Liability for Omissions in Tort Law Essay

:: 21 Works Cited
Length: 882 words (2.5 double-spaced pages)
Rating: Yellow      
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

There is a strict distinction between acts and omissions in tort of negligence. “A person is often not bound to take positive action unless they have agreed to do so, and have been paid for doing so.” (Cane.2009; 73) The rule is a settled one and allows some exceptions only in extreme circumstances. The core idea can be summarized in “why pick on me” argument. This attitude was spectacularly demonstrated in a notoriously known psychological experiment “The Bystander effect” (Latané & Darley. 1968; 377-383). Through practical scenarios, psychologists have found that bystanders are more reluctant to intervene in emergency situations as the size of the group increases. Such acts of omission are hardly justifiable in moral sense, but find some legal support. “A man is entitled to be as negligent as he pleases towards the whole world if he owes no duty to them.” (L Esher Lievre v Gould [1893] 1 Q.B. 497) Definitely, when there is no sufficient proximity between the parties, a legal duty to take care cannot be lawfully exonerated and imposed, as illustrated in Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] All ER (D) 722). If it could, individuals would have been in the permanent state of over- responsibility for others, neglecting their own needs. Policy considerations in omission cases are not inspired by the parable of Good Samaritan ideas. Judges do favour individualism as it “permits the avoidance of vulnerability and requires self-sufficiency. “ (Hoffmaster.2006; 36)
Psychiatric harm
The dubious character of nervous shock claims received strong criticism in the past and is still not fully recognised in the present. (Teff. 1998; 92) The main reason underpinning hostile attitude to review the claims is the uncertai...

... middle of paper ...

...laims generated by genetic technology, 1st ed., Routledge, Oxon
Journal Articles
• Atiyah, P. (1967) Negligence and Economic Loss, Law Quarterly Review, 83, 270
• Darley, J. M. & Latané, B. (1968) Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8, 377–383
• Hoffmaster, B. (2006) What Does Vulnerability Mean? , Hastings Center Report 38, 42, 36
• Lamont, W.D. (1941) Justice: Distributive and Corrective, Philosophy,16, 61, 11
• Mullender, R & Speirs, A (2000) Negligence, Psychiatric Injury, and the Altruism Principle, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20,4, 645
• Teff, H. (1998) Liability for Negligently Inflicted Psychiatric Harm: Justifications and Boundaries, The Cambridge Law Journal 57,1, 92
• Weinrib,E.J. (2002) Corrective Justice in a Nutshell, University of Toronto Law Journal,52, 1

Click the button above to view the complete essay, speech, term paper, or research paper

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

This essay is 100% guaranteed.

