralised and absolute but were not recognised by the Belgian because of the differences existing between the two Nations, this led to Belgium's independence.
Belgium became a nation around the start of the 19th Century because it was the first time that they struggled together to be free of people who did not have the same beliefs and history as them. They might not speak the same language, French and Flemish, but they had the feeling that they belonged together and as the Belgian motto says: l'Union fait la Force (Unity makes Strength).
Between 1650 and 1713, the Dutch Republic faced many challenges to it's security, unity and prosperity. In these years, the Dutch Republic faced a decline in trade, increased debt, crushing military defeats and a skeptical, divided society, all of which threatened the vitality of the Republic.
For instance, in 1481, the “Catholic Kings” were what Ferdinand and Isabella were known as. The kingdom of Castile and Aragon were ruled together, but not as countries. It was a union of crowns (Isaacs). “The two kingdoms maintained their separate l...
At Charlemagne's death in 1814 only one of his three sons, Louis, was living. Louis's weak rule brought on the rise of civil wars and revolts. After his death his three quarreling sons split the empire between them by the Partition of Verdun in 1843.
In 768 A.D., Charlemagne at the age of 26, along with his brother Carloman inherited the kingdom of Franks. However, in 771 A.D. Carloman died, making Charlemagne the sole ruler of the kingdom. At this time the northern part of Europe was out of order and unruly. In the south, the Roman Catholic Church was asserting itself alongside the Lombard kingdom in Italy. While in Charlemagne’s own kingdom, the people were becoming and acting as barbarians and neglecting education and faith.
Nelson, Lynn. “The Collapse of the Carolingian Empire” Lectures University of Kansas. November 18, 1999. http://www.ukans.edu/kansas/medieval/108/lectures/carolingian%5Fempire%5Ffall.html
In the essay "The Emperor Charlemagne," Einhard discussed the rise and greatness of this ruler, and gave an in-depth look into who the King truly was. After receiving the Frank kingdom from his father, he more than doubled the previous territory that the Franks already pos...
France first became an independent nation during the French Revolution. This point in time was when the monarchy that had been around for thousands of years was demolished and was replaced by a Republic government. There were other moments of monarchy in the early history of French statehood, but they were brief. Some of these moments of monarchism include the reigns of Napoléon Bonaparte and King Louis-Philippe. When Napoléon fell at Waterloo, monarchism was reestablished by Louis-Philippe. At this point in time, they were still moving toward democratization, but they were no...
Within 1650 to 1713 the Dutch Republic underwent a formidable transformation, which changed its status as a major influence in Europe. The Dutch Republic was a political union of seven provinces that was not only an impressive banking and commercial capital, but the Dutch also had a great navy as well. Additionally, the center of flourishment in the Dutch Republic was Amsterdam, which was the foremost trading and banking center in all of Europe. The changing environment of the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries forced the Dutch Republic into a position of conflict and unbalance, which proved detrimental to their country as a whole. One of the first challenges to the Dutch Republic dealt with military and how countries, such as the English, wanted to snatch the Dutch’s profitable sea trade routes for themselves. As a result of military conflicts, the Dutch Republic’s economy decreased as a whole due to the fact that wars burdened the previously flourishing trade routes and wealthy cities. Another challenge to the Dutch Republic was unity and how Dutch cities began to doubt other provinces of loyalty to one another, which destroyed most efforts of unification for retaliation against the countries attacking the Dutch. Overall, the major decline of the Dutch Republic was a great example of when one part of a nation goes down, the rest of the nation followed suit.
Scott’s work in this essay focuses on the development of universal individual rights around the eighteenth and nineteenth century of French history. The individual was
In early modern europe, from the sixteenth to the early eighteenth century, a revolution in state building transformed what it meant to be a strong state. Modern states were moving away from the archaic feudal and isolationist traditions of warring nobles to more modern ideas of government, from the English Constitutional Monarchy to the Prussian Autocracy, governments and states attempted to and largely succeeded in placing more power in the government. Though still true of parliamentary systems, this was especially important in the development of absolutist traditions-- and how they played off their state's fledgling national identities. By examining two absolutist states, France and Russia, it is clear that the central theme of nation
Throughout the middle ages, many empires were working on expanding their territory, but it was not always a success unless they had the appropriate leadership to guide them in the right direction. The main empire that grew to extraordinary lengths is that of the Roman Empire. Through many conquests and battles and with an amicable government, it attained its fortune. However, on the other hand, there was another government that shared similarities with that of Rome; this was the empire of Charlemagne, otherwise known as the Carolingian Empire, but it failed to have a prosperous eternity.
...e clear that Richelieu was firmly on the side of the monarchy. This taints his advice to some degree: he does not take the complaints of the nobility into account and presents a decidedly one sided view of what makes a good king. This proves to be limiting; perhaps some of the unrest could have been avoided if reconciliation had been pursued instead of a power struggle. Richelieu’s Political Testament is an interesting case study in the political theory of the 17th century, and clearly served as a model for many kingships to come.
Abbe Sieyes was born in 1748. He was a clergyman and a political writer who wrote a very clear message to educate citizens about their rights. He divided his work into three main questions. In his opinion, a nation is “A body of associates living under a common law and represented by the same legislature.” I agree with his definition because he supports the farmhands of the land in France. The third estate citizens who worked really hard to make everything from the other two estates available. They make the highest percentage of France's population (98%) even though they have no right to vote or power in the general estate. He also talked about “What has it been until now in the political order? Nothing." Lastly, “What does it want? Something."
In the 1971 Webster Dictionary the last part of the definition reads, or region linked by common interests. In today’s society most people living in a community aren’t linked by common interests. A lot of people have different interests, beliefs, and way they go about living their lives from their neighbors. A more accurate definition, is, a group of people living in the same locality and under the same government (Dictionary.com). Now wouldn’t that definition be more suitable? It probably best describes most of today’s community actually. Take for example here at Michigan State. There are people most all different cultures, backgrounds, and sexual preferences (please don’t take to offense). Communities are just, for the most part, made up of people who live around each other. They may not like each other, or be like each other but one common interest they do same is they all have dreams.
Where the nation is defined in terms of ethnicity and descent from previous generations. It also includes the idea of a culture shared between members of the group, and usually a shared language.