Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
euthanasia debate arguments
religion and euthanasia debate
legalize euthanasia and assisted suicide
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: euthanasia debate arguments
Euthanasia is the act of mercifully putting one out of their misery. It sounds like something that would be widely accepted in many cases. The problem with this is that it poses as a morality issue for people. This is why legalizing it everywhere is a problem. However one’s view may be on the subject, I for one completely support the practice of assisted suicide. I see nothing wrong with having an option of putting someone out of their misery when they are in so much pain. Regardless, this is such a controversial topic people can’t seem to agree on. For others to choose their standing point on this topic, history must be analyzed to better understand why euthanasia is controversial. According to the history books, euthanasia is a procedure that has been with us since the times before the Common Era. It has been done before so why is it such a problem now? During the time of the Ancient Greek, there weren’t much of an inherently value on human life and the influence of Christianity hadn’t existed either. Performing abortions, committing suicide and active euthanasia was among common practices during that time. Many civilians hoped for a merciful death rather than prolonged pain. Similar to how things are today, there are cases where a family member may ask to be put off life support if the agonizing pain continues. The real issue of the matter is whether or not the doctor should take them off the life support. After the fall of Rome, it seems that the influence of the Church began to draw the lines of morality; what’s right and what’s wrong. With the belief that human life was sacred in the eyes of God, euthanasia became a forbidden practice in those times. That belief carried on for generations to come. Through time it is outlaw...
... middle of paper ...
...fe. My point is that they should at least have the option; keeping someone on life support for so many years with wishful thinking is absurd. Physician assisted suicide is legal in four states in the United States but euthanasia is illegal in all fifty states. It’s only legal in three countries—a large change needs to happen. Euthanasia is morally the correct thing to do when everyone willingly consents to it. That is why it should be legal.
Works Cited
"Belgian Senate Panel to Vote." Theguardian.com. Guardian News and Media, 26 Nov. 2013. Web. 04 Dec. 2013.
Dowbiggin, Ian, and Michael Manning. "Historical Timeline - Euthanasia." ProConorg Headlines. ProCon.org, 23 July 2013. Web. 04 Dec. 2013.
However those who oppose euthanasia believe that if a person has a terminal illness that person should not be assisted in death and should have as much aid in staying alive as possible. They believe that as long as the brain is ...
Keown, John. "The Value of Human Life." Euthanasia, Ethics, and Public Policy: An Argument against Legalisation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP, 2002. 39. Print.
didn't want to wake me. Then he would begin to howl, like a dog. When
McCullough, Colleen. "Why I Oppose Euthanasia." The Weekend Australian 16-17 Mar. 1996. http://www.ucaqld.com.au/trendz/3ethics/oppose.htm (27 Feb. 1997)
Dying with dignity, mercy death, right to die, and assisted suicide are just a few of the common terms, which describe a person’s death by euthanasia. Euthanasia has and always will be a very sensitive and controversial topic. There are two common questions surrounding this dilemma. The first is when is it considered mercy? Is it when a person is facing a terminal illness? The second is when is considered murder? Is it when a person looking for an easy way out of suffering and pain? This paper will examine the ethical dilemma of euthanasia according to the Christian worldview and compare it to other options of resolving the dilemma.
Euthanasia and assisted suicide is known as a process in which an individual (sick or disabled) engages in an act that leads to his or her own death with the help of physicians or family members to end pain and suffering. There are several other terms used for this process, such as active euthanasia or passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia refers to what is being done to actively end life while passive euthanasia is referred as eliminating a treatment that will prolong a patient’s life, which will eventually lead to death (Levy et al., 2103, p. 402). Euthanasia and assisted suicide pose a significant ethical issue today, and understanding the issue requires examining the different principles, such as the ethical issue, professional code of conduct, strength and limitations, autonomy and informed consent, beneficence and nonmaleficence, distribution, and confidentiality and truthfulness.
...o end their lives. If they are continually suffering every day and spend most of their time in a hospital, they should have the right to undergo euthanasia. However, after doing research on this topic and gaining insightful information, especially from the Catholic Church, I am now against euthanasia. I learned that a human life should never be ended by morally unacceptable means. Life, given to us by God, is sacred and we should do everything in our power to protect our lives and the lives of others. Even if refusing euthanasia only gives an individual a few more hours to live, that person should nonetheless refuse. “Human life, as a gift of God, is sacred and inviolable. For this reason procured abortion and euthanasia are absolutely unacceptable. Not only must human life not be taken, but it must be protected with loving concern.” (John Paul II – Evangelium Vitae)
ProCon. "Historical Timeline." Euthanasia - ProCon.org. ProCon.org, 28 Sept. 2010. Web. 15 Nov. 2011. .
