Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of paparazzi
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of paparazzi
The paparazzi can receive up to thousands of dollars for candid pictures of celebrities. As celebrities become more popular, the public wants to know what their doing every second of every day, even when they aren’t on camera. The paparazzi make it their job to find those things out
Paparazzi are photographers who repeatedly hunt celebrities, public figures and their families for a chance to photograph them in candid, unflattering and at times compromising moments (Valdes). The paparazzi are self-employed photographers who generally make their living by selling their images to gossip websites, television studios, and magazines (Many Paparazzi). As our cultures’ uncontrolled longing for celebrity snapshots grows, so do the prices of these photos and the risks the paparazzi will take to get them. The paparazzi work much like private detectives (Valdes). They will travel by train, plane, automobile, helicopter or speedboat to find their target (Schwarzenegger). Each paparazzo chooses a system of informers to keep tabs on celebrity targets. The paparazzi also work with autographers, who stalk celebrities, come up to them in public places and ask them for their autograph. They then make their earnings by selling the autographs to fans and resellers. In many cases, people who work for the star might be bribed to expose where their employer is (Valdes). The paparazzi have had a powerful amount of negative press against them because of incidental reports where they have violated the celebrity’s civil rights to privacy as well as some situations of assault (Many Paparazzi).
Paparazzi sell their photos to the highest bidder. Depending on the scenario, subject and quality of the photos, they can sell for anywhere between a couple hun...
... middle of paper ...
...in in Paparazzi” CNN Entertainment. Turner Broadcasting
System, Inc, 01 October 1988. Web. 27 February 2011.
4. "DIANA'S DEATH." The Interactive Media Lab at the University of Florida. Web. 27 Feb. 2011.
5. Halbfinger, David M., and Allison Hope Weiner. “As Paparazzi Push Harder, Stars
Try to Push Back.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 9 June 2005.
Web. 10 February 2011.
6.“The Many Paparazzi Lawsuits with Celebrities” Paparazzi.com. Paparazzi.com, 2011.
Web. 13 February 2011.
7. “Schwarzenegger signs new anti-paparazzi law” CNN Justice. Turner Broadcasting
System, Inc, 14 October 2009. Web. 13 February 2011.
8. Simmons, Simone., and Susan Hill. Diana: The Secret Years. New York: The Ballatine
Publishing Group, 1998. Print.
9. Valdes, Robert. “How Paparazzi Work” HowStuffWorks. How Stuff Works, Inc, 1998.
Web. 10 February 2011.
The question of paparazzi threatening privacy and First Amendment rights is often to situational to argue in a conventional manner, but certainly there are many facets of the issue which can be addressed in a quite straightforward manner. Celebrities who feel they have the right to privacy in public places often muddy the waters of this issue. Oddly enough, those celebrities who have chosen to speak out against what they feel are violations of their privacy most always begin their campaigns with a large press conference. In other words, they gather together those people they wish to not only suppress but also berate in hopes that these people will use their positions and skills to carry these celebrity's messages to the public. Is often seems that theses celebrities want it "both ways" in that they appreciate coverage when they have a movie, record, or book coming out, but not at any other time.
The New Yorker, 21 Oct. 1996. Print. The.
N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Mar. 2014. "It's Time to Force a Change." "" by Perry, Earnest L., Jr. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Mar.
Klein, Jeff Z. "Hits to Head Pressuring The N.H.L. To Change." News Bank - Access World News. New York Times, 12 Nov. 2009. Web. 5 Mar. 2011.
SACRAMENTO, C.A. – Steven P. Unger spoke on Thursday afternoon about his popular book “Before the Paparazzi: 50 Years of Extraordinary Pictures”, which features a nostalgic outlook on America.
...uld be justifiable to emphasize that a good number of them find it sickening to miss the limelight. . Nonetheless, it goes without mentioning that celebrities get exploited because some gossip stories explore the things that would otherwise be considered to be private.
