God is Potrayed as Law in Before the Law by Franz Kafka

1194 Words3 Pages

When first reading Franz Kafka’s Before the Law, one might think the story is both straightforward and complex. The plot is so undeniable that it obviously challenges further description. It includes a man attempting in vain to gain entrance to a coveted door; he uses whatever remains of his life holding up for authorization which is never conceded. Although the action is logical, its setting is not in the least identical with our existence. Nor do we distinguish the characters. The man from the country has been contracted to the embodiment of a relentless craving, the doorkeeper is restricted to the capacity of an impediment, the personality of the Law remains covered up. However, once we acknowledge the sort of actuality characterized by these confinements, the story represents no issue. Yet it is clearly meant to be a parable. This is proposed by its context in The Trail. Some mechanisms used in a parable are effectively distinguished (no names, the central plot, the point made at the end). Although the subtle elements of the plot are crystal clear, the story all in all positively calls for understanding. If it is an anecdote it must “signify” something. What then does it mean?
Franz Kafka’s “Before the Law” is often referred to as a parable. Thus, it is logical to approach Kafka’s work as an allegory and search for the deeper meaning underneath the story. We can then try to uncover the identity of the characters; of the gatekeeper, the man from the country, and the Law and subsequently relating them to something that fits the example of the plot; a man’s confused search for god, a man’s quest for happiness but never accomplishing it, a academic’s quest for recognition which never comes. Any given number of innovative readers...

... middle of paper ...

...ntryman, has come prepared to influence the gatekeeper into giving him a chance to pass. Despite the countryman’s determination the gatekeeper does not provide for him the authorization, abandoning us to feel that one cannot buy access to God. On the other hand, it ought to be expressed that the gatekeeper takes the valuables offered by the countryman, which is somewhat similar to the way religion asks individuals for “indulgences” in order to reach alleged salvation. Put differently, Kafka is contributing his critique upon the idea to which individuals have systematized religion and most significantly changed its immaculate and profound importance. Also, in the event that we may look upon the character of Law as being God, the gatekeeper as being a modernized servant of God, and the countryman as an individual in search of God; the parable seems to make some sense.

Open Document