Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Hamlet movies comparison
Hamlet movies comparison
Hamlet movies comparison
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Hamlet movies comparison
In this essay I will compare and contrast “Romeo and Juliet” by William Shakespeare. Romeo and Juliet is one of William Shakespeare’s most famous works. I will compare and contrast the 1968 film by Franco Zefferilli and 1996 Baz Luhrman’s film. It has been adapted into screenplays, and remade countless times. Baz Luhrman’s and William Shakespeare’s versions of Romeo and Juliet are similar in theme, but are different in setting, mood, and character personalities.
The character of Romeo is a lovesick man who keeps changing his mind about the lady he fancies. To compare both text and film, Romeo doesn’t care about the feud between the Capulet’s and Montague’s until he meets Juliet. When Romeo sets eyes on Juliet he fall in love instantly which means that he doesn’t love Rosaline anymore. In the text of “Romeo and Juliet”, Juliet falls in love with Romeo while wearing a mask and they do not see each other’s faces and fall in love whereas, in the film by Luhrman, Romeo is wearing an armour and Juliet is dressed as a fairy which gives the impression that Romeo is Juliet’s knight and has come to rescue her. Furthermore, Romeos fight with Tybalt. In the text Romeo uses a sword to fight Tybalt in act 2 scene 1 alternatively, in Luhrman’s film; Romeo shoots Tybalt with a gun into a lake.
The character of Juliet is a young 13 year old who is soon to be pulled into a forced marriage. In both text and film, Juliet is told by her parents that she has to marry a man named Paris. You could also compare how Juliet doesn’t like Paris and lies to her parents about whom she really likes. When there is the Capulet’s ball, Paris and Juliet are supposed to get to know each other. In the text, Juliet spots Romeo behind a pillar whereas; in Luhrman f...
... middle of paper ...
...n Luhrman’s film. The second main contrast is the Capulet and Montague meeting. This is because the meeting tells us how they died and who is involved in the incident but in the Luhrman’s movie the meeting is cut out. This means only Romeo, Juliet, Mercutio and Tybalt died.
To conclude, the characters in “Romeo and Juliet” are all different in the text and film. Also the setting is different and there a main and minor points in both text and film. In my opinion, I prefer the Luhrman’s film as it is modern and simple to understand. This is because Luhrman’s film is modern which makes it more interesting because there are guns and cars which shows us the technology in the 21st century whereas in the text there are traditional settings, props etc. This doesn’t appeal to a wide range of audience in the 21st century because no one uses a sword and a horse for transport.
Comparison Between Act 3 Scene 1 in Franco Zeferelli's Romeo and Juliet and in Baz Luhrman's Romeo and Juliet
Comparing Zefferelli's production of Romeo and Juliet with Luhrman Production. In this essay I am going to write about the production of Romeo. In Franco Zeffirelli's production of Romeo and Juliet, the setting and language are of a traditional, realistic nature. This is complete.
Romeo and Juliet is a play about two lovers who have to risk their lives in order to demonstrate their love and will to stay together, regardless the feud between their families. By the end, the death of Romeo and Juliet finally bring the reconciliation to these two families. It is fate that the two most shall-not meet people fall in love and it love that eventually won against hatred. Since then, there have been many different versions of Romeo and Juliet, whether it was for film, stage, musicals. These different recontextualised adaptions change the original play by many ways, some modernise the language, environment, props as well as changing the original characteristics of some characters. Out of all the different adaptions of Romeo and Juliet, two stood out the most. One was the Romeo and Juliet (1996) and directed by Baz Luhrmann and the other one was Romeo and Juliet Broadway (2013) play version,
Comparing Opening Sequences of Romeo and Juliet In my essay I am going to compare the opening scenes of the two versions of Romeo & Juliet. One is by Franco Zeffirelli, which was. made in the late 1970’s. The other one is by Baz Luhrmann and was made in 1996.
One of the most celebrated plays in history, “Romeo and Juliet”, was written by William Shakespeare in the late 16th century. It is a story about two lovers that have to meet in secret because of an ongoing family feud. Tragically, because of their forbidden love Romeo and Juliet take their lives so they can be together. In 1997, a movie was adapted from the play “Romeo and Juliet”, directed by Baz Lurhmann. However, as alike as the movie and the play are, they are also relatively different.