After observing and researching all the sources portraying celebrities I have came into a conclusion that todays society it seems like all we want is to be accepted and we tend to look at other people and judge. Its not right, we all are different and thats what makes the world go round. It would be a pretty boring world if we were all the same. Celebrities deal with this everyday, I think the paparazzi know more about some celebrities lives than they actually do. They judge them for who they are and what they do, it is not right nor fair.
Celebrities like acting and singing for the public, but it does not mean fame is really their thing. Celebrities sometimes just like acting because it is what they like and want privacy. During an interview with Today, an American talk show, the popular actor Johnny Depp was interviewed and according to Liat Kornowski, Deputy Director of Growth and Analytics, The Huffington Post, he mention that being famous is like being a fugitive when he stated, “...and then you start to realize that for the past 10 or 15 years you've been going into restaurants through the back door, scurrying along greasy floors, trying to get to some private room. It's not unlike living like a fugitive." Johnny Depp likes his career, but might not appreciate that he needs to hide from paparazzi and can not take his children to take a walk to the park or the streets because of cameras following him almost every public place he goes. Many celebrities have the same opinion as Johnny Depp when people do not give celebrities the privacy to enjoy a day out with their children and family for one day with no one bothering them. When people say that celebrities are rude it can be because the celebrities do not want attention drawn to their child. Celebrities can have all the fancy clothes and pay hundreds of dollars on it but should
The public has been revolutionary to have access into celebrities’ private life thanks to the “paparazzi”. Definitely, celebrities will always be in front of the camera. It comes with the frame. Nevertheless, it does not justify photographing and the lives of people at the expanse of their privacy.
Photographing an individual whether famous or not in public will not violate that person’s privacy under the laws in most countries. Assuming the paparazzi isn’t assaulting someone or trespassing or otherwise doing something illegal while taking such a picture, he or she will not be violating the law. Public figures do not ask for a total invasion of their privitness .Few of us lead lives that are not classified into a newsworthy. Just because these people contribute to their profession in front of the world, it does not mean that they should be denied the right to privacy and respect. Therefore Paparazzi should be banned from exposing people’s private lives, any way they want.
The deception of media consumers allows for the abuse of economic infrastructures of society. An obsession with celebrities’ lives passifies ordinary people in accepting the stratification of the elite businesses and the ordinary citizens. Though pseudo-events and celebrity worship may not be exactly complementary, the similarities of both leaves the public to be utterly vulnerable unless they begin to critically think for themselves.
What are the celebrities doing? Today, we live in a society that tends to drown our everyday lives in mass media such as tabloids, reality shows, newspapers such as the New York Times and personal-interest magazines, like People and Us, to get a glimpse of the interesting lives of everyday celebrities. Some might say that a celebrity is someone who we idolize, while Daniel Boorstin, author of the book The Image: Or What Happened to the American Dream, states that a celebrity “is a person who is well-known for his well-knownness” (Epstein1). But the question still remains. what are celebrities?
The New York Times, 22 Aug. 2013. Web.
The term paparazzi is defined as a freelance photographer, usually one who takes candid pictures of celebrities for publication. The term originated from the surname of the 1959 Federico film, La Dolce Vita. Now, the connotation that arises from the word “paparazzi” is much stronger than just a freelance photographer. The paparazzi are annoying, persistent photographers who, in essence, stalk their celebrity victims and go to any length necessary to get the photograph they desire. But, the paparazzi are doing their job to please the public. Paparazzi tend to target celebrities that fascinate the public; the public’s obsession encourages the paparazzi in their pursuit. The public never calls out the paparazzi for invading the celebrities’ privacy; they only call them out when harm or threats come to the celebrity (Nordhaus 286).
They want to know everything about them and have a desire for more information. Celebrities should have their right to privacy due to historical/practical rights, their invasion of privacy with paparazzi, and their childrens’ rights to privacy. They are ordinary people just with a famous role in life. Historical/practical rights are one of the biggest issues and it all started back in colonial America. In colonial America, privacy was constrained.