Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency

1447 Words3 Pages

In addition, FY 2011-2015 Strategic Plan stated different crosscutting fundamental strategies that enhance the way EPA pursue its goals. Some of the crosscutting fundamental strategies are expanding the conversation on environmentalism, working for environmental justice and children’s health, advancing science, research, and technological innovation (EPA Strategic Plan, 2010). Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32) and Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) are the two key public policy components that identify planning and development efforts to GHG emission reduction. Both are part of the goals that EPA is aiming to achieve by the year 2020. AB 32 is the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, which is an environmental law, passed in California to reduce GHG emissions by the year 2020 to the levels of 1990. Also, following the Great Recession of 2008, business enterprises are trapped between abundant opportunities and government regulatory requirements of climate change. The goal of EPA is to ascertain a balance between these such that environmental sustainability can be attained. Businesses in partnership with EPA and financial institutes, can lead the way forward. The synergy between public and private interests on the issue of climate change and sustainable environment can lead into a brighter future for generations to come. However, the role of the public sector in sustaining climate change has been proven in many countries to have the most effect (Ndamba, 2012). For instance, the evolution of environmental sustainability in countries like Norway was actually driven by the Public Sector. Norway was one of those countries to come out with the first green national accounts reflecting their national government's impact on environmental matters (Nda... ... middle of paper ... ...ttp://blog.nixonfoundation.org/2010/06/rn-and-the-formation-of-the-epa-3/ Payne, P. r., & Rosenbaum, S. (2007). Massachusetts et al. v Environmental Protection Agency: implications for public health policy and practice.(Law and the Public's Health). Public Health Reports, (6), 817. Summary of the National Environmental Policy Act (2014). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-national-environmental-policy-act U.S. Office of Personnel Management-OPM (2013). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. OPM. Retrieved form http://www.opm.gov/fedcdp/agencies/epa.asp Wallach, P. (2013). When can you teach an old law new tricks?. New York University Journal Of Legislation & Public Policy, 16(3), 689-755. White House (2014). The Cabinet. The White House. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/cabinet

Open Document