Romeo and Juliet - Movie vs. Book & nbsp; Often times people say that William Shakespeare was and still is a legend. They are correct. It is amazing how Shakespeare's play Romeo and Juliet was written. centuries ago can be better than Franco Zefferelli's movie production of Romeo. and Juliet, which had much better technology to work with only decades ago. Although the movie appeared better, it left out some major parts. The play had better mood and plot details which made it much more dramatic and by far a better presentation of the. & nbsp; One major difference between the play and the movie occurs in mood. An example of this is the marriage scene. In the marriage scene of the play, Romeo and Juliet is very serious. The reader can tell this by the way the two speak. Romeo says that the Holy Words the Friar speaks can make something without an equal (Act II, Scene 6, Line 4).
The Major Differences Between Two Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet The major differences between the two movies Romeo and Juliet who were
Luhrmann’s 1996 Romeo and Juliet is compelling when communicating the main ideas of the play by providing the audience with a modern translation of the play using the motifs in the film which correlate to the play.
Romeo and Juliet presents an ongoing feud between the Montague and Capulet families whose children meet and fall in love. Markedly, the meeting scene depicting love at first sight continues to be praised by today’s critics. Romeo and Juliet then receive the label of star-crossed lovers whose tragic demise is written in the stars. In fact, Shakespeare 's work is well received and its numerous adaptations have made it one of his most enduring and notorious stories. The cinematic world brings to the screens a disastrous approach by Baz Luhrmann to do the play justice. A glance at Baz Luhrmann’s productions allows audiences to assume he delivers movies which are unlike those of any other filmmaker today, or perhaps ever. Therefore, blending a delicate
Baz Luhrman used filming techniques much more efficiently then Carlei and also used characterisation much better to relate to a modern audience. Luhrman Used clear changes in music and camera shots to convey his point of view on the tragedy making it much easier for the audience to pick up on. Although the language used is more supportive in Carlei’s version, I still think that Luhrman has provided a better balance of modern context to fulfil the audience’s needs while providing insight of William Shakespeare’s love Tragedy of Romeo and
Romeo and Juliet, written by William Shakespeare, is a tragic love story about two young lovers who are forced to be estranged as a result of their feuding families. The play is about their struggle to contravene fate and create a future together. As such, it was only a matter of time before Hollywood would try and emulate Shakespeare’s masterpiece. This had been done before in many films. Prominent among them were, Franco Zeffirelli’s 1968 “Romeo and Juliet” and Baz Luhrmann’s 1996 “William Shakespeare’s Romeo & Juliet.” Both films stay true to the themes of Shakespeare’s original play. However, the modernised Luhrmann film not only maintains the essence of Shakespeare’s writings, Luhrmann makes it relevant to a teenage audience. This is done through the renewal of props and costumes, the reconstruction of the prologue and the upgrading of the setting, whilst preserving the original Shakespearean language. Out of the two, it is Luhrmann who targets Romeo & Juliet to a younger audience to a much larger extent than Zeffirelli.
Baz Lurhmann’s creation of the film Romeo and Juliet has shown that today’s audience can still understand and appreciate William Shakespeare. Typically, when a modern audience think of Shakespeare, they immediately think it will be boring, yet Lurhmann successfully rejuvenates Romeo and Juliet. In his film production he uses a number of different cinematic techniques, costumes and a formidably enjoyable soundtrack; yet changes not one word from Shakespeare’s original play, thus making it appeal to a modern audience.
The movie adds a musical twist to the original Romeo and Juliet, which gives the story a lighter look than the original. Instead of bloody fights, the movie puts in dance and singing scenes. The characters are also different because some of them are in relationships, while others even completely change their roles. For example, Bernardo is Maria’s brother in the story, while in the original play Tybalt plays her cousin. The nurse is also not in a relationship with anyone, while Anita is in a relationship with Bernardo and that fact drastically changes the storyline.
known works, The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. But is it so simple? How do these two compare,
Zeffirelli’s ultimate goal for his version of Romeo and Juliet was to capture Shakespeare’s original intentions for the play while targeting the teenage audience of his generation. Luhrmann’s intentions were different however; he changed the way an audience looks at Shakespeare’s masterpiece by modernising the props, costumes, and sets. Obviously, to match film time quotas Zefirelli and Luhrmann has both cut many lines out of the play.