The ethical debate regarding euthanasia dates back to ancient Greece and Rome. It was the Hippocratic School (c. 400B.C.) that eliminated the practice of euthanasia and assisted suicide from medical practice. Euthanasia in itself raises many ethical dilemmas – such as, is it ethical for a doctor to assist a terminally ill patient in ending his life? Under what circumstances, if any, is euthanasia considered ethically appropriate for a doctor? More so, euthanasia raises the argument of the different ideas that people have about the value of the human experience.
Euthanasia has been a controversial topic in the United States for many years now. Euthanasia is the practice of intentionally ending ones life, to relive them from any more pain or suffering. Euthanasia can also be known as mercy killing or mercy death. There are many different viewpoints on whether euthanasia is right or wrong. Those who are for euthanasia believes it is a way to relive extreme pain and suffering and it is a right of freedom of choice to do what one wants to their body. Those who are against euthanasia believe euthanasia devalues human life, goes against religion, and it can cause a slippery slope effect. Euthanasia is a topic that is viewed in different ways in the eyes of different people it is either viewed as a persons
As patients come closer to the end of their lives, certain organs stop performing as well as they use to. People are unable to do simple tasks like putting on clothes, going to the restroom without assistance, eat on our own, and sometimes even breathe without the help of a machine. Needing to depend on someone for everything suddenly brings feelings of helplessness much like an infant feels. It is easy to see why some patients with terminal illnesses would seek any type of relief from this hardship, even if that relief is suicide. Euthanasia or assisted suicide is where a physician would give a patient an aid in dying. “Assisted suicide is a controversial medical and ethical issue based on the question of whether, in certain situations, Medical practioners should be allowed to help patients actively determine the time and circumstances of their death” (Lee). “Arguments for and against assisted suicide (sometimes called the “right to die” debate) are complicated by the fact that they come from very many different points of view: medical issues, ethical issues, legal issues, religious issues, and social issues all play a part in shaping people’s opinions on the subject” (Lee). Euthanasia should not be legalized because it is considered murder, it goes against physicians’ Hippocratic Oath, violates the Controlled
Is it right to intentionally bring about the death of a person? The vast majority of people would instinctively answer this question “no,” unless it related to an act of war or perhaps self-defense. What if taking the life of the person would benefit that person by ending their suffering? Would it be morally acceptable to end their suffering? Questions like these are debated by those considering the morality of euthanasia, which is a very controversial topics in America. Euthanasia can be defined as “bringing about the death of another person to somehow benefit that person” (Pojman). The term implies that the death is intentional. Because there are several different types of euthanasia, it is difficult to make a blanket statement concerning the morality of euthanasia. This paper will discuss the particular morality of the passive and active forms of involuntary, nonvoluntary, and voluntary euthanasia. I believe that voluntary passive euthanasia is morally acceptable, while all other forms of euthanasia are ultimately immoral.
Euthanasia had become a big debate in our society and the world. Many people ask, what is Euthanasia? “Euthanasia is a deliberate intervention or omission with the express intention of hastening or ending and individual’s life, to relieve intractable pain or suffering” (Sanders & Chaloner, 2007, p. 41). Thus the meaning of euthanasia is having the right to die if you are terminally ill, suffering and/or suffering a great amount of pain. Many people do not agree with the use of euthanasia, but if humans can put down animals why cannot we use euthanasia on humans? Back in ancient Greek and Roman times, the word euthanasia meant “good death”. Also it was allowed because many people did not live to long ages. When the times began to change so did people’s views on euthanasia, due to the new religion of Judeo-Christian Belief. Because life and death were giving to us by God, euthanasia goes against his wishes. If they practice in the act of euthanasia because of their beliefs they would be committing a sin and end up going to hell. (Yip,2009,p.1)
Robert Matz; Daniel P. Sudmasy; Edward D. Pallegrino. "Euthanasia: Morals and Ethics." Archives of Internal Medicine 1999: p1815 Aug. 9, 1999 .
In the following essay, I argue that euthanasia is not morally acceptable because it always involves killing, and undermines intrinsic value of human being. The moral basis on which euthanasia defends its position is contradictory and arbitrary in that its moral values represented in such terms as ‘mercy killing’, ‘dying with dignity’, ‘good death’ and ‘right for self-determination’ fail to justify taking one’s life.