Ethics Essay

1035 Words3 Pages

Many people face ethical dilemmas everyday where they might have to choose between their personal beliefs, or to strictly obey laws and rules. However not all can make the correct decisions because such dilemmas are difficult to answer and one may differ from another in moral stance. Applying my own moral principles to solve the dilemma, I believe that a postconventional approach must be taken if I were the CFO. Although I have a legal responsibility as Chief Financial Officer to keep valuable investment information confidential until the company releases such information to the public, the financial situation of the company demands that a law must be disregarded in order to save this firm that provides many people a source of income and overall security. Moreover I feel that as a human being, I also have a responsibility to protect the welfare of my co-workers who are in jeopardy of losing employment that I am fully capable of preventing. In this postconventional approach, “no harm is done and thousands of jobs are saved,” a much greater result than the tragedy that would surely result when I follow the law in this situation. I believe that the morally correct decision to take in this case is to inform Mr. Smith of the crucial contract and ensure the immediate future of the firm and its employees because the benefits of these actions greatly outweigh the potential consequences. I am also fully aware that this course of action is extremely perilous and can result to the demise of my career, probable jail time, and may also possible end the firm itself; however, I would much rather challenge those risks because it would guarantee the welfare of the company and its dependents for a while longer than if I were to remain passive and... ... middle of paper ... ...g approaches, various emotions that result from patriotism can act as positive reinforcements to their actions, even though a terrible consequence, massive unemployment in this case, may result. On the other hand, one could take the selfless, postconventional approach to this dilemma where he would need to commit the crime of insider trading to do what he believes is righteous. This course of action is “selfless” because a person would act not to merely be rewarded or to avoid punishment as is the case with preconventional thinking, but that person would act so that what he or she believes is morally correct is done, even with the possibilities of punishments that accompany such deeds. By contrasting the different approaches presented in Lawrence Kohlberg’s moral stage theory, one can better see the results that would be generated from their respective beliefs.

More about Ethics Essay

Open Document