FDA's Approval of Prescription Drugs

1537 Words4 Pages

There are many direct to consumer advertising for prescription drugs. On television, magazines, radio etc, you see the most recent advertisements for prescription drugs. After some people see the advertisements they soon rush over to their doctor and their illness and life would be perfectly pain and stress free. Making the public conscious of options for treatment is not a bad thing. But these false advertisements are misleading consumers onto unnecessary treatment.

Advertisements have one primary purpose that is to persuade. Prescription medications Ads tell the consumers to get treatment and also imply that they have the need for it to solve their problems. Since prescription Ads have been introduced, the pharmaceutical industry has drastically increased. Manufactures of the pharmaceutical drugs are making more money now than ever.

The use of a supply and demand industry is used by the pharmaceutical industry. To have the sales of a product, the drug company or even the advertiser should create a demand in the market. No demand, or if no one needs the product, no sales will occur.

In the headlines recently, many different types of drug producing companies have been brought up for unethical findings in within the company and affecting the public. The two main companies are the FDA (Federal drug administration) and the drug producing company Merck. The FDA tests all drugs and gives the approval for them to be used by the general public. Merck and co is a drug producing company based in Whitehouse, N.J. Merck creates the drugs and has them tested by the FDA for the approval. Merck is also

the world's fifth largest pharmaceutical firm. Merck is best known for producing drugs such as Singular for As...

... middle of paper ...

... of Mr. Clark consists of cost cutting and layoffs, and restructuring the sales and marketing unit. Mr. Clarks most severe of the changes will consist of reining in research costs and cutting unproductive programs. He also plans to make the company more competitive and efficient, which begins through the supply chain and manufacturing. (Times)

Throughout my research I think that Merck is not to blame, for misleading the public about the effects of the pain-reliever Vioxx. It's apparent that Merck is going to be the only pharmaceutical company to that has to pay the price for a mistake made within the FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration). The FDA is the one who Approved Vioxx and put it into the market for the general public to use. Merck is still not to be blamed, no matter what comes out of the rest of the lawsuits; the company will still pay the price.

Open Document