Title Length Color Rating  
Tort Law: Adam and Callum Essay - In tort law there is negligence and within this there is the duty of care element, which helps to decide if compensation should be emplaced. The concept of negligence is a difficult one and has been broken into three separate parts: · Duty of care owed by the defendant to the claimant · Breach of that duty of care · Damage caused to the claimant as a result of the defendant's breach in duty of care. All three parts have to be present before negligence can be proved. One requirement for proving the tort of negligence is that a duty of care exists between the claimant and the defendant....   [tags: Tort Law] 957 words
(2.7 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
The Tort of Negligence Essay - “The categories of negligence are never closed”. [Lord Macmillan in Donoghue v. Stevenson- (1932)] The tort of negligence is a relatively recent phenomenon, which has come to become the most dynamic and rapidly changing areas of liability in modern law. Lord Macmillan’s assertion that “ the categories of negligence are never closed” suggests how courts possess the power to expand the area of liability by bringing in new duty situations as a result of new set of facts coming is everyday....   [tags: Tort Law] 876 words
(2.5 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Key Similarities and Differences Between Roman Delict and Common Law Tort - Q3. There is an obvious parallel between the Roman delict and the common law tort; but the analogy should not be pursued too far’. What are the key similarities and differences between roman delict and common law tort. Introduction A tort can be defined as a wrong that interferes with a person’s legally protected interests , whereas, a delict can be defined as a wrongful act causing damage to someone’s personality, family or property. There are many similarities between the Roman law of Delicts and the common law of Torts, including the similarity between the tort of liability for animals and the Actio de Pauperie and the Edict of the Aediles, the tort of trespass to land and the tort of...   [tags: Law, Legal Analysis]
:: 11 Works Cited
1969 words
(5.6 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Employer's Liability in Tort's Law Essay - Employer’s Liability. Employer’s liability is a section of Tort Law that deals with the liability, employers’ have for occupational injuries to their employees arising from their negligence. At the start there was a slow start to impose liability in negligence on employers in relation to injuries to their employees. This meant there was little protection for employees within their workspace in respect to health and safety. Employer’s liability didn’t occur until the early part of the nineteenth century....   [tags: common laws jurisdiction]
:: 35 Works Cited
1335 words
(3.8 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Tort Law Cases Essay - Presented are four separate cases that have been argued and settled in a court of law. Each of these cases represent a different kind of tort, a tort is a civil wrong or wrongful act, which can be either intentional or accidental, from which injury occurs to another (Hill & Hill n.d.). The torts are as listed, intentional, criminal, negligence, and liability as presented in the four researched cases. State Rubbish Collectors Ass’n v. Siliznoff When a person violates another person’s legal rights deliberately it is considered an intentional tort (Mayer et al....   [tags: Tort Law Cases]
:: 5 Works Cited
1554 words
(4.4 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Assessment of the Likley Risks of Tort and Criminal Liability Essay - Assessment of the Likley Risks of Tort and Criminal Liability Dear Mr. Bond: The purpose of this letter is to identify and assess the likely risks of tort and criminal liability arising from the operations of Joe’s Landscaping and Tree Trimming (JLTS) business. The assessment will supply guidance as Joe selects his insurance needs. ”Tort liability is a claim against JLTS or its employees for damage to or loss of property or personal injury or death. Such claims may be brought only for damage, injury, or death arising out of the activities of JLTS” (Palk, 2001, p.1)....   [tags: Tort Law] 544 words
(1.6 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Tort Law for Damages Practiced in Civil Law Essay - Tort Law Tort Law has been a Civil Law practiced and used since the beginning of Law, after mankind first discovered what was right and what was wrong. It is a private or civil wrong for which damages may be removed and involves; falls at work, work vehicles, and nuisances. It’s a civil law that can be recognized for a law suit. It has a wide range of provisions and can range from negligence, purposeful, and ethics. Among the types of damages the injured party may recover are: loss of earnings capacity, pain and suffering, and reasonable medical expenses....   [tags: financial, liability, suit] 1220 words
(3.5 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
The Tort of Negligence Essay examples - There are three elements that must be present for an act or omission to be negligent; (1) The defendant owed a duty of care towards the plaintiff; (2) The defendant breached the duty of care by an act or omission; (3) The plaintiff must suffer damage as a result - be it physical, emotional or financial. The court might decide that Freddy (the plaintiff) was owed a duty of care by Elvis (the defendant) if they find that what happened to Freddy was in the realm of reasonable forseeability - any harm that could be caused to a 'neighbour' by Elvis' actions that he could reasonably have expected to happen....   [tags: Tort Law] 1121 words
(3.2 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
The Absence of the Concept of Transferred Malice in Irish Tort Law Essay - The Absence of the Concept of Transferred Malice in Irish Tort Law Introduction The title of this assignment, which i propose that i shall be revisiting for the purposes of this tort project is that: “the concept of transferred malice is not accepted in Irish tort law” In dealing with this topic I will inevitably be looking at what a battery is, what is transferred malice, cases in other jurisdictions which have accepted the concept of transferred malice in tort law, transferred malice in crime and why it is accepted in criminal law, and finally my arguments as to why I believe it should be adopted into our jurisdiction....   [tags: Tort Law] 1887 words
(5.4 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Tort, Negligence and Nuisance Claims Essay - A number of aspects of liability rise from this case study and each one will be discussed. With regards to the headaches suffered by Karl, it is necessary to look at private nuisance. Negligence is disregarded as it is assumed from the details in the case study that the headaches suffered are not so serious as to cause personal injury, it is just described as ‘mere discomfort’. Such a claim under the law of nuisance requires three factors to be fulfilled. The first being a continuous interference....   [tags: Tort Law] 1310 words
(3.7 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]