Alienation is a process in which humanity is progressively turned into
stranger in world created by labour. (A. Swingewood 2000 p32). It
succeeds in creating vast accumulations of wealth at one pole of
society, an increase in value of thing achieved only at the cost of
progressive defaulting human life itself. Alienation however, occur
only when humanity having externalised itself, encounter it’s own
activity, it essence, operating as an external, alien and oppressive
power.
Comphrensively, Alienation is the process where by people become
foreign to the world they are living, we can also say, is the
transformation of people own labour into power which rules them as if
by a kind of natural or supra- human law. The origin of Alienation is
FETISHISM-, which means the belief that inanimate things (COMMODITIES)
have human powers that will be able to govern the activity of human
beings. [Estrangement &Alienation].
Marx points out, that Alienation is the human labour, which created
culture and history. The formation of an exchange economic is the
outcome of a historical process, and capitalism is a historically
specific system of production. (Anthony Diggens 1987 p10). Marx
analysis of Alienation in capitalist production start from a
contemporary economic fact, the fact that capitalist advances, the
more impoverished the workers become.
The owner of land and capital makes capitalist mode of production
possible with their enormous wealth. The main point of Marx’s
discussion is that, in capitalism, the material object s which are
produced become treated on a par with worker himself- just as they are
on a purely theoretical level. The worker becomes an ever-cheaper
commodity, the more goods he produces. [Marx] (Ibid p11).
The Worker lacks control over disposal of his product, since others
appropriate what he produces, so that he does not benefit from it. If
the product of labour is alienated, the product itself must be active
alienation. (Ibid p12). Alienated of labour reduces human productive
activity to the level of adoption to, rather than active mystery of
Marx, discusses a certain concept of alienated labor as an unavoidable result of a capitalist system. The framework that he tries to draw in the book is that capitalist system should be blamed for class strafication and alienated labor in the society. In a capitalist society, people suffer from class conflict and property ownership of bourgeoisie. Bourgeoisie owns the big factories and businesses, so then, small manufacturers have to shut down and basically have to join the labors in the big businesses. Workers in the capitalist system are obligated to work for long hours under unhealthy conditions for really low salaries.
With the emergence of an industrial working class that arrived from the farms and countryside new theories and ideologies about the political economy began to appear. Karl Marx, a political philosopher during this time, introduced the idea of "alienation of labor". His theory proposed that labor has the ability to create a loss of reality in the laborer because the laborer himself becomes a commodity or object due to the nature of work. In terms of the roles of women it can be argued that the effect is even greater due to the limited choices of work available. This theme is expressed in literature through the writings of Gilman and Alcott.
Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes, directly facing each other: Bourgeoisie and Proletariat. The Bourgeoisie was of the upper class, shopkeepers, property owners, upper class. The proletariat was the working class, earned minimum wage, labor is their only material value, lower class. Class rankings were apart of the European history as well as the future. Communist wanted to do away with rankings by the country being classless, yet owning nothing, earning just enough to live. This would make each person a paid wage labourer, no matter the title they carried. Marx theory was to live in a classless system and each person have a strong work ethic, as well as
Marx’s idea of the estrangement of man from the product of his labor described the suffering of countless hours or work by the laborer, contributing to the production of a product that he could not afford with the wages he made. He helped to produce a product that only those wealthier than he could afford. As the society around him became more object-oriented, he became increasingly more alienated. In the lager, one factor that distanced the laborer from his product was that he no longer worked for a wage, but for survival. In a description of his fellow worker, Levi wrote, “He seems to think that his present situation is like outside, where it is honest and logical to work, as well as being of advantage, because according to what everyone says, the more one works the more one earns and eats.” Levi pitied his fellow worker for his naivety, as the Lager was not a place of labor for prosperity, but strictly a place of labor by force. One worked in order to live, focusing more on the uncertainty of their next meal, day, or even breath than the product of their l...
individuals, society, or work. Some sociologists believe that alienation is inevitably produced not by the individual but by the shallowness and the lack of individuality in modern society. The concept of alienation has been held to account for behaviour patterns. as diverse as motiveless violence and total immobility. Alienation is a state in which the creations of humanity appear to humans as alien objects.
Karl Marx who was born in 1818-1883 has been established as one of the most influential thinkers and writers of modern times. He is a socialist amongst a philosopher who is recognized for his devotion to economic society and has left a lasting impression on the world. He is mostly respected for envisioning a society where everyone would be happy. Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto in the middle of the 19th century which was an altering time in European history. The Industrial Revolution was changing society rapidly and radically. New technologies were coming out vigorously and many spoke of great changes to come. The idea of social engineering became admired by those that believed in advanced technology and an enlightened world. Many believed in the notion of tearing down old and dysfunctional systems in hopes of replacing them with new and improved visions. Revolts began in Italy then took hold in Paris in February. From Paris they spread to most European capitals and parts of Latin America with over 50 countries affected. Moreover, Marx’s work was published on February 21 1848 during the uprising in Paris and on the eve of the revolution of Berlin and elsewhere. The revolutions of 1848 remain the most widespread wave in European history, but within one year, reactionary forces regained control. Revolutions collapsed, and in most countries, monarchies were re-established. Still, 1848 decisively shaped the European political landscape. In most countries the restored monarchies expanded the power of the liberal bourgeoisie as a bulwark against the proletarian classes. Marx’s work did not cause the revolutions but is best read as an interpretation of the events on the ground and an attempt to direct them. Even though, Karl Marx be...
...(rather than local) being. (13) Thus, although alienation provides an understanding of the problems of capitalism, it does not provide a means of escaping it.
I will be arguing how labor abuse in today's world is exploitation, and is the same type of exploitation that Marx shows in his book The Communist Manifesto. On one hand we have Marx's Manifesto definition of exploitation, which is when one of the working class is not receiving the same value of the product they are creating themselves. While on the other hand The New Yorker Chicken article describes how American owners use of immigrants for lower wages. Which leads right back to Marx's view of exploitation. The effect of hiring immigrants was that U.S workers themselves to be put out of a job. Leading the working class out of money to pay for Chicken from Case Farms.
Marx’s theory of alienation describes the separation of things that naturally belong together. For Marx, alienation is experienced in four forms. These include alienation from ones self, alienation from the work process, alienation from the product and alienation from other people. Workers are alienated from themselves because they are forced to sell their labor for a wage. Workers are alienated from the process because they don’t own the means of production. Workers are alienated from the product because the product of labor belongs to the capitalists. Workers do not own what they produce. Workers are alienated from other people because in a capitalist economy workers see each other as competition for jobs. Thus for Marx, labor is simply a means to an end.
Marx explains the condition. of estranged labour as the result of man participating in an institution alien to his nature. It is my interpretation that man is alienated from his labour because he is not the reaper. of what he sows. Because he is never the recipient of his efforts, the labourer lacks identity with what he creates.
Karl Marx’s article titled Estranged Labor as found in his 1844 Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts pays significant attention to the political economic system, which is commonly referred to capitalism. He further delves into nature of the political economy with a keen focus on how it has negatively impacted the worker or laborer. Therefore, the laborer forms the subject of his critical and detailed analysis as tries demonstrates the ill nature of the political economy. To start with Karl Marx portrays how the political economy as presented by its proponents has led to emergence of two distinct classes in society; the class of property owners and on the other hand, the class of property less workers. According to Karl Marx (2004), proponents of the political economy have introduced concepts such as private property and competition indicating without providing any form of analytical explanation but rather just expecting the society to embrace and apply such concepts. In particular, political economists have failed to provide a comprehensive explanation for division that has been established between capital and labor. Estranged Labor clearly depicts Marx’s dissatisfaction as well as disapproval towards the political economy indicating that proponents of such a system want the masses to blindly follow it without any form of intellectual or practical explanation. One area that Karl Marx demonstrates his distaste and disappointment in the article is worker or the laborer and how the worker sinks to not just a commodity but rather a wretched commodity (Marx, 2004). This is critical analysis of Karl Marx concept or phenomenon on the alienation of the worker as predicted in Estranged Labor in several aspects and how these concepts are ...
Alienation, in Marxist terms, refers to the separation of the mass of wage workers from the products of their own labor. Marx first expressed the idea, somewhat poetically, in his 1844 Manuscripts: "The object that labor produces, its product, stands opposed to it as something alien, as a power independent of the producer."
The first type of alienation is from “product of labor”. This is where the worker is separated from their work. This is basically saying that the work that the worker is creating does not necessarily show their creativity. Marx wrote:
...nvironment. Ultimately, humans are creative, hardworking and productive beings. As we spend the majority of our day at work, we want it to be rewarding and fulfilling. In this theory of alienation, being a worker comes first and being a person comes second. Alienation makes people spend their lives working on things they hardly care about while they make money for someone else as they sacrifice their own interests and goals. Capitalism turns workers into machines and alienates them from their full potential. Workers are not content as they are unable to determine their own paths as they are at the mercy of their employers. Alienation produces boredom, stress, unhappiness, misery and low productivity.
Karl Marx’s theories about class struggle, communism, and social justice can be known as Marxism. Marxism is summed up in the Encarta Reference Library as “a theory in which class struggle is a central element in the analysis of social change in Western societies.” In contrast the Encarta Reference Library defines capitalism as “an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and distribution of goods, characterized by a free competitive market and motivation by profit.” Marxism is the system of socialism of which the dominant feature is public ